Waleed El-Khayat1, Mostafa Elsadek2, Waleed Saber3. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt; Middle East Fertility Center, Doki, Giza, Egypt. Electronic address: waleed_elkhyat@yahoo.com. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt; Middle East Fertility Center, Doki, Giza, Egypt. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of endometrial injury in the cycle preceding ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycle on the clinical pregnancy rate. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective randomized controlled trial which included three hundred and thirty two infertile women with an indication for IUI. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups. The intervention group (group A) (n=166) subjects underwent office hysteroscopy with endometrial injury using grasping forceps with teeth, while the control group (group B) (n=166) subjects underwent office hysteroscopy alone without endometrial injury. Primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline or clinical characteristics between the groups. There were no significant differences in clinical pregnancy rate [13.8% (23/166) versus 12% (20/166); RR 1.15 (95% CI 0.66-2.01), p=0.62]. The abortion rate [4.3% (1/23) versus 15% (3/20); RR 0.29 (95% CI 0.03-2.57), p=0.27], the multiple pregnancy rate [13% (3/23) versus 15% (3/20); RR 0.87 (95% CI 0.20-3.83), p=0.85] and the live birth rate [13.6% (22/166) versus 10.4% (17/166); RR 1.28 (95% CI 0.71-2.32), p=0.42]. CONCLUSION: There is no evidence of significant difference on the clinical pregnancy rate when endometrial scratching during hysteroscopy is compared to only hysteroscopy in women undergoing IUI.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of endometrial injury in the cycle preceding ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycle on the clinical pregnancy rate. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective randomized controlled trial which included three hundred and thirty two infertile women with an indication for IUI. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups. The intervention group (group A) (n=166) subjects underwent office hysteroscopy with endometrial injury using grasping forceps with teeth, while the control group (group B) (n=166) subjects underwent office hysteroscopy alone without endometrial injury. Primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline or clinical characteristics between the groups. There were no significant differences in clinical pregnancy rate [13.8% (23/166) versus 12% (20/166); RR 1.15 (95% CI 0.66-2.01), p=0.62]. The abortion rate [4.3% (1/23) versus 15% (3/20); RR 0.29 (95% CI 0.03-2.57), p=0.27], the multiple pregnancy rate [13% (3/23) versus 15% (3/20); RR 0.87 (95% CI 0.20-3.83), p=0.85] and the live birth rate [13.6% (22/166) versus 10.4% (17/166); RR 1.28 (95% CI 0.71-2.32), p=0.42]. CONCLUSION: There is no evidence of significant difference on the clinical pregnancy rate when endometrial scratching during hysteroscopy is compared to only hysteroscopy in women undergoing IUI.
Authors: Mohan S Kamath; Jan Bosteels; Thomas M D'Hooghe; Srividya Seshadri; Steven Weyers; Ben Willem J Mol; Frank J Broekmans; Sesh Kamal Sunkara Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-04-16
Authors: Jan Bosteels; Steffi van Wessel; Steven Weyers; Frank J Broekmans; Thomas M D'Hooghe; M Y Bongers; Ben Willem J Mol Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-12-05
Authors: Bich Ngoc Bui; Sarah F Lensen; Ahmed Gibreel; Wellington P Martins; Helen Torrance; Frank J Broekmans Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-03-18