Literature DB >> 26342315

Theoretical limitations of quantification for noncompetitive sandwich immunoassays.

Christine F Woolley1, Mark A Hayes2, Prasun Mahanti3, S Douglass Gilman4, Tom Taylor5.   

Abstract

Immunoassays exploit the highly selective interaction between antibodies and antigens to provide a vital method for biomolecule detection at low concentrations. Developers and practitioners of immunoassays have long known that non-specific binding often restricts immunoassay limits of quantification (LOQs). Aside from non-specific binding, most efforts by analytical chemists to reduce the LOQ for these techniques have focused on improving the signal amplification methods and minimizing the limitations of the detection system. However, with detection technology now capable of sensing single-fluorescence molecules, this approach is unlikely to lead to dramatic improvements in the future. Here, fundamental interactions based on the law of mass action are analytically connected to signal generation, replacing the four- and five-parameter fittings commercially used to approximate sigmoidal immunoassay curves and allowing quantitative consideration of non-specific binding and statistical limitations in order to understand the ultimate detection capabilities of immunoassays. The restrictions imposed on limits of quantification by instrumental noise, non-specific binding, and counting statistics are discussed based on equilibrium relations for a sandwich immunoassay. Understanding the maximal capabilities of immunoassays for each of these regimes can greatly assist in the development and evaluation of immunoassay platforms. While many studies suggest that single molecule detection is possible through immunoassay techniques, here, it is demonstrated that the fundamental limit of quantification (precision of 10 % or better) for an immunoassay is approximately 131 molecules and this limit is based on fundamental and unavoidable statistical limitations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Detection limit; Immunoassay; Molecular shot noise; Single molecule

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26342315      PMCID: PMC4636921          DOI: 10.1007/s00216-015-9018-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem        ISSN: 1618-2642            Impact factor:   4.142


  32 in total

1.  Immunoassay of plasma insulin in man.

Authors:  R S YALOW; S A BERSON
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  1961 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 9.461

2.  Assay of plasma insulin in human subjects by immunological methods.

Authors:  R S YALOW; S A BERSON
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1959-11-21       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Kinetics of protein binding in solid-phase immunoassays: theory.

Authors:  Konstantin V Klenin; Wlad Kusnezow; Jörg Langowski
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 4.  Artifacts and limitations of enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  A J Pesce; J G Michael
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1992-06-24       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Least detectable concentration and dynamic range of three immunoassay systems using the same antibody.

Authors:  Thomas R Glass; Naoya Ohmura; Hiroshi Saiki
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-01-27       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Defining the smallest analyte concentration an immunoassay can measure.

Authors:  E N Brown; T J McDermott; K J Bloch; A D McCollom
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 7.  Kinetics of antigen-antibody reactions at solid-liquid interfaces.

Authors:  M Stenberg; H Nygren
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1988-10-04       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  Effect of antibody affinity on the isotherm of antibody binding to surface-immobilized antigen.

Authors:  M Werthén; H Nygren
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1988-11-25       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Determination of one thousandth of an attomole (1 zeptomole) of alkaline phosphatase: application in an immunoassay of proinsulin.

Authors:  D B Cook; C H Self
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 8.327

10.  Detection of one milliattomole of ferritin by novel and ultrasensitive enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  S Hashida; E Ishikawa
Journal:  J Biochem       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.387

View more
  4 in total

1.  Focal molography is a new method for the in situ analysis of molecular interactions in biological samples.

Authors:  Volker Gatterdam; Andreas Frutiger; Klaus-Peter Stengele; Dieter Heindl; Thomas Lübbers; Janos Vörös; Christof Fattinger
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 39.213

2.  Design and Analysis of a Sample-and-Hold CMOS Electrochemical Sensor for Aptamer-based Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

Authors:  Jun-Chau Chien; Sam W Baker; H Tom Soh; Amin Arbabian
Journal:  IEEE J Solid-State Circuits       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 5.013

3.  Improved immunoassay sensitivity and specificity using single-molecule colocalization.

Authors:  Amani A Hariri; Sharon S Newman; Steven Tan; Dan Mamerow; Alexandra M Adams; Nicolò Maganzini; Brian L Zhong; Michael Eisenstein; Alexander R Dunn; H Tom Soh
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 4.  Advances in Optical Single-Molecule Detection: En Route to Supersensitive Bioaffinity Assays.

Authors:  Zdeněk Farka; Matthias J Mickert; Matěj Pastucha; Zuzana Mikušová; Petr Skládal; Hans H Gorris
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 15.336

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.