Sarah A Arias1, Ashley F Sullivan2, Ivan Miller3, Carlos A Camargo2, Edwin D Boudreaux4. 1. Butler Hospital and the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University. Electronic address: sarias@butler.org. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Butler Hospital and the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University. 4. Departments of Emergency Medicine, Psychiatry and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although research suggests that crisis hotlines are an effective means of mitigating suicide risk, lack of empirical evidence may limit the use of this method as a research safety protocol. PURPOSE: This study describes the use of a crisis hotline to provide clinical backup for research assessments. METHODS: Data were analyzed from participants in the Emergency Department Safety and Follow-up Evaluation (ED-SAFE) study (n=874). Socio-demographics, call completion data, and data available on suicide attempts occurring in relation to the crisis counseling call were analyzed. Pearson chi-squared statistic for differences in proportions were conducted to compare characteristics of patients receiving versus not receiving crisis counseling. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Overall, there were 163 counseling calls (6% of total assessment calls) from 135 (16%) of the enrolled subjects who were transferred to the crisis line because of suicide risk identified during the research assessment. For those transferred to the crisis line, the median age was 40 years (interquartile range 27-48) with 67% female, 80% white, and 11% Hispanic. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing demand for suicide interventions in diverse healthcare settings warrants consideration of crisis hotlines as a safety protocol mechanism. Our findings provide background on how a crisis hotline was implemented as a safety measure, as well as the type of patients who may utilize this safety protocol.
BACKGROUND: Although research suggests that crisis hotlines are an effective means of mitigating suicide risk, lack of empirical evidence may limit the use of this method as a research safety protocol. PURPOSE: This study describes the use of a crisis hotline to provide clinical backup for research assessments. METHODS: Data were analyzed from participants in the Emergency Department Safety and Follow-up Evaluation (ED-SAFE) study (n=874). Socio-demographics, call completion data, and data available on suicide attempts occurring in relation to the crisis counseling call were analyzed. Pearson chi-squared statistic for differences in proportions were conducted to compare characteristics of patients receiving versus not receiving crisis counseling. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Overall, there were 163 counseling calls (6% of total assessment calls) from 135 (16%) of the enrolled subjects who were transferred to the crisis line because of suicide risk identified during the research assessment. For those transferred to the crisis line, the median age was 40 years (interquartile range 27-48) with 67% female, 80% white, and 11% Hispanic. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing demand for suicide interventions in diverse healthcare settings warrants consideration of crisis hotlines as a safety protocol mechanism. Our findings provide background on how a crisis hotline was implemented as a safety measure, as well as the type of patients who may utilize this safety protocol.
Authors: Tracy K Witte; Madelyn S Gould; Jimmie Lou Harris Munfakh; Marjorie Kleinman; Thomas E Joiner; John Kalafat Journal: J Clin Psychol Date: 2010-09
Authors: Kelly Posner; Gregory K Brown; Barbara Stanley; David A Brent; Kseniya V Yershova; Maria A Oquendo; Glenn W Currier; Glenn A Melvin; Laurence Greenhill; Sa Shen; J John Mann Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Sarah A Arias; Zi Zhang; Carla Hillerns; Ashley F Sullivan; Edwin D Boudreaux; Ivan Miller; Carlos A Camargo Journal: Suicide Life Threat Behav Date: 2014-03-03
Authors: Edwin D Boudreaux; Ivan Miller; Amy B Goldstein; Ashley F Sullivan; Michael H Allen; Anne P Manton; Sarah A Arias; Carlos A Camargo Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2013-05-22 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Thomson J Ling; Kristy N Percario; Jessica M Hauck; Emily P Holland; Daniel Isenberg; Tiffany Henawi; Melanie A Peters; Jenna Karahalios; Rebecca Messano Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2018-08-12
Authors: Ivan W Miller; Carlos A Camargo; Sarah A Arias; Ashley F Sullivan; Michael H Allen; Amy B Goldstein; Anne P Manton; Janice A Espinola; Richard Jones; Kohei Hasegawa; Edwin D Boudreaux Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Danielle R Busby; Cheryl A King; David Brent; Jaqueline Grupp-Phelan; Madelyn Gould; Kent Page; Theron Charles Casper Journal: Suicide Life Threat Behav Date: 2019-05-31
Authors: Jennifer E Johnson; Richard Jones; Ted Miller; Ivan Miller; Barbara Stanley; Greg Brown; Sarah A Arias; Louis Cerbo; Julie Rexroth; Holly Fitting; Danis Russell; Sheryl Kubiak; Michael Stein; Christopher Matkovic; Shirley Yen; Brandon Gaudiano; Lauren M Weinstock Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 2.261
Authors: Anthony R Pisani; Madelyn S Gould; Carlos Gallo; Ashkan Ertefaie; Caroline Kelberman; Donald Harrington; Daniel Weller; Shannon Green Journal: Suicide Life Threat Behav Date: 2022-05-26