Literature DB >> 24588679

Using structured telephone follow-up assessments to improve suicide-related adverse event detection.

Sarah A Arias1, Zi Zhang, Carla Hillerns, Ashley F Sullivan, Edwin D Boudreaux, Ivan Miller, Carlos A Camargo.   

Abstract

Adverse event (AE) detection and reporting practices were compared during the first phase of the Emergency Department Safety Assessment and Follow-up Evaluation (ED-SAFE), a suicide intervention study. Data were collected using a combination of chart reviews and structured telephone follow-up assessments postenrollment. Beyond chart reviews, structured telephone follow-up assessments identified 45% of the total AEs in our study. Notably, detection of suicide attempts significantly varied by approach with 53 (18%) detected by chart review, 173 (59%) by structured telephone follow-up assessments, and 69 (23%) marked as duplicates. Findings provide support for utilizing multiple methods for more robust AE detection in suicide research.
© 2014 The American Association of Suicidology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24588679      PMCID: PMC4153801          DOI: 10.1111/sltb.12088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Suicide Life Threat Behav        ISSN: 0363-0234


  16 in total

1.  Suboptimal reporting of adverse medical events to the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System by nurse practitioners and physician assistants.

Authors:  Eli D Ehrenpreis; Humberto Sifuentes; Jamie E Ehrenpreis; Zachary L Smith; Mike L Marshall
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 4.250

2.  Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA): classification of suicidal events in the FDA's pediatric suicidal risk analysis of antidepressants.

Authors:  Kelly Posner; Maria A Oquendo; Madelyn Gould; Barbara Stanley; Mark Davies
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults.

Authors:  Kelly Posner; Gregory K Brown; Barbara Stanley; David A Brent; Kseniya V Yershova; Maria A Oquendo; Glenn W Currier; Glenn A Melvin; Laurence Greenhill; Sa Shen; J John Mann
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  Variability in the definition and reporting of adverse events in suicide prevention trials: an examination of the issues and a proposed solution.

Authors:  Maria A Oquendo; Sarah Feldman; Emily Silverman; Dianne Currier; Gregory K Brown; Donna Chen; Page Chiapella; Ruth Fischbach; Madelyn Gould; Barbara Stanley; David Strauss; Jamie Zelazny; Jane Pearson
Journal:  Arch Suicide Res       Date:  2011

5.  Hospital staff should use more than one method to detect adverse events and potential adverse events: incident reporting, pharmacist surveillance and local real-time record review may all have a place.

Authors:  Sisse Olsen; Graham Neale; Kat Schwab; Beth Psaila; Tejal Patel; E Jane Chapman; Charles Vincent
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-02

6.  'Global trigger tool' shows that adverse events in hospitals may be ten times greater than previously measured.

Authors:  David C Classen; Roger Resar; Frances Griffin; Frank Federico; Terri Frankel; Nancy Kimmel; John C Whittington; Allan Frankel; Andrew Seger; Brent C James
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  A comparison of hospital adverse events identified by three widely used detection methods.

Authors:  James M Naessens; Claudia R Campbell; Jeanne M Huddleston; Bjorn P Berg; John J Lefante; Arthur R Williams; Richard A Culbertson
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.038

8.  Rare adverse medical events in VA inpatient care: reliability limits to using patient safety indicators as performance measures.

Authors:  Alan N West; William B Weeks; James P Bagian
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Tenofovir-associated Fanconi syndrome: review of the FDA adverse event reporting system.

Authors:  Samir K Gupta
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.078

10.  Improving patient safety via automated laboratory-based adverse event grading.

Authors:  Joyce C Niland; Tracey Stiller; Jennifer Neat; Adina Londrc; Dina Johnson; Susan Pannoni
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  4 in total

1.  Improving Suicide Risk Screening and Detection in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Edwin D Boudreaux; Carlos A Camargo; Sarah A Arias; Ashley F Sullivan; Michael H Allen; Amy B Goldstein; Anne P Manton; Janice A Espinola; Ivan W Miller
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Implementation and use of a crisis hotline during the treatment as usual and universal screening phases of a suicide intervention study.

Authors:  Sarah A Arias; Ashley F Sullivan; Ivan Miller; Carlos A Camargo; Edwin D Boudreaux
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Monitoring, assessing, and responding to suicide risk in clinical research.

Authors:  Heather T Schatten; Brandon A Gaudiano; Jennifer M Primack; Sarah A Arias; Michael F Armey; Ivan W Miller; Gary Epstein-Lubow; Lauren M Weinstock
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2020-01

4.  Study Protocol: A randomized controlled trial of suicide risk reduction in the year following jail release (the SPIRIT Trial).

Authors:  Jennifer E Johnson; Richard Jones; Ted Miller; Ivan Miller; Barbara Stanley; Greg Brown; Sarah A Arias; Louis Cerbo; Julie Rexroth; Holly Fitting; Danis Russell; Sheryl Kubiak; Michael Stein; Christopher Matkovic; Shirley Yen; Brandon Gaudiano; Lauren M Weinstock
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.261

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.