Literature DB >> 26341188

Mechanisms and Patterns of Intravascular Ultrasound In-Stent Restenosis Among Bare Metal Stents and First- and Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents.

Kosaku Goto1, Zhijing Zhao1, Mitsuaki Matsumura2, Tomotaka Dohi1, Nobuaki Kobayashi2, Ajay J Kirtane1, LeRoy E Rabbani3, Michael B Collins3, Manish A Parikh1, Susheel K Kodali1, Martin B Leon1, Jeffrey W Moses3, Gary S Mintz2, Akiko Maehara4.   

Abstract

The most common causes of in-stent restenosis (ISR) are intimal hyperplasia and stent under expansion. The purpose of this study was to use intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to compare the ISR mechanisms of bare metal stents (BMS), first-generation drug-eluting stents (DES), and second-generation DES. There were 298 ISR lesions including 52 BMS, 73 sirolimus-eluting stents, 52 paclitaxel-eluting stents, 16 zotarolimus-eluting stents, and 105 everolimus-eluting stent. Mean patient age was 66.6 ± 1.1 years, 74.2% were men, and 48.3% had diabetes mellitus. BMS restenosis presented later (70.0 ± 66.7 months) with more intimal hyperplasia compared with DES (BMS 58.6 ± 15.5%, first-generation DES 52.6 ± 20.9%, second-generation DES 48.2 ± 22.2%, p = 0.02). Although reference lumen areas were similar in BMS and first- and second-generation DES, restenotic DES were longer (BMS 21.8 ± 13.5 mm, first-generation DES 29.4 ± 16.1 mm, second-generation DES 32.1 ± 18.7 mm, p = 0.003), and stent areas were smaller (BMS 7.2 ± 2.4 mm(2), first-generation DES 6.1 ± 2.1 mm(2), second-generation DES 5.7 ± 2.0 mm(2), p <0.001). Stent fracture was seen only in DES (first-generation DES 7 [5.0%], second-generation DES 8 [7.4%], p = 0.13). In conclusion, restenotic first- and second-generation DES were characterized by less neointimal hyperplasia, smaller stent areas, longer stent lengths, and more stent fractures than restenotic BMS.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26341188     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.07.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  13 in total

1.  Five factors and three characteristics of coronary in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Nobuaki Suzuki
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Mechanism of in-stent restenosis after second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES): is it different from bare-metal stents and first-generation DES?

Authors:  Shoichi Kuramitsu; Shinichi Shirai; Kenji Ando
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Use of intravascular ultrasound vs. optical coherence tomography for mechanism and patterns of in-stent restenosis among bare metal stents and drug eluting stents.

Authors:  Muzina Akhtar; Wei Liu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Neoatherosclerosis assessed with optical coherence tomography in restenotic bare metal and first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents.

Authors:  Lei Song; Gary S Mintz; Dong Yin; Myong Hwa Yamamoto; Chee Yang Chin; Mitsuaki Matsumura; Khady Fall; Ajay J Kirtane; Manish A Parikh; Jeffrey W Moses; Ziad A Ali; Richard A Shlofmitz; Akiko Maehara
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  In-Stent Restenosis: Pathophysiology and Treatment.

Authors:  Patrick M Looser; Luke K Kim; Dmitriy N Feldman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-02

6.  Aggressive plaque modification with rotational atherectomy and cutting balloon for optimal stent expansion in calcified lesions.

Authors:  Zhe Tang; Jing Bai; Shao-Ping Su; Pui-Wai Lee; Liang Peng; Tao Zhang; Ting Sun; Jing-Guo Nong; Tian-De Li; Yu Wang
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 7.  Polymer-free versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  James J Wu; Joshua A H Way; Leonard Kritharides; David Brieger
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-12-11

8.  Durable endothelium-mimicking coating for surface bioengineering cardiovascular stents.

Authors:  Qing Ma; Xiuying Shi; Xing Tan; Rui Wang; Kaiqin Xiong; Manfred F Maitz; Yuanyuan Cui; Zhangmei Hu; Qiufen Tu; Nan Huang; Li Shen; Zhilu Yang
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-05-24

9.  Effects of Low Endothelial Shear Stress After Stent Implantation on Subsequent Neointimal Hyperplasia and Clinical Outcomes in Humans.

Authors:  Koki Shishido; Antonios P Antoniadis; Saeko Takahashi; Masaya Tsuda; Shingo Mizuno; Ioannis Andreou; Michail I Papafaklis; Ahmet U Coskun; Caroline O'Brien; Charles L Feldman; Shigeru Saito; Elazer R Edelman; Peter H Stone
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 10.  Personalized Assessment of the Coronary Atherosclerotic Arteries by Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging: Hunting the Vulnerable Plaque.

Authors:  Theodore G Papaioannou; Charalampos Kalantzis; Efstratios Katsianos; Despina Sanoudou; Manolis Vavuranakis; Dimitrios Tousoulis
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2019-01-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.