| Literature DB >> 26339595 |
Menglong Xiang1, Lei Sun2, Xiaomei Dong2, Huan Yang2, Wen-bin Liu2, Niya Zhou2, Xue Han2, Ziyuan Zhou1, Zhihong Cui2, Jing-yi Liu2, Jia Cao2, Lin Ao2.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to examine the association between polymorphisms of DNA repair genes and chromosomal damage of 1,3-butadiene- (BD-) exposed workers. The study was conducted in 45 pairs of occupationally exposed workers in a BD product workshop and matched control workers in an administrative office and a circulatory water workshop in China. Newly developed biomarkers (micronuclei, MNi; nucleoplasmic bridges, NPBs; nuclear buds, NBUDs) in the cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus (CBMN) cytome assay were adopted to detect chromosomal damage. PCR and PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) are adopted to analyze polymorphisms of DNA repair genes, such as X-ray repair cross-complementing Group 1 (XRCC1), O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerases (ADPRT), and apurinic/apyrimidinic endonucleases (APE1). The BD-exposed workers exhibited increased frequencies of MNi and NPBs when compared to subjects in the control group. The results also show that the BD-exposed workers carrying XRCC1 diplotypes TCGA-CCGG (4.25 ± 2.06 ‰) (FR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.03-4.28) and TCGG-TCGA (5.80 ± 3.56 ‰) (FR = 2.75, 95% CI: 0.76-2.65) had statistically higher NBUD frequencies than those who carried diplotype TCGG-TCGG (1.89 ± 1.27 ‰). Our study suggests that polymorphisms of XRCC1 gene may influence chromosomal damage in BD-exposed workers.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26339595 PMCID: PMC4538405 DOI: 10.1155/2015/234675
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
PCR primers and restricted endonucleases for each of DNA repair genes in genotyping process.
| Gene | Primers | PCR method | Restricted endonucleases | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forward | Reverse | |||
|
| 5′-GCCCCGTCCCAGGTA-3′ | 5′-AGCCCCAAGACCCTTTCACT-3′ | RFLP | MspI |
|
| 5′-TGGGGCCTGGATTGCTGGGTCTG-3′ | 5′-CAGCACCACTACCACACCCTGAAGG-3′ | RFLP | RsaI |
|
| 5′-TTGTGCTTTCTCTGTGTCCA-3′ | 5′-TCCTCCAGCCTTTTCTGATA-3′ | RFLP | MspI |
|
| 5′-GAGGAAACGCTCGTTGCTAAG-3′ | 5′-TCCTCATTAATTCCC TCACGTC-3′ | RFLP | BsrBI |
|
| 5′-TTTTGCTCCTCCAGGCCAAcG-3′ | 5′-CCTGACCCTGTTACCTTAATGTCAGTTTT-3′ | RFLP | Hinf1 |
|
| 5′-AAGAGTTCCCCGTGCCGAC-3′ | 5′-GCCAAACGCTGCCTCTGT-3′ | RFLP | HinfI |
|
| 5′-CTGTTTCATTTCTATAGGCTA-3′ | 5′-AGGAACTTGCGAAA GGCTTC-3′ | RFLP | Bfa1 |
Urinary metabolites of BD-exposed workers and controls (23 pairs).
| Exposure (p.p.b.) | Control (p.p.b.) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range | Selected percentile | Range | Selected percentile | |||||
| 25th | 50th (Median) | 75th | 25th | 50th (Median) | 75th | |||
| DHBMA | <10~1080.10 | 56.10 | 122.54* | 199.23 | <10~214.76 | <10 | 10.70 | 61.09 |
Compared between exposure group and matched controls, P < 0.01; p.p.b.: μg/L.
Distribution of genotypes and allele frequencies among 1,3-butadiene- (BD-) exposed workers.
| SNPs | Genotypes |
| Rate% | Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| TT | 30 | 66.7 | T: 0.83 |
| CT | 15 | 33.3 | C: 0.27 | |
| CC | 0 | |||
|
| ||||
|
| CC | 37 | 82.2 | C: 0.91 |
| CT | 8 | 17.8 | T: 0.09 | |
| TT | 0 | |||
|
| ||||
|
| GG | 36 | 80.0 | G: 0.88 |
| GA | 7 | 15.6 | A: 0.12 | |
| AA | 2 | 4.4 | ||
|
| ||||
|
| GG | 27 | 60.0 | G: 0.76 |
| GA | 14 | 31.1 | A: 0.24 | |
| AA | 4 | 8.9 | ||
|
| ||||
|
| TT | 15 | 33.3 | T: 0.56 |
| CT | 20 | 44.4 | C: 0.44 | |
| CC | 10 | 22.3 | ||
|
| ||||
|
| CC | 32 | 71.1 | C: 0.84 |
| CT | 12 | 26.7 | T: 0.16 | |
| TT | 1 | 2.2 | ||
|
| ||||
|
| TT | 11 | 24.4 | T: 0.54 |
| GT | 27 | 60.0 | G: 0.46 | |
| GG | 7 | 15.6 | ||
Chromosomal damage between diplotypes of XRCC1 in BD-exposed workers.
| Diplotypes |
| MN (‰) | NPB (‰) | NBUD (‰) | NDI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 9 (20.0) | 8.89 ± 4.40 | 2.44 ± 2.01 | 1.89 ± 1.27 | 2.21 ± 0.17 |
|
| 7 (15.6) | 6.14 ± 3.13 | 2.00 ± 2.38 | 3.43 ± 1.98 | 2.11 ± 0.09 |
|
| 5 (11.1) | 7.00 ± 2.24 | 3.60 ± 4.04 | 2.60 ± 1.67 | 2.22 ± 0.14 |
|
| 5 (11.1) | 8.50 ± 2.89 | 4.25 ± 2.87 | 4.25 ± 2.06* | 2.07 ± 0.11 |
|
| 4 (8.9) | 11.60 ± 4.61 | 2.40 ± 0.55 | 5.80 ± 3.56* | 2.25 ± 0.05 |
| Others | 15 (33.3) | 7.33 ± 3.54 | 2.20 ± 3.43 | 2.73 ± 2.19 | 2.25 ± 0.13 |
The diplotype is defined as the allele present at positions −77 (C/T), 194 (C/T), 280 (G/A), and 399 (G/A), respectively.
*As seen in Table 5, P < 0.05.
Association between diplotypes of XRCC1 and the frequency of nucleus buds (NBUDs).
| Name |
| 95% CI |
|
| Adjusted FRa | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | Upper | (95% CI) | ||||
| Intercept | 0.6047 | −0.3894 | 1.5988 | 1.42 | 0.2332 | |
| Gender (female) | 0.3118 | −0.2169 | 0.8405 | 1.34 | 0.2478 | 1.37 (0.81–2.32) |
| Age ( | 0.1287 | −0.4292 | 0.6865 | 0.20 | 0.6512 | 1.14 (0.65–1.99) |
| OL | −0.1447 | −0.6655 | 0.3760 | 0.30 | 0.5859 | 0.87 (0.51–1.46) |
| Smoking (no) | −0.0894 | −0.5808 | 0.4021 | 0.13 | 0.7215 | 0.91 (0.56–1.49) |
| Drinking (no) | −0.3682 | −0.8256 | 0.0891 | 2.49 | 0.1145 | 0.69 (0.44–1.09) |
|
| — | — | — | — | — | 1 |
|
| 0.5219 | −0.1652 | 1.2091 | 2.22 | 0.1366 | 1.69 (0.85–3.35) |
|
| 0.2441 | −0.4885 | 0.9767 | 0.43 | 0.5137 | 1.28 (0.61–2.66) |
|
| 0.7404 | 0.0274 | 1.4534 | 4.14 | 0.0418 | 2.10 (1.03–4.28)* |
|
| 1.0101 | 0.3804 | 1.6399 | 9.88 | 0.0017 | 2.75 (1.46–5.15)* |
| Others | 0.3530 | −0.2696 | 0.9757 | 1.23 | 0.2665 | 1.42 (0.76–2.65) |
The diplotype is defined as the allele present at positions −77 (C/T), 194 (C/T), 280 (G/A),and 399 (G/A), respectively.
Others: grouping of all diplotypes with <5% frequency.
aMultiple Poisson regression: FR adjusted by age, gender, smoking, and occupational longevity (OL).
* P < 0.05.