Literature DB >> 26339327

Artefacts at the liquid interface and their impact in miniaturized biochemical assay.

Brett Litten1, Carolyn Blackett1, Mark Wigglesworth1, Nicholas Goddard2, Peter Fielden3.   

Abstract

Droplet microfluidic technology has the potential to significantly reduce reagent use, and therefore, lower costs of assays employed in drug discovery campaigns. In addition to the reduction in costs, this technology can also reduce evaporation and contamination which are often problems seen in miniaturized microtitre plate formats. Despite these advantages, we currently advise caution in the use of these microfluidic approaches as there remains a lack of understanding of the artefacts of the systems such as reagent partitioning from droplet to carrier oil and interaction of the biological reagents with the water-oil interface. Both types of artefact can lead to inaccurate and misleading data. In this paper, we present a study of the partitioning of a number of drug-like molecules in a range of oils and evidence of protein binding at the water-oil interface which results in reduced activity of a cytochrome P450 enzyme. Data presented show that the drug-like molecules partitioned the least into fluorocarbon oils and the interaction of the 1A2 cytochrome at the water-oil interface resulted in a lower or complete absence of enzyme activity. This loss of activity of cytochrome 1A2 could be restored by the use of secondary blocking proteins although changes in the pharmacology of known 1A2 inhibitors were observed. The artefacts described here due to reagents partitioning into the carrier oil or protein binding at the water-oil interface significantly impact the potential use of these microfluidic systems as a means to carry out miniaturized biological assays, and further work is needed to understand the impact and reduction of these phenomena.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26339327      PMCID: PMC4514723          DOI: 10.1063/1.4927324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomicrofluidics        ISSN: 1932-1058            Impact factor:   2.800


  9 in total

1.  Design and application of fluorometric assays for human cytochrome P450 inhibition.

Authors:  Charles L Crespi; Vaughn P Miller; David M Stresser
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  A microfluidic device for electrofusion of biological vesicles.

Authors:  Guillaume Tresset; Shoji Takeuchi
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.838

3.  Surfactants in droplet-based microfluidics.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Baret
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 6.799

4.  Timing controllable electrofusion device for aqueous droplet-based microreactors.

Authors:  Wei-Heong Tan; Shoji Takeuchi
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 5.  Microfluidic tools for studying the specific binding, adsorption, and displacement of proteins at interfaces.

Authors:  Matthew A Holden; Paul S Cremer
Journal:  Annu Rev Phys Chem       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 12.703

6.  Controlling the retention of small molecules in emulsion microdroplets for use in cell-based assays.

Authors:  Fabienne Courtois; Luis F Olguin; Graeme Whyte; Ashleigh B Theberge; Wilhelm T S Huck; Florian Hollfelder; Chris Abell
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Characterization of sensitivity and specificity in leaky droplet-based assays.

Authors:  Yunhan Chen; Adi Wijaya Gani; Sindy K Y Tang
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 6.799

8.  Continuous two-phase flow miniaturised bioreactor for monitoring anaerobic biocatalysis by pentaerythritol tetranitrate reductase.

Authors:  Stephan Mohr; Karl Fisher; Nigel S Scrutton; Nick J Goddard; Peter R Fielden
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 6.799

9.  Key factors for stable retention of fluorophores and labeled biomolecules in droplet-based microfluidics.

Authors:  Jan-Willi Janiesch; Marian Weiss; Gerri Kannenberg; Jonathon Hannabuss; Thomas Surrey; Ilia Platzman; Joachim P Spatz
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 6.986

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Preface to Special Topic: Microfluidics in Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Brigitte Stadler
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Amphiphilic nanoparticles suppress droplet break-up in a concentrated emulsion flowing through a narrow constriction.

Authors:  Ya Gai; Minkyu Kim; Ming Pan; Sindy K Y Tang
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 2.800

3.  Quantifying phenotypes in single cells using droplet microfluidics.

Authors:  Fengjiao Lyu; Lucas R Blauch; Sindy K Y Tang
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 1.441

Review 4.  Screening applications in drug discovery based on microfluidic technology.

Authors:  P Eribol; A K Uguz; K O Ulgen
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.800

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.