Literature DB >> 12413752

Effect of rescuer fatigue on performance of continuous external chest compressions over 3 min.

A Ashton1, A McCluskey, C L Gwinnutt, A M Keenan.   

Abstract

Guidelines for the performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) have been revised recently and now advocate that chest compressions are performed without interruption for 3 min in patients during asystole and pulseless electrical activity. The aim of the present study was to determine if rescuer fatigue occurs during 3 min of chest compressions and if so, the effects on the rate and quality of compressions. Forty subjects competent in basic life support (BLS) were studied. They performed continuous chest compressions on a Laerdal Skillmeter Resusci-Anne manikin for two consecutive periods of 3 min separated by 30 s. The total number of compressions attempted was well maintained at approximately 100 min(-1) throughout the period of study. However, the number of satisfactory chest compressions performed decreased progressively during resuscitation (P < 0.001) as follows: first min, 82 min(-1); second, 68 min(-1); third, 52 min(-1); fourth, 70 min(-1); fifth, 44 min(-1); sixth, 27 min(-1). We observed significant correlations between the number of satisfactory compressions performed and both height and weight of the rescuer. Female subjects achieved significantly fewer satisfactory compressions compared with males (P = 0.03). Seven subjects (five female, two male) were unable to complete the second 3-min period because of exhaustion. We conclude that rescuer fatigue adversely affects the quality of chest compressions when performed without interruption over a 3-min period and that this effect may be greater in females due to their smaller stature. Consideration should be given to rotating the rescuer performing chest compressions after 1 min intervals. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12413752     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(02)00168-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  54 in total

1.  Performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during prolonged basic life support in military medical university students: A manikin study.

Authors:  Juan Wang; Chao-Nan Zhuo; Lei Zhang; Yu-Shun Gong; Chang-Lin Yin; Yong-Qin Li
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2015

2.  Auditory and visual prompts during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the emergency department.

Authors:  J France; S Wilson; N Whitton
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  [Chest compression quality : Can feedback technology help?].

Authors:  R P Lukas; C Sengelhoff; S Döpker; U Harding; P Mertens; N Osada; H Van Aken; T P Weber; A Bohn
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Mechanical chest compression: an alternative in helicopter emergency medical services?

Authors:  Holger Gässler; Simone Kümmerle; Marc-Michael Ventzke; Lorenz Lampl; Matthias Helm
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.397

5.  Rescuer fatigue during simulated neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  E S Li; P-Y Cheung; M O'Reilly; K Aziz; G M Schmölzer
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 2.521

6.  Correlations between quality indexes of chest compression.

Authors:  Feng-Ling Zhang; Li Yan; Su-Fang Huang; Xiang-Jun Bai
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2013

7.  Pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation and stabilization.

Authors:  Atul Jindal; M Jayashree; Sunit C Singhi
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 1.967

8.  The prevalence of chest compression leaning during in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  David A Fried; Marion Leary; Douglas A Smith; Robert M Sutton; Dana Niles; Daniel L Herzberg; Lance B Becker; Benjamin S Abella
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 5.262

9.  A randomized cross-over study of the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation among females performing 30:2 and hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Cynthia Trowbridge; Jesal N Parekh; Mark D Ricard; Jerald Potts; W Clive Patrickson; Carolyn L Cason
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2009-07-07

10.  Manual versus mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. An experimental study in pigs.

Authors:  Qiuming Liao; Trygve Sjöberg; Audrius Paskevicius; Björn Wohlfart; Stig Steen
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.