Raymond C Sinclair1, Thomas R Cunningham1. 1. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH, 45243, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Workplace injuries occur at higher rates in smaller firms than in larger firms, and the number of workplace safety activities appear to be inversely associated with those rates. Predictors of safety activities are rarely studied. METHODS: This study uses data from a national random survey of firms (n = 722) with less than 250 employees conducted in 2002. RESULTS: We found that, regardless of firm size or industry, safety activities were more common in 2002 than they were in a similar 1983 study. Having had an OSHA inspection in the last five years and firm size were stronger predictors of safety activities than industry hazardousness and manager's perceptions of hazardousness. All four variables were significant predictors (β range .19 to .28; R2 = .27). CONCLUSIONS: Further progress in the prevention of injuries in small firms will require attention to factors likely subsumed within the firm size variable, especially the relative lack of slack resources that might be devoted to safety activities.
BACKGROUND: Workplace injuries occur at higher rates in smaller firms than in larger firms, and the number of workplace safety activities appear to be inversely associated with those rates. Predictors of safety activities are rarely studied. METHODS: This study uses data from a national random survey of firms (n = 722) with less than 250 employees conducted in 2002. RESULTS: We found that, regardless of firm size or industry, safety activities were more common in 2002 than they were in a similar 1983 study. Having had an OSHA inspection in the last five years and firm size were stronger predictors of safety activities than industry hazardousness and manager's perceptions of hazardousness. All four variables were significant predictors (β range .19 to .28; R2 = .27). CONCLUSIONS: Further progress in the prevention of injuries in small firms will require attention to factors likely subsumed within the firm size variable, especially the relative lack of slack resources that might be devoted to safety activities.
Entities:
Keywords:
Safety practices; Small business; Work-related injuries; Workplace monitoring
Authors: Elizabeth Barbeau; Cora Roelofs; Richard Youngstrom; Glorian Sorensen; Anne Stoddard; Anthony D LaMontagne Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Hangsheng Liu; Rachel M Burns; Agnes G Schaefer; Teague Ruder; Christopher Nelson; Amelia M Haviland; Wayne B Gray; John Mendeloff Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Paul A Schulte; Thomas R Cunningham; Rebecca J Guerin; Brian Hennigan; Brenda Jacklitsch Journal: Ann Work Expo Health Date: 2018-09-13 Impact factor: 2.179
Authors: Natalie V Schwatka; Liliana Tenney; Miranda J Dally; Joshua Scott; Carol E Brown; David Weitzenkamp; Erin Shore; Lee S Newman Journal: Occup Health Sci Date: 2018-03
Authors: Deborah L McLellan; Alberto J Cabán-Martinez; Candace C Nelson; Nicolaas P Pronk; Jeffrey N Katz; Jennifer D Allen; Kia L Davis; Gregory R Wagner; Glorian Sorensen Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Aviroop Biswas; Colette N Severin; Peter M Smith; Ivan A Steenstra; Lynda S Robson; Benjamin C Amick Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-12-04 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Erin Shore; Natalie Schwatka; Miranda Dally; Carol E Brown; Liliana Tenney; Lee S Newman Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 2.306
Authors: Carol E Brown; Natalie Schwatka; Lynn Dexter; Miranda Dally; Erin Shore; Liliana Tenney; Lee S Newman Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 2.306