Literature DB >> 26338474

International Vascunet Validation of the Swedvasc Registry.

M Venermo1, T Lees2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: International comparison of registry data within vascular surgery has previously been published by Vascunet. One of the limitations of such comparisons is data validity and completeness, and meaningful interpretation of differences between countries can only be made if the data are robust within each of the countries studied. The Vascunet collaboration has therefore embarked on a validation exercise of international vascular registry data.
METHODS: Five out of 20 hospitals performing vascular surgery in Sweden were visited by two international validators. Independent evaluation of the procedures of carotid endarterectomy and infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair was performed, and local hospital administrative data were compared with Swedvasc registry data. External validation compared the numbers of cases in these two systems of data collection and internal validation compared data accuracy and completeness within individual patient records.
RESULTS: Hospital records identified 335 carotid and 393 abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) procedures, whereas Swedvasc identified 331 carotid and 359 AAAs. Nine carotid procedures and 64 AAA procedures were found in hospital administrative data but not in Swedvasc, and 14 carotids and 30 AAAs were found in Swedvasc but not in hospital data. External validity was 100% (95% CI 98.8-100%) for carotids and 98.8% (95% CI 96.9-99.5%) for AAAs. In internal validation, 0.8% of variables were missing in hospital data compared with Swedvasc and 4.2% were missing in Swedvasc compared with hospital data. Data contained within the data fields of Swedvasc and hospital data were the same in 97.4% (95% CI 96.3-98.3%) for carotids and 96.2% (CI 94.9-97.2%) for AAAs.
CONCLUSION: This study has provided a template for international validation of registry data and has demonstrated that Swedvasc is a highly accurate system of data collection for Swedish vascular surgery.
Copyright © 2015 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Carotid surgery; Quality improvement; Validation; Vascular registry

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26338474     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.07.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  10 in total

1.  International Validation of the Population Based Malta Vascular Registry: A Vascunet Report.

Authors:  Nikolaj Eldrup; E Sebastian Debus
Journal:  EJVES Vasc Forum       Date:  2020-05-31

2.  Variations in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Care: A Report From the International Consortium of Vascular Registries.

Authors:  Adam W Beck; Art Sedrakyan; Jialin Mao; Maarit Venermo; Rumi Faizer; Sebastian Debus; Christian-Alexander Behrendt; Salvatore Scali; Martin Altreuther; Marc Schermerhorn; Barry Beiles; Zoltan Szeberin; Nikolaj Eldrup; Gudmundur Danielsson; Ian Thomson; Pius Wigger; Martin Björck; Jack L Cronenwett; Kevin Mani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Lifestyle and Risk of Screening-Detected Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Men.

Authors:  Otto Stackelberg; Alicja Wolk; Ken Eliasson; Anders Hellberg; Adam Bersztel; Susanna C Larsson; Nicola Orsini; Anders Wanhainen; Martin Björck
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Comparative analysis of the outcomes of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in England and Sweden.

Authors:  A Karthikesalingam; M J Grima; P J Holt; A Vidal-Diez; M M Thompson; A Wanhainen; M Bjorck; K Mani
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 5.  Treatment of aortic aneurysms registered in Swedvasc: Development reflected in a national vascular registry with an almost 100% coverage.

Authors:  D Bergqvist; K Mani; T Troëng; A Wanhainen
Journal:  Gefasschirurgie       Date:  2018-08-13

6.  Routine open abdomen treatment compared with on-demand open abdomen or direct closure following open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: A propensity score-matched study.

Authors:  Kristian Smidfelt; Joakim Nordanstig; Urban Wingren; Göran Bergström; Marcus Langenskiöld
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2019-02-25

Review 7.  [Treatment reality of aortic diseases in Switzerland].

Authors:  L Meuli; T Lattmann
Journal:  Gefasschirurgie       Date:  2021-06-01

8.  Open or endovascular revascularization in the treatment of acute lower limb ischaemia.

Authors:  O Grip; A Wanhainen; K Michaëlsson; L Lindhagen; M Björck
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Ruptured popliteal artery aneurysm.

Authors:  A Cervin; H Ravn; M Björck
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Eight-year outcome after invasive treatment of infrainguinal intermittent claudication: A population-based analysis from the Swedish vascular register (Swedvasc).

Authors:  Thordur Gunnarsson; Anders Gottsäter; Stefan Bergman; Thomas Troëng; Hans Lindgren
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2020-05-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.