Literature DB >> 26338341

Spatiotemporal Coding of Individual Chemicals by the Gustatory System.

Sam Reiter1, Chelsey Campillo Rodriguez2, Kui Sun2, Mark Stopfer3.   

Abstract

Four of the five major sensory systems (vision, olfaction, somatosensation, and audition) are thought to use different but partially overlapping sets of neurons to form unique representations of vast numbers of stimuli. The only exception is gustation, which is thought to represent only small numbers of basic taste categories. However, using new methods for delivering tastant chemicals and making electrophysiological recordings from the tractable gustatory system of the moth Manduca sexta, we found chemical-specific information is as follows: (1) initially encoded in the population of gustatory receptor neurons as broadly distributed spatiotemporal patterns of activity; (2) dramatically integrated and temporally transformed as it propagates to monosynaptically connected second-order neurons; and (3) observed in tastant-specific behavior. Our results are consistent with an emerging view of the gustatory system: rather than constructing basic taste categories, it uses a spatiotemporal population code to generate unique neural representations of individual tastant chemicals. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Our results provide a new view of taste processing. Using a new, relatively simple model system and a new set of techniques to deliver taste stimuli and to examine gustatory receptor neurons and their immediate followers, we found no evidence for labeled line connectivity, or basic taste categories such as sweet, salty, bitter, and sour. Rather, individual tastant chemicals are represented as patterns of spiking activity distributed across populations of receptor neurons. These representations are transformed substantially as multiple types of receptor neurons converge upon follower neurons, leading to a combinatorial coding format that uniquely, rapidly, and efficiently represents individual taste chemicals. Finally, we found that the information content of these neurons can drive tastant-specific behavior.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/3512309-13$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  neural coding; taste

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26338341      PMCID: PMC4556795          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3802-14.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  65 in total

Review 1.  Peripheral and central structures involved in insect gustation.

Authors:  B K Mitchell; H Itagaki; M P Rivet
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 2.769

Review 2.  The evolution and implications of population and modular neural coding ideas.

Authors:  R P Erickson
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.453

3.  Physiology of a primary chemoreceptor unit.

Authors:  E S HODGSON; J Y LETTVIN; K D ROEDER
Journal:  Science       Date:  1955-09-02       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Temporal coding mediates discrimination of "bitter" taste stimuli by an insect.

Authors:  John I Glendinning; Adrienne Davis; Meelu Rai
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  A simple connectivity scheme for sparse coding in an olfactory system.

Authors:  Ron A Jortner; S Sarah Farivar; Gilles Laurent
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Central gustatory neurons integrate taste quality information from four appendages in the moth Heliothis virescens.

Authors:  Pål Kvello; Kari Jørgensen; Hanna Mustaparta
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  The sixth taste?

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.868

8.  Candidate codes in the gustatory system of caterpillars.

Authors:  V G Dethier; R M Crnjar
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  Acid sensing by sweet and bitter taste neurons in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Sandhya Charlu; Zev Wisotsky; Adriana Medina; Anupama Dahanukar
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  An analysis of hamster afferent taste nerve response functions.

Authors:  M Frank
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  15 in total

1.  Gustatory receptor 28b is necessary for avoiding saponin in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Jiun Sang; Suman Rimal; Youngseok Lee
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 2.  Gustatory processing and taste memory in Drosophila.

Authors:  Pavel Masek; Alex C Keene
Journal:  J Neurogenet       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.250

3.  Taste sensing and sugar detection mechanisms in Drosophila larval primary taste center.

Authors:  G Larisa Maier; Nikita Komarov; Felix Meyenhofer; Jae Young Kwon; Simon G Sprecher
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Complex representation of taste quality by second-order gustatory neurons in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Snell; John D Fisher; Griffin G Hartmann; Bence Zolyomi; Mustafa Talay; Gilad Barnea
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 10.900

5.  Temporal responses of bumblebee gustatory neurons to sugars.

Authors:  Rachel H Parkinson; Sébastien C Kessler; Jennifer Scott; Alexander Simpson; Jennifer Bu; Mushtaq Al-Esawy; Adam Mahdi; Ashwin Miriyala; Geraldine A Wright
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-06-02

6.  Molecular and functional basis of high-salt avoidance in a blood-sucking insect.

Authors:  Gina Pontes; José Manuel Latorre-Estivalis; María Laura Gutiérrez; Agustina Cano; Martin Berón de Astrada; Marcelo G Lorenzo; Romina B Barrozo
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-06-02

Review 7.  Contact chemosensation of phytochemicals by insect herbivores.

Authors:  Stefan Pentzold; Antje Burse; Wilhelm Boland
Journal:  Nat Prod Rep       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 13.423

Review 8.  Drosophila Bitter Taste(s).

Authors:  Alice French; Moutaz Ali Agha; Aniruddha Mitra; Aya Yanagawa; Marie-Jeanne Sellier; Frédéric Marion-Poll
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-25

9.  Hawkmoths evaluate scenting flowers with the tip of their proboscis.

Authors:  Alexander Haverkamp; Felipe Yon; Ian W Keesey; Christine Mißbach; Christopher Koenig; Bill S Hansson; Ian T Baldwin; Markus Knaden; Danny Kessler
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Odor-evoked inhibition of olfactory sensory neurons drives olfactory perception in Drosophila.

Authors:  Li-Hui Cao; Dong Yang; Wei Wu; Xiankun Zeng; Bi-Yang Jing; Meng-Tong Li; Shanshan Qin; Chao Tang; Yuhai Tu; Dong-Gen Luo
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.