| Literature DB >> 26338041 |
Bekir Karakilic1, Emin Taskiran2, Basak Doganavsargil3, Bora Uzun4, Salih Celik5, Elcil Kaya Bicer6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The mid-substance central defect injury has been used to investigate the primary healing capacity of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in a goat model. The sagittal plane stability on this model has not been confirmed, and possible effects of fat pad excision on healing have not been evaluated. We hypothesize that excising the fat pad tissue results in poorer ligament healing as assessed histologically and decreased tensile strength of the healing ligament. We further hypothesize that the creation of a central defect does not affect sagittal plane knee stability.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26338041 PMCID: PMC4558767 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-015-0281-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Fig. 1Creating central defect in ACL
Fig. 2Excised full thicknees tissue from ACL for central defect
Fig. 3Fat pad excision
Fig. 4Anterior tibial translation test data of a sample
Fig. 5Tensile load to failure data of a sample
Fig. 6Microscopic section showing the filled defect area surrounded by vascular proliferation (arrows) and normal ligament tissue (stars)
Vascular structures per micro observation site
| Sample | Vascular count |
|---|---|
| A3—Experiment knee | 25 |
| A3—Control | 11 |
| B1—Experiment knee | 46 |
| B1—Control | 25 |
Fig. 7Microscopic section showing the defect area of fat-pad excised sample: having edema and myxoid degeneration fields
Collagen type 1 stained fiber count
| Sample | Fiber count |
|---|---|
| A3—Experiment knee | 69 |
| A3—Control | 68 |
| B1—Experiment knee | 88 |
| B1—Control | 42 |
Group A mean ATT values (mm)
| Subject | Experiment knee | Control knee |
|---|---|---|
| A-1 | 6.4117 | 0.8788 |
| A-2 | 4.1572 | 2.8145 |
| A-4 | 3.1554 | 5.907 |
| A-5 | 3.3138 | 4.4311 |
A-3 undergone pathologic assessment
Group B mean ATT values (mm)
| Subject | Experiment knee | Control knee |
|---|---|---|
| B-2 | 2.613 | 4.4991 |
| B-3 | 3.4019 | 2.1616 |
| B-4 | 3.1074 | 1.9328 |
| B-5 | 3.2669 | 2.9025 |
B-1 undergone pathologic assessment
Group A tensile test values
| Subject | Ultimate tensile load (N) | Ultimate elongation (mm) | Stiffness (N/meter) | Failure mode | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment knee | Control knee | Experiment knee | Control knee | Experiment knee | Control knee | Experiment knee | Control knee | |
| A-1 | 466.719 | 607.656 | 10.629 | 8.258 | 43,909.963 | 73,583.919 | Distal ligament attachment | Distal ligament attachment |
| A-2 | 645.625 | 745.625 | 9.6295 | 7.202 | 67,046.576 | 103,530.27 | Tibial avulsion | Distal ligament attachment |
| A-4 | 649.688 | 627.344 | 11.622 | 12.363 | 51,901.566 | 50,743.671 | Femur metaphysis | Femur metaphysis |
| A-5 | 312.031 | 273.438 | 5.521 | 5.841 | 56,517.116 | 46,813.559 | Tibial avulsion | Tibial avulsion |
Group B tensile test values
| Subject | Ultimate tensile load (N) | Ultimate elongation (mm) | Stiffness (N/meter) | Failure mode | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment knee | Control knee | Experiment knee | Control knee | Experiment knee | Control knee | Experiment knee | Control knee | |
| B-2 | 465.313 | 500.938 | 5.379 | 7.535 | 86,505.484 | 66,481.486 | Tibial avulsion | Tibial avulsion |
| B-3 | 790.625 | 717.813 | 8.079 | 8.802 | 97,861.74 | 81,551.125 | Tibial avulsion | Tibial avulsion |
| B-4 | 525 | 580.469 | 8.355 | 5.235 | 62,836,625 | 110,882.33 | Distal ligament attachment | Distal ligament attachment |
| B-5 | 418.438 | 527.344 | 5.634 | 6.608 | 74,270.146 | 79,803.874 | Tibial avulsion | Tibial avulsion |