Literature DB >> 12798072

The effect of initial graft tension on the biomechanical properties of a healing ACL replacement graft: a study in goats.

Steven D Abramowitch1, Christos D Papageorgiou, John D Withrow, Thomas W Gilbert, Savio L-Y Woo.   

Abstract

While a number of in vitro studies have shown that the tension on an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) replacement graft at the time of fixation has an affect on joint stability, most in vivo studies have reported little or no long-term difference in outcome. The objectives of this study were to (1) establish a large animal model in which differences in knee stability are present at time-zero after ACL reconstruction with grafts fixed at a low (5 N) and high (35 N) initial tension and to (2) quantitatively determine if these initial effects remain after six weeks of healing and if the tensile properties of an ACL replacement graft are influenced by initial graft tension. Seventeen skeletally mature female Saanan breed goats were used. Using the robotic/UFS testing system, the knee kinematics and in situ forces in the replacement graft in response to an externally applied 67 N anterior-posterior (A-P) tibial load were evaluated at time-zero and after six weeks of healing. Afterward, the femur-ACL graft-tibia complexes (FGTCs) from the six-week group were tested under uniaxial tension so that the stress relaxation and structural properties of the FGTC were obtained. At time-zero, knees fixed with a high initial graft tension could better reproduce the A-P translation of the intact knee in response to the 67 N A-P tibial load. Further, in situ forces in these grafts were also closer to those in the intact ACL under the same external loading condition. After six weeks of healing, the A-P translation of the knee and in situ forces in the replacement grafts became similar for the low and high tension groups, while both were significantly different from controls. Further, the percentage of stress relaxation as well as the stiffness, ultimate load at failure, ultimate elongation at failure, and energy absorbed of the FGTCs for both reconstruction groups were not significantly different from each other, but were significantly different from controls. These results demonstrate that while the high initial graft tension could better replicate the normal knee kinematics at time-zero, these effects may diminish during the early graft healing process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12798072     DOI: 10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00265-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  24 in total

1.  Anterior crucial ligament rupture: self-healing through dynamic intraligamentary stabilization technique.

Authors:  Sandro Kohl; Dimitrios S Evangelopoulos; Hendrik Kohlhof; Max Hartel; Harald Bonel; Phillip Henle; Brigitte von Rechenberg; Stefan Eggli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  [Cost analysis of implant-free replacement of anterior cruciate ligament].

Authors:  G Frenzel; H Wuschech; G Felmet; E Ingenhoven; M Schmidt; J-J Ziesche
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Pretensioning of quadruple flexor tendon grafts in two types of femoral fixation: quasi-randomised controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Cezar Teruyuki Kawano; Patrícia Maria de Moraes Barros Fucs; Nilson Roberto Severino
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Biomechanics of the goat three bundle anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  T Tischer; M Ronga; A Tsai; S J M Ingham; M Ekdahl; P Smolinski; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Graft healing in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Max Ekdahl; James H-C Wang; Mario Ronga; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Anatomic double-bundle versus single-bundle ACL reconstruction: a comparative biomechanical study in rabbits.

Authors:  Vassilios S Nikolaou; Nicolas Efstathopoulos; Ioannis Sourlas; Anastasia Pilichou; Georgios Papachristou
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Healing of the goat anterior cruciate ligament after a new suture repair technique and bioscaffold treatment.

Authors:  D Tan Nguyen; Jurre Geel; Martin Schulze; Michael J Raschke; Savio L-Y Woo; C Niek van Dijk; Leendert Blankevoort
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  Biomechanics of the porcine triple bundle anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Yuki Kato; Sheila J M Ingham; Monica Linde-Rosen; Patrick Smolinski; Takashi Horaguchi; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  A biomechanical comparison of the Delta screw and RetroScrew tibial fixation on initial intra-articular graft tension.

Authors:  Peter C Rhee; Bruce A Levy; Michael J Stuart; Andrew Thoreson; Kai-Nan An; Diane L Dahm
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  ACL reconstruction with physiological graft tension by intraoperative adjustment of the anteroposterior translation to the uninjured contralateral knee.

Authors:  Johannes Dominik Bastian; Salvatore Tomagra; Andreas J Schuster; Stefan Werlen; Roland P Jakob; Matthias A Zumstein
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.