OBJECTIVE: The cumulative standardized uptake value (SUV)-volume histogram (CSH) was reported to be a novel way to characterize heterogeneity in intratumoral tracer uptake. This study investigated the value of fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) intratumoral heterogeneity in comparison with SUV to discriminate between primary benign and malignant musculoskeletal (MS) tumours. METHODS: The subjects comprised 85 pathologically proven MS tumours. The area under the curve of CSH (AUC-CSH) was used as a heterogeneity index, with lower values corresponding with increased heterogeneity. As 22 tumours were indiscernible on (18)F-FDG positron emission tomography, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) and AUC-CSH were obtained in 63 positive tumours. The Mann-Whitney U test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used for analyses. RESULTS: The difference between benign (n = 35) and malignant tumours (n = 28) was significant in AUC-CSH (p = 0.004), but not in SUVmax (p = 0.168) and SUVmean (p = 0.879). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for diagnosing malignancy were 61%, 66% and 64% for SUVmax (optical threshold value, >6.9), 54%, 60% and 57% for SUVmean (optical threshold value, >3) and 61%, 86% and 75% for AUC-CSH (optical threshold value, ≤0.42), respectively. The area under the ROC curve was significantly higher in AUC-CSH (0.71) than SUVmax (0.60) (p = 0.018) and SUVmean (0.51) (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The heterogeneity index, AUC-CSH, has a higher diagnostic accuracy than SUV analysis in differentiating between primary benign and malignant MS tumours, although it is not sufficiently high enough to obviate histological analysis. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: AUC-CSH can assess the heterogeneity of (18)F-FDG uptake in primary benign and malignant MS tumours, with significantly greater heterogeneity associated with malignant MS tumours. AUC-CSH is more diagnostically accurate than SUV analysis in differentiating between benign and malignant MS tumours.
OBJECTIVE: The cumulative standardized uptake value (SUV)-volume histogram (CSH) was reported to be a novel way to characterize heterogeneity in intratumoral tracer uptake. This study investigated the value of fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) intratumoral heterogeneity in comparison with SUV to discriminate between primary benign and malignant musculoskeletal (MS) tumours. METHODS: The subjects comprised 85 pathologically proven MS tumours. The area under the curve of CSH (AUC-CSH) was used as a heterogeneity index, with lower values corresponding with increased heterogeneity. As 22 tumours were indiscernible on (18)F-FDG positron emission tomography, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) and AUC-CSH were obtained in 63 positive tumours. The Mann-Whitney U test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used for analyses. RESULTS: The difference between benign (n = 35) and malignant tumours (n = 28) was significant in AUC-CSH (p = 0.004), but not in SUVmax (p = 0.168) and SUVmean (p = 0.879). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for diagnosing malignancy were 61%, 66% and 64% for SUVmax (optical threshold value, >6.9), 54%, 60% and 57% for SUVmean (optical threshold value, >3) and 61%, 86% and 75% for AUC-CSH (optical threshold value, ≤0.42), respectively. The area under the ROC curve was significantly higher in AUC-CSH (0.71) than SUVmax (0.60) (p = 0.018) and SUVmean (0.51) (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The heterogeneity index, AUC-CSH, has a higher diagnostic accuracy than SUV analysis in differentiating between primary benign and malignant MS tumours, although it is not sufficiently high enough to obviate histological analysis. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: AUC-CSH can assess the heterogeneity of (18)F-FDG uptake in primary benign and malignant MS tumours, with significantly greater heterogeneity associated with malignant MS tumours. AUC-CSH is more diagnostically accurate than SUV analysis in differentiating between benign and malignant MS tumours.
Authors: Floris H P van Velden; Patsuree Cheebsumon; Maqsood Yaqub; Egbert F Smit; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Ronald Boellaard Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-05-27 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: J Aoki; H Watanabe; T Shinozaki; K Takagishi; H Ishijima; N Oya; N Sato; T Inoue; K Endo Journal: Radiology Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: M H Schwarzbach; A Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss; F Willeke; U Hinz; L G Strauss; Y M Zhang; G Mechtersheimer; N Attigah; T Lehnert; C Herfarth Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: H Watanabe; T Shinozaki; T Yanagawa; J Aoki; M Tokunaga; T Inoue; K Endo; S Mohara; K Sano; K Takagishi Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Br Date: 2000-07
Authors: K Strobel; U E Exner; K D M Stumpe; T F Hany; B Bode; K Mende; P Veit-Haibach; G K von Schulthess; Juerg Hodler Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2008-08-20 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Gary J R Cook; Eitan Lovat; Muhammad Siddique; Vicky Goh; Rosalie Ferner; Victoria S Warbey Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-06-07 Impact factor: 9.236