Literature DB >> 26337427

Cystocele and functional anatomy of the pelvic floor: review and update of the various theories.

Géry Lamblin1,2,3, Emmanuel Delorme4, Michel Cosson5,6, Chrystèle Rubod5,6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We updated anatomic theories of pelvic organ support to determine pathophysiology in various forms of cystocele.
METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched using the terms pelvic floor, cystocele, anatomy, connective tissue, endopelvic fascia, and pelvic mobility. We retrieved 612 articles, of which 61 matched our topic and thus were selected. Anatomic structures of bladder support and their roles in cystocele onset were determined on the international anatomic classification; the various anatomic theories of pelvic organ support were reviewed and a synthesis was made of theories of cystocele pathophysiology.
RESULTS: Anterior vaginal support structures comprise pubocervical fascia, tendinous arcs, endopelvic fascia, and levator ani muscle. DeLancey's theory was based on anatomic models and, later, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), establishing a three-level anatomopathologic definition of prolapse. Petros's integral theory demonstrated interdependence between pelvic organ support systems, linking ligament-fascia lesions, and clinical expression. Apical cystocele is induced by failure of the pubocervical fascia and insertion of its cervical ring; lower cystocele is induced by pubocervical fascia (medial cystocele) or endopelvic fascia failure at its arcus tendineus fasciae pelvis attachment (lateral cystocele).
CONCLUSIONS: Improved anatomic knowledge of vaginal wall support mechanisms will improve understanding of cystocele pathophysiology, diagnosis of the various types, and surgical techniques. The two most relevant theories, DeLancey's and Petros's, are complementary, enriching knowledge of pelvic functional anatomy, but differ in mechanism. Three-dimensional digital models could integrate and assess the mechanical properties of each anatomic structure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomy; Connective tissue; Cystocele; Endopelvic fascia; Pelvic floor; Pelvic mobility

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26337427     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-015-2832-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  59 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of pelvic ligaments: a biomechanics study.

Authors:  Géraldine Rivaux; Chrystèle Rubod; Bruno Dedet; Mathias Brieu; Boris Gabriel; Michel Cosson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Vaginal tissue properties versus increased intra-abdominal pressure: a preliminary biomechanical study.

Authors:  Pedro A L S Martins; Renato M Natal Jorge; António J M Ferreia; Cristina S Saleme; Thuane Roza; Marco M P Parente; Marcos Pinotti; Teresa Mascarenhas; Agostinho Santos; Liliana Santos; Agnaldo L Silva-Filho
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Female pelvic floor anatomy: the pelvic floor, supporting structures, and pelvic organs.

Authors:  Sender Herschorn
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

4.  Endopelvic fascia in women: shape and relation to parietal pelvic structures.

Authors:  Michal Otcenasek; Vaclav Baca; Ladislav Krofta; Jaroslav Feyereisl
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  The visceral endopelvic fascia and the hypogastric sheath.

Authors:  E UHLENHUTH; E C DAY
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1948-01

Review 6.  Pelvic floor disorders: linking genetic risk factors to biochemical changes.

Authors:  Lysanne Campeau; Ilya Gorbachinsky; Gopal H Badlani; Karl Erik Andersson
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  New insights into the pelvic organ support framework.

Authors:  Tanvaa Tansatit; Prawit Apinuntrum; Thavorn Phetudom; Piyaporn Phanchart
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 2.435

8.  Differences in the quantity of elastic fibres and collagen type I and type III in endopelvic fascia between women with stress urinary incontinence and controls.

Authors:  Andrej Cör; Matija Barbic; Bozo Kralj
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2003-04-02

9.  Anatomic study of arcus tendineus fasciae pelvis.

Authors:  B Occelli; F Narducci; J Hautefeuille; J P Francke; D Querleu; G Crépin; M Cosson
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.435

10.  Anterior vaginal wall length and degree of anterior compartment prolapse seen on dynamic MRI.

Authors:  Yvonne Hsu; Luyun Chen; Aimee Summers; James A Ashton-Miller; John O L DeLancey; James O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-06-20
View more
  9 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of paravaginal defect repair with and without apical suspension: a 6-month postoperative follow-up with MRI, clinical examination, and questionnaires.

Authors:  Louise T S Arenholt; Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen; Karin Glavind; Susanne Greisen; Karl M Bek; Marianne Glavind-Kristensen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Structural, functional, and symptomatic differences between women with rectocele versus cystocele and normal support.

Authors:  Mitchell B Berger; Giselle E Kolenic; Dee E Fenner; Daniel M Morgan; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  A retrospective comparison of two vaginal mesh kits in the management of anterior and apical vaginal prolapse: long-term results for apical fixation and quality of life.

Authors:  Gery Lamblin; Chloé Gouttenoire; Laure Panel; Stéphanie Moret; Gautier Chene; Christophe Courtieu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Modern Theories of Pelvic Floor Support : A Topical Review of Modern Studies on Structural and Functional Pelvic Floor Support from Medical Imaging, Computational Modeling, and Electromyographic Perspectives.

Authors:  Yun Peng; Brandi D Miller; Timothy B Boone; Yingchun Zhang
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Prosthetic surgery versus native tissue repair of cystocele: literature review.

Authors:  Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Antonio Simone Laganà; Ferdinando Antonio Gulino; Alessandro Tropea; Susanna Tarda
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-01-22

6.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging evaluation before and after operation for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Hongbo Zhang; Zeyan Wang; Xuehong Xiao; Jing Wang; Beibei Zhou
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-12-06

7.  Ultrasound imaging of the perineal body: a useful clinical tool.

Authors:  Victoria Asfour; Giuseppe Alessandro Digesu; Ruwan Fernando; Vik Khullar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 8.  The Most Common Functional Disorders and Factors Affecting Female Pelvic Floor.

Authors:  Sabina Tim; Agnieszka I Mazur-Bialy
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-14

9.  Association between overactive bladder and pelvic organ mobility as evaluated by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kurenai Kinno; Noritoshi Sekido; Yasuharu Takeuchi; Yoshitomo Sawada; Shoutarou Watanabe; Yasukuni Yoshimura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.