Richard Watson1, Walt Gray2, William E Sponsel3, Brian J Lund4, Randolph D Glickman5, Sylvia L Groth6, Matthew A Reilly7. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA ; Biodynamic Research Corporation, San Antonio, TX, USA. 2. Department of Geological Sciences, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA ; WESMD Professional Associates, San Antonio, TX, USA ; Rosenberg School of Optometry, University of the Incarnate Word, San Antonio, TX, USA. 4. U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, USA. 5. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA. 6. Department of Ophthalmology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 7. Department of Biomedical Engineering University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A computational model of the porcine eye was developed to simulate primary blast exposure. This model facilitates understanding of blast-induced injury mechanisms. METHODS: A computational model of the porcine eye was used to simulate the effects of primary blast loading for comparison with experimental findings from shock tube experiments. The eye model was exposed to overpressure-time histories measured during physical experiments. Deformations and mechanical stresses within various ocular tissues were then examined for correlation with pathological findings in the experiments. RESULTS: Stresses and strains experienced in the eye during a primary blast event increase as the severity of the blast exposure increases. Peak stresses in the model occurred in locations in which damage was most often observed in the physical experiments. CONCLUSIONS: Blast injuries to the anterior chamber may be due to inertial displacement of the lens and ciliary body while posterior damage may arise due to contrecoup interactions of the vitreous and retina. Correlation of modeling predictions with physical experiments lends confidence that the model accurately represents the conditions found in the physical experiments. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: This computational model offers insights into the mechanisms of ocular injuries arising due to primary blast and may be used to simulate the effects of new protective eyewear designs.
PURPOSE: A computational model of the porcine eye was developed to simulate primary blast exposure. This model facilitates understanding of blast-induced injury mechanisms. METHODS: A computational model of the porcine eye was used to simulate the effects of primary blast loading for comparison with experimental findings from shock tube experiments. The eye model was exposed to overpressure-time histories measured during physical experiments. Deformations and mechanical stresses within various ocular tissues were then examined for correlation with pathological findings in the experiments. RESULTS: Stresses and strains experienced in the eye during a primary blast event increase as the severity of the blast exposure increases. Peak stresses in the model occurred in locations in which damage was most often observed in the physical experiments. CONCLUSIONS: Blast injuries to the anterior chamber may be due to inertial displacement of the lens and ciliary body while posterior damage may arise due to contrecoup interactions of the vitreous and retina. Correlation of modeling predictions with physical experiments lends confidence that the model accurately represents the conditions found in the physical experiments. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: This computational model offers insights into the mechanisms of ocular injuries arising due to primary blast and may be used to simulate the effects of new protective eyewear designs.
Authors: Walt Gray; William E Sponsel; Frank W Scribbick; Amber R Stern; Carl E Weiss; Sylvia L Groth; James D Walker Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-09-29 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: William E Sponsel; Walt Gray; Sylvia L Groth; Amber R Stern; James D Walker Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-12-20 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Allen B Thach; Anthony J Johnson; Robert B Carroll; Ava Huchun; Darryl J Ainbinder; Richard D Stutzman; Sean M Blaydon; Sheri L Demartelaere; Thomas H Mader; Clifton S Slade; Roger K George; John P Ritchey; Scott D Barnes; Lilia A Fannin Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2007-09-27 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Matthew M Harper; Addison W Woll; Lucy P Evans; Michael Delcau; Abhigna Akurathi; Adam Hedberg-Buenz; Dana A Soukup; Nickolas Boehme; Marco M Hefti; Laura M Dutca; Michael G Anderson; Alexander G Bassuk Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 4.799