Literature DB >> 26335428

The prognostic legacy of left ventricular hypertrophy: cumulative evidence after the MAVI study.

Fabio Angeli1, Gianpaolo Reboldi, Cristina Poltronieri, Elisa Stefanetti, Claudia Bartolini, Paolo Verdecchia.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although regression of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) confers a marked prognostic benefit, it is unknown whether cardiovascular risk in these patients is comparable to those who never developed LVH.
METHODS: We analyzed the 'Massa Ventricolare sinistra nell'Ipertensione' (MAVI) study, a prospective study in which serial changes in left ventricular mass at echocardiography were associated with subsequent cardiovascular events. We also conducted a cumulative meta-analysis in order to investigate how evidence progressed in this field. We defined three phenotypes: persistently normal left ventricular mass; LVH regression; persistence/new development of LVH.
RESULTS: Left ventricular mass was measured at baseline and 2 years after the initial assessment in 374 patients (64% women). Clinical outcomes were ascertained after the 2-year echocardiographic evaluation (mean follow-up 3.2 years). Persistence or new development of LVH was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events (odds ratio 1.96, 95% confidence interval 1.07-3.57, P = 0.029). In a cumulative meta-analyses that included MAVI and six comparable studies for a total of 2954 patients and 339 cardiovascular events, when a persistently normal left ventricular mass was taken as reference, regression of LVH was associated with 56% higher risk of cardiovascular events (odds ratio 1.56, 95% confidence interval 1.04-2.36, absolute risk increase 3%, P = 0.033). Conversely, evidence accrued from previous studies that persistence or new development of LVH predicts an adverse outcome did not change after MAVI.
CONCLUSIONS: Cardiovascular risk is higher in patients with LVH regression than in those with persistently normal left ventricular mass. Preventing development of LVH is thus an important target.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26335428     DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  5 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic Significance of Echocardiographic Measures of Cardiac Remodeling in the Community.

Authors:  Ramachandran S Vasan; Elman Martin Urbina; Ling Jin; Vanessa Xanthakis
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Left ventricular hypertrophy in association with cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marios K Georgakis; Andreas Synetos; Constantinos Mihas; Maria A Karalexi; Dimitrios Tousoulis; Sudha Seshadri; Eleni Th Petridou
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.872

3.  Left Ventricular Mass at MRI and Long-term Risk of Cardiovascular Events: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).

Authors:  Nadine Kawel-Boehm; Richard Kronmal; John Eng; Aaron Folsom; Gregory Burke; J Jeffrey Carr; Steven Shea; João A C Lima; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 29.146

4.  Prognostic value of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients: A meta-analysis of electrocardiographic studies.

Authors:  Hongsheng Zhang; Lingai Hu; Xiqing Wei
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-01-19       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Long-term effect of the perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine single-pill combination on left ventricular hypertrophy in outpatient hypertensive subjects.

Authors:  Alberto Mazza; Danyelle M Townsend; Laura Schiavon; Gioia Torin; Salvatore Lenti; Ciro Rossetti; Gianluca Rigatelli; Domenico Rubello
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 6.529

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.