Doyle M Cummings1, Jia-Rong Wu2, Crystal Cene3, Jacquie Halladay4, Katrina E Donahue4, Alan Hinderliter5, Cassandra Miller6, Beverly Garcia6, Dolly Penn7, Jim Tillman8, Darren DeWalt9. 1. Department of Family Medicine, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, and School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 2. School of Nursing, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 3. Department of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 4. Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 5. Division of Cardiology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 6. Center for Health Promotion/Disease Prevention, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 7. Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 8. Community Care Plan of Eastern Carolina, Greenville, North Carolina. 9. CMS Innovation Center, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Little is known about how perceived social standing versus traditional socioeconomic characteristics influence medication adherence and blood pressure (BP) among African American and white patients with hypertension in the rural southeastern United States. METHODS: Perceived social standing, socioeconomic characteristics, self-reported antihypertensive medication adherence, and BP were measured at baseline in a cohort of rural African American and white patients (n = 495) with uncontrolled hypertension attending primary care practices. Multivariate models examined the relationship of perceived social standing and socioeconomic indicators with medication adherence and systolic BP. FINDINGS: Medication nonadherence was reported by 40% of patients. Younger age [β = 0.20; P = .001], African American race [β = -0.30; P = .03], and lower perceived social standing [β = 0.08; P = .002] but not sex or traditional socioeconomic characteristics including education and household income, were significantly associated with lower medication adherence. Race-specific analyses revealed that this pattern was limited to African Americans and not observed in whites. In stepwise modeling, older age [β = 0.57, P = .001], African American race [β = 4.4; P = .03], and lower medication adherence [β = -1.7, P = .01] but not gender, education, or household income, were significantly associated with higher systolic BP. CONCLUSIONS: Lower perceived social standing and age, but not traditional socioeconomic characteristics, were significantly associated with lower medication adherence in African Americans. Lower medication adherence was associated with higher systolic BP. These findings suggest the need for tailored, culturally relevant medication adherence interventions in rural communities.
PURPOSE: Little is known about how perceived social standing versus traditional socioeconomic characteristics influence medication adherence and blood pressure (BP) among African American and white patients with hypertension in the rural southeastern United States. METHODS: Perceived social standing, socioeconomic characteristics, self-reported antihypertensive medication adherence, and BP were measured at baseline in a cohort of rural African American and white patients (n = 495) with uncontrolled hypertension attending primary care practices. Multivariate models examined the relationship of perceived social standing and socioeconomic indicators with medication adherence and systolic BP. FINDINGS: Medication nonadherence was reported by 40% of patients. Younger age [β = 0.20; P = .001], African American race [β = -0.30; P = .03], and lower perceived social standing [β = 0.08; P = .002] but not sex or traditional socioeconomic characteristics including education and household income, were significantly associated with lower medication adherence. Race-specific analyses revealed that this pattern was limited to African Americans and not observed in whites. In stepwise modeling, older age [β = 0.57, P = .001], African American race [β = 4.4; P = .03], and lower medication adherence [β = -1.7, P = .01] but not gender, education, or household income, were significantly associated with higher systolic BP. CONCLUSIONS: Lower perceived social standing and age, but not traditional socioeconomic characteristics, were significantly associated with lower medication adherence in African Americans. Lower medication adherence was associated with higher systolic BP. These findings suggest the need for tailored, culturally relevant medication adherence interventions in rural communities.
Authors: Hayden B Bosworth; Tara Dudley; Maren K Olsen; Corrine I Voils; Benjamin Powers; Mary K Goldstein; Eugene Z Oddone Journal: Am J Med Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Hayden B Bosworth; Bradi B Granger; Phil Mendys; Ralph Brindis; Rebecca Burkholder; Susan M Czajkowski; Jodi G Daniel; Inger Ekman; Michael Ho; Mimi Johnson; Stephen E Kimmel; Larry Z Liu; John Musaus; William H Shrank; Elizabeth Whalley Buono; Karen Weiss; Christopher B Granger Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Malavika A Subramanyam; Ana V Diez-Roux; Demarc A Hickson; Daniel F Sarpong; Mario Sims; Herman A Taylor; David R Williams; Sharon B Wyatt Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2012-02-14 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Doyle M Cummings; Abraham J Letter; George Howard; Virginia J Howard; Monika M Safford; Valerie Prince; Paul Muntner Journal: J Am Soc Hypertens Date: 2013-07-30
Authors: John F Steiner; P Michael Ho; Brenda L Beaty; L Miriam Dickinson; Rebecca Hanratty; Chan Zeng; Heather M Tavel; Edward P Havranek; Arthur J Davidson; David J Magid; Raymond O Estacio Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2009-08-11
Authors: Jacquie R Halladay; Katrina E Donahue; Alan L Hinderliter; Doyle M Cummings; Crystal W Cene; Cassie L Miller; Beverly A Garcia; Jim Tillman; Darren DeWalt Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2013-10-25 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Macarius M Donneyong; Michael A Fischer; Michael A Langston; Joshua J Joseph; Paul D Juarez; Ping Zhang; David M Kline Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-02 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Donald K Hayes; Sandra L Jackson; Yanfeng Li; Gregory Wozniak; Stavros Tsipas; Yuling Hong; Angela M Thompson-Paul; Hilary K Wall; Cathleen Gillespie; Brent M Egan; Matthew D Ritchey; Fleetwood Loustalot Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2022-06-16 Impact factor: 3.080
Authors: Eric K P Lee; Paul Poon; Benjamin H K Yip; Yacong Bo; Meng-Ting Zhu; Chun-Pong Yu; Alfonse C H Ngai; Martin C S Wong; Samuel Y S Wong Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2022-09-03 Impact factor: 6.106
Authors: Teng-Jen Chang; John F P Bridges; Mary Bynum; John W Jackson; Joshua J Joseph; Michael A Fischer; Bo Lu; Macarius M Donneyong Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 5.501