BACKGROUND: Although many studies have identified patient characteristics or chronic diseases associated with medication adherence, the clinical utility of such predictors has rarely been assessed. We attempted to develop clinical prediction rules for adherence with antihypertensive medications in 2 healthcare delivery systems. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed retrospective cohort studies of hypertension registries in an inner-city healthcare delivery system (n=17 176) and a health maintenance organization (n=94 297) in Denver, Colo. Adherence was defined by acquisition of 80% or more of antihypertensive medications. A multivariable model in the inner-city system found that adherent patients (36.3% of the total) were more likely than nonadherent patients to be older, white, married, and acculturated in US society, to have diabetes or cerebrovascular disease, not to abuse alcohol or controlled substances, and to be prescribed fewer than 3 antihypertensive medications. Although statistically significant, all multivariate odds ratios were 1.7 or less, and the model did not accurately discriminate adherent from nonadherent patients (C statistic=0.606). In the health maintenance organization, where 72.1% of patients were adherent, significant but weak associations existed between adherence and older age, white race, the lack of alcohol abuse, and fewer antihypertensive medications. The multivariate model again failed to accurately discriminate adherent from nonadherent individuals (C statistic=0.576). CONCLUSIONS: Although certain sociodemographic characteristics or clinical diagnoses are statistically associated with adherence to refills of antihypertensive medications, a combination of these characteristics is not sufficiently accurate to allow clinicians to predict whether their patients will be adherent with treatment.
BACKGROUND: Although many studies have identified patient characteristics or chronic diseases associated with medication adherence, the clinical utility of such predictors has rarely been assessed. We attempted to develop clinical prediction rules for adherence with antihypertensive medications in 2 healthcare delivery systems. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed retrospective cohort studies of hypertension registries in an inner-city healthcare delivery system (n=17 176) and a health maintenance organization (n=94 297) in Denver, Colo. Adherence was defined by acquisition of 80% or more of antihypertensive medications. A multivariable model in the inner-city system found that adherent patients (36.3% of the total) were more likely than nonadherent patients to be older, white, married, and acculturated in US society, to have diabetes or cerebrovascular disease, not to abuse alcohol or controlled substances, and to be prescribed fewer than 3 antihypertensive medications. Although statistically significant, all multivariate odds ratios were 1.7 or less, and the model did not accurately discriminate adherent from nonadherent patients (C statistic=0.606). In the health maintenance organization, where 72.1% of patients were adherent, significant but weak associations existed between adherence and older age, white race, the lack of alcohol abuse, and fewer antihypertensive medications. The multivariate model again failed to accurately discriminate adherent from nonadherent individuals (C statistic=0.576). CONCLUSIONS: Although certain sociodemographic characteristics or clinical diagnoses are statistically associated with adherence to refills of antihypertensive medications, a combination of these characteristics is not sufficiently accurate to allow clinicians to predict whether their patients will be adherent with treatment.
Authors: Rebecca Hanratty; Raymond O Estacio; L Miriam Dickinson; Vijayalaxmi Chandramouli; John F Steiner; Edward P Havranek Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2008-05
Authors: Ayse Akincigil; John R Bowblis; Carrie Levin; Saira Jan; Minalkumar Patel; Stephen Crystal Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-10-06 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Holly A Batal; Mori J Krantz; Rita A Dale; Phillip S Mehler; John F Steiner Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2007-10-25 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: James B Byrd; Chan Zeng; Heather M Tavel; David J Magid; Patrick J O'Connor; Karen L Margolis; Joe V Selby; P Michael Ho Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2011-07-18 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Jessica M Franklin; William H Shrank; Joyce Lii; Alexis K Krumme; Olga S Matlin; Troyen A Brennan; Niteesh K Choudhry Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Devin M Mann; Nicole L Glazer; Michael Winter; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Paul Muntner; Daichi Shimbo; William G Adams; Nancy R Kressin; Yuqing Zhang; Hyon Choi; Howard Cabral Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2013-02-20 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: D M van der Laan; P J M Elders; C C L M Boons; J J Beckeringh; G Nijpels; J G Hugtenburg Journal: J Hum Hypertens Date: 2017-06-29 Impact factor: 3.012
Authors: Sunil Kripalani; Kathryn Goggins; Sam Nwosu; Jonathan Schildcrout; Amanda S Mixon; Candace McNaughton; Amanda M McDougald Scott; Kenneth A Wallston Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2015