INTRODUCTION: In patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant or KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinomas, the prognostic impact of a concurrent PIK3CA mutation remains unclear. Although preclinical data suggest that sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibition (TKI) is decreased in EGFR-mutant lung cancers also harboring a PIK3CA mutation, this interaction has not been explored clinically. METHODS: Patients with lung adenocarcinomas harboring a PIK3CA mutation concurrent with a separate driver mutation were identified through mutational hotspot testing, multiplex sizing assays, and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Overall survival and outcomes with EGFR TKI monotherapy (EGFR-mutant) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared between double-mutant (EGFR-mutant or KRAS-mutant, concurrent PIK3CA-mutant) and single-mutant patients (EGFR-mutant or KRAS-mutant, PIK3CA wild-type) using log-rank tests. RESULTS: In EGFR-mutant and KRAS-mutant lung cancers, a concurrent PIK3CA mutation was associated with a decrease in median overall survival: 18 versus 33 months (EGFR double mutant, n = 10 versus single mutant, n = 43, p = 0.006), and 9 versus 16 months (KRAS double mutant, n = 16 versus single mutant, n = 47, p = 0.020). In EGFR-mutant lung cancers, a concurrent PIK3CA mutation did not impact benefit from EGFR TKI monotherapy. Single versus double mutant: objective response rate, 83% (n = 29) versus 62% (n = 6, p = 0.80); median time to progression, 11 (n = 29) versus 8 months (n = 6, p = 0.84); and median duration of TKI therapy, 15 (n = 32) versus 15 months (n = 10, p = 0.65). CONCLUSION: A concurrent PIK3CA mutation is a poor prognostic factor in patients with advanced EGFR-mutant or KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinomas. There was no evidence that clinical benefit from EGFR TKI monotherapy is affected by a concurrent PIK3CA mutation in EGFR-mutant lung cancers.
INTRODUCTION: In patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant or KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinomas, the prognostic impact of a concurrent PIK3CA mutation remains unclear. Although preclinical data suggest that sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibition (TKI) is decreased in EGFR-mutant lung cancers also harboring a PIK3CA mutation, this interaction has not been explored clinically. METHODS:Patients with lung adenocarcinomas harboring a PIK3CA mutation concurrent with a separate driver mutation were identified through mutational hotspot testing, multiplex sizing assays, and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Overall survival and outcomes with EGFR TKI monotherapy (EGFR-mutant) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared between double-mutant (EGFR-mutant or KRAS-mutant, concurrent PIK3CA-mutant) and single-mutant patients (EGFR-mutant or KRAS-mutant, PIK3CA wild-type) using log-rank tests. RESULTS: In EGFR-mutant and KRAS-mutant lung cancers, a concurrent PIK3CA mutation was associated with a decrease in median overall survival: 18 versus 33 months (EGFR double mutant, n = 10 versus single mutant, n = 43, p = 0.006), and 9 versus 16 months (KRAS double mutant, n = 16 versus single mutant, n = 47, p = 0.020). In EGFR-mutant lung cancers, a concurrent PIK3CA mutation did not impact benefit from EGFR TKI monotherapy. Single versus double mutant: objective response rate, 83% (n = 29) versus 62% (n = 6, p = 0.80); median time to progression, 11 (n = 29) versus 8 months (n = 6, p = 0.84); and median duration of TKI therapy, 15 (n = 32) versus 15 months (n = 10, p = 0.65). CONCLUSION: A concurrent PIK3CA mutation is a poor prognostic factor in patients with advanced EGFR-mutant or KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinomas. There was no evidence that clinical benefit from EGFR TKI monotherapy is affected by a concurrent PIK3CA mutation in EGFR-mutant lung cancers.
Authors: Surbhi Gupta; Antoine R Ramjaun; Paula Haiko; Yihua Wang; Patricia H Warne; Barbara Nicke; Emma Nye; Gordon Stamp; Kari Alitalo; Julian Downward Journal: Cell Date: 2007-06-01 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Jamie E Chaft; Maria E Arcila; Paul K Paik; Christopher Lau; Gregory J Riely; M Catherine Pietanza; Maureen F Zakowski; Valerie Rusch; Camelia S Sima; Marc Ladanyi; Mark G Kris Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2011-12-01 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Jeffrey A Engelman; Pasi A Jänne; Craig Mermel; Joseph Pearlberg; Toru Mukohara; Christina Fleet; Karen Cichowski; Bruce E Johnson; Lewis C Cantley Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-02-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jeffrey A Engelman; Toru Mukohara; Kreshnik Zejnullahu; Eugene Lifshits; Ana M Borrás; Christopher-Michael Gale; George N Naumov; Beow Y Yeap; Emily Jarrell; Jason Sun; Sean Tracy; Xiaojun Zhao; John V Heymach; Bruce E Johnson; Lewis C Cantley; Pasi A Jänne Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2006-08-10 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Lecia V Sequist; Belinda A Waltman; Dora Dias-Santagata; Subba Digumarthy; Alexa B Turke; Panos Fidias; Kristin Bergethon; Alice T Shaw; Scott Gettinger; Arjola K Cosper; Sara Akhavanfard; Rebecca S Heist; Jennifer Temel; James G Christensen; John C Wain; Thomas J Lynch; Kathy Vernovsky; Eugene J Mark; Michael Lanuti; A John Iafrate; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Jeffrey A Engelman Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2011-03-23 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Helena A Yu; Maria E Arcila; Natasha Rekhtman; Camelia S Sima; Maureen F Zakowski; William Pao; Mark G Kris; Vincent A Miller; Marc Ladanyi; Gregory J Riely Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jeffrey A Engelman; Liang Chen; Xiaohong Tan; Katherine Crosby; Alexander R Guimaraes; Rabi Upadhyay; Michel Maira; Kate McNamara; Samanthi A Perera; Youngchul Song; Lucian R Chirieac; Ramneet Kaur; Angela Lightbown; Jessica Simendinger; Timothy Li; Robert F Padera; Carlos García-Echeverría; Ralph Weissleder; Umar Mahmood; Lewis C Cantley; Kwok-Kin Wong Journal: Nat Med Date: 2008-11-30 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Emmet J Jordan; Hyunjae R Kim; Maria E Arcila; David Barron; Debyani Chakravarty; JianJiong Gao; Matthew T Chang; Andy Ni; Ritika Kundra; Philip Jonsson; Gowtham Jayakumaran; Sizhi Paul Gao; Hannah C Johnsen; Aphrothiti J Hanrahan; Ahmet Zehir; Natasha Rekhtman; Michelle S Ginsberg; Bob T Li; Helena A Yu; Paul K Paik; Alexander Drilon; Matthew D Hellmann; Dalicia N Reales; Ryma Benayed; Valerie W Rusch; Mark G Kris; Jamie E Chaft; José Baselga; Barry S Taylor; Nikolaus Schultz; Charles M Rudin; David M Hyman; Michael F Berger; David B Solit; Marc Ladanyi; Gregory J Riely Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2017-03-23 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Ying Jin; Hua Bao; Xiuning Le; Xiaojun Fan; Ming Tang; Xun Shi; Jun Zhao; Junrong Yan; Yang Xu; Kelly Quek; Yasir Y Elamin; Jianhua Zhang; P Andrew Futreal; Ignacio I Wistuba; John V Heymach; Guangyuan Lou; Lan Shao; Qiong He; Chen Lin; Xue Wu; Yang W Shao; Xiaonan Wang; Jiachen He; Yamei Chen; Justin Stebbing; Ming Chen; Jianjun Zhang; Xinmin Yu Journal: Oncogene Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Xiuning Le; Sonam Puri; Marcelo V Negrao; Monique B Nilsson; Jacqulyne Robichaux; Theresa Boyle; J Kevin Hicks; Katherine L Lovinger; Emily Roarty; Waree Rinsurongkawong; Ming Tang; Huiying Sun; Yasir Elamin; Lara C Lacerda; Jeff Lewis; Jack A Roth; Stephen G Swisher; J Jack Lee; William N William; Bonnie S Glisson; Jianjun Zhang; Vassiliki A Papadimitrakopoulou; Jhanelle E Gray; John V Heymach Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-09-18 Impact factor: 12.531