Literature DB >> 26333927

Bumblebee flight performance in cluttered environments: effects of obstacle orientation, body size and acceleration.

James D Crall1, Sridhar Ravi2, Andrew M Mountcastle3, Stacey A Combes3.   

Abstract

Locomotion through structurally complex environments is fundamental to the life history of most flying animals, and the costs associated with movement through clutter have important consequences for the ecology and evolution of volant taxa. However, few studies have directly investigated how flying animals navigate through cluttered environments, or examined which aspects of flight performance are most critical for this challenging task. Here, we examined how body size, acceleration and obstacle orientation affect the flight of bumblebees in an artificial, cluttered environment. Non-steady flight performance is often predicted to decrease with body size, as a result of a presumed reduction in acceleration capacity, but few empirical tests of this hypothesis have been performed in flying animals. We found that increased body size is associated with impaired flight performance (specifically transit time) in cluttered environments, but not with decreased peak accelerations. In addition, previous studies have shown that flying insects can produce higher accelerations along the lateral body axis, suggesting that if maneuvering is constrained by acceleration capacity, insects should perform better when maneuvering around objects laterally rather than vertically. Our data show that bumblebees do generate higher accelerations in the lateral direction, but we found no difference in their ability to pass through obstacle courses requiring lateral versus vertical maneuvering. In sum, our results suggest that acceleration capacity is not a primary determinant of flight performance in clutter, as is often assumed. Rather than being driven by the scaling of acceleration, we show that the reduced flight performance of larger bees in cluttered environments is driven by the allometry of both path sinuosity and mean flight speed. Specifically, differences in collision-avoidance behavior underlie much of the variation in flight performance across body size, with larger bees negotiating obstacles more cautiously. Thus, our results show that cluttered environments challenge the flight capacity of insects, but in surprising ways that emphasize the importance of behavioral and ecological context for understanding flight performance in complex environments.
© 2015. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bombus impatiens; Clutter; Collision avoidance; Environmental complexity; Insect flight; Locomotion

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26333927     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.121293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  17 in total

1.  Nectar vs. pollen loading affects the tradeoff between flight stability and maneuverability in bumblebees.

Authors:  Andrew M Mountcastle; Sridhar Ravi; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Into rude air: hummingbird flight performance in variable aerial environments.

Authors:  V M Ortega-Jimenez; M Badger; H Wang; R Dudley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Wing wear reduces bumblebee flight performance in a dynamic obstacle course.

Authors:  Andrew M Mountcastle; Teressa M Alexander; Callin M Switzer; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Overlap of Ecological Niche Breadth of Euglossa cordata and Eulaema nigrita (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Euglossini) Accessed by Pollen Loads and Species Distribution Modeling.

Authors:  Elder Assis Miranda; Irailde do Nascimento Lima; Cíntia A Oi; Margarita M López-Uribe; Marco Antonio Del Lama; Breno Magalhães Freitas; Cláudia Inês Silva
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 1.434

5.  Foraging in an unsteady world: bumblebee flight performance in field-realistic turbulence.

Authors:  J D Crall; J J Chang; R L Oppenheimer; S A Combes
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

6.  Bumblebees display characteristics of active vision during robust obstacle avoidance flight.

Authors:  Sridhar Ravi; Tim Siesenop; Olivier J Bertrand; Liang Li; Charlotte Doussot; Alex Fisher; William H Warren; Martin Egelhaaf
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Allometry of wing twist and camber in a flower chafer during free flight: How do wing deformations scale with body size?

Authors:  Yonatan Meresman; Gal Ribak
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Obstacle traversal and route choice in flying honeybees: Evidence for individual handedness.

Authors:  Marielle Ong; Michael Bulmer; Julia Groening; Mandyam V Srinivasan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Transition by head-on collision: mechanically mediated manoeuvres in cockroaches and small robots.

Authors:  Kaushik Jayaram; Jean-Michel Mongeau; Anand Mohapatra; Paul Birkmeyer; Ronald S Fearing; Robert J Full
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  The Dominant Role of Visual Motion Cues in Bumblebee Flight Control Revealed Through Virtual Reality.

Authors:  Elisa Frasnelli; Natalie Hempel de Ibarra; Finlay J Stewart
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.