Literature DB >> 26333102

Radiation Induced DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Radiology.

M A Kuefner1, M Brand2, C Engert2, S A Schwab3, M Uder2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Shortly after the discovery of X-rays, their damaging effect on biological tissues was observed. The determination of radiation exposure in diagnostic and interventional radiology is usually based on physical measurements or mathematical algorithms with standardized dose simulations. γ-H2AX immunofluorescence microscopy is a reliable and sensitive method for the quantification of radiation induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) in blood lymphocytes. The detectable amount of these DNA damages correlates well with the dose received. However, the biological radiation damage depends not only on dose but also on other individual factors like radiation sensitivity and DNA repair capacity. Iodinated contrast agents can enhance the x-ray induced DNA damage level. After their induction DSB are quickly repaired. A protective effect of antioxidants has been postulated in experimental studies. This review explains the prinicple of the γ-H2AX technique and provides an overview on studies evaluating DSB in radiologic examinations. KEY POINTS: Radiologic examinations including CT and angiography induce DNA double-strand breaks. Even after mammography a slight but significant increase is detectable in peripheral blood lymphocytes. The number of radiation induced double-strand breaks correlates well with the radiation dose. Individual factors including radiation sensitivity, DNA repair capacity and the application of iodinated contrast media has an influence on the DNA damage level. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26333102     DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1553209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  17 in total

1.  Female Mice are More Resistant to the Mixed-Field (67% Neutron + 33% Gamma) Radiation-Induced Injury in Bone Marrow and Small Intestine than Male Mice due to Sustained Increases in G-CSF and the Bcl-2/Bax Ratio and Lower miR-34a and MAPK Activation.

Authors:  Juliann G Kiang; Georgetta Cannon; Matthew G Olson; Joan T Smith; Marsha N Anderson; Min Zhai; M Victoria Umali; Kevin Ho; Connie Ho; Wanchang Cui; Mang Xiao
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.372

Review 2.  Is MRI imaging in pediatric age totally safe? A critical reprisal.

Authors:  Sergio Salerno; Claudio Granata; Marco Trapenese; Vittorio Cannata; Davide Curione; Maria Camilla Rossi Espagnet; Andrea Magistrelli; Paolo Tomà
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 3.  Medicinal Thiols: Current Status and New Perspectives.

Authors:  Annalise R Pfaff; Justin Beltz; Emily King; Nuran Ercal
Journal:  Mini Rev Med Chem       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 3.862

Review 4.  All for one, though not one for all: team players in normal tissue radiobiology.

Authors:  Marjan Boerma; Catherine M Davis; Isabel L Jackson; Dörthe Schaue; Jacqueline P Williams
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.694

5.  Persistent DNA Double-Strand Breaks After Repeated Diagnostic CT Scans in Breast Epithelial Cells and Lymphocytes.

Authors:  Natalia V Bogdanova; Nina Jguburia; Dhanya Ramachandran; Nora Nischik; Katharina Stemwedel; Georg Stamm; Thomas Werncke; Frank Wacker; Thilo Dörk; Hans Christiansen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Rapamycin-induced autophagy sensitizes A549 cells to radiation associated with DNA damage repair inhibition.

Authors:  Yong Li; Fen Liu; Yong Wang; Donghai Li; Fei Guo; Liyao Xu; Zhengguo Zeng; Xiaojun Zhong; Kejian Qian
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Gadolinium-enhanced cardiac MR exams of human subjects are associated with significant increases in the DNA repair marker 53BP1, but not the damage marker γH2AX.

Authors:  Jennifer S McDonald; Robert J McDonald; Jacob B Ekins; Anthony S Tin; Sylvain Costes; Tamara M Hudson; Dana J Schroeder; Kevin Kallmes; Scott H Kaufmann; Philip M Young; Aiming Lu; Ramanathan Kadirvel; David F Kallmes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Radioprotective agents to prevent cellular damage due to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Tyler A Smith; Daniel R Kirkpatrick; Sean Smith; Trevor K Smith; Tate Pearson; Aparna Kailasam; Kortney Z Herrmann; Johanna Schubert; Devendra K Agrawal
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 5.531

9.  Evaluating Gamma-H2AX Expression as a Biomarker of DNA Damage after X-ray in Angiography Patients.

Authors:  A Alipoor; R Fardid; S Sharifzadeh
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2018-12-01

Review 10.  Risks of Using Sterilization by Gamma Radiation: The Other Side of the Coin.

Authors:  C Randall Harrell; Valentin Djonov; Crissy Fellabaum; Vladislav Volarevic
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.