Literature DB >> 26331849

Limitations of toxicity characterization in life cycle assessment: Can adverse outcome pathways provide a new foundation?

Kurt A Gust1, Zachary A Collier1, Michael L Mayo1, Jacob K Stanley1, Ping Gong1, Mark A Chappell1.   

Abstract

Life cycle assessment (LCA) has considerable merit for holistic evaluation of product planning, development, production, and disposal, with the inherent benefit of providing a forecast of potential health and environmental impacts. However, a technical review of current life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) methods revealed limitations within the biological effects assessment protocols, including: simplistic assessment approaches and models; an inability to integrate emerging types of toxicity data; a reliance on linear impact assessment models; a lack of methods to mitigate uncertainty; and no explicit consideration of effects in species of concern. The purpose of the current study is to demonstrate that a new concept in toxicological and regulatory assessment, the adverse outcome pathway (AOP), has many useful attributes of potential use to ameliorate many of these problems, to expand data utility and model robustness, and to enable more accurate and defensible biological effects assessments within LCIA. Background, context, and examples have been provided to demonstrate these potential benefits. We additionally propose that these benefits can be most effectively realized through development of quantitative AOPs (qAOPs) crafted to meet the needs of the LCIA framework. As a means to stimulate qAOP research and development in support of LCIA, we propose 3 conceptual classes of qAOP, each with unique inherent attributes for supporting LCIA: 1) mechanistic, including computational toxicology models; 2) probabilistic, including Bayesian networks and supervised machine learning models; and 3) weight of evidence, including models built using decision-analytic methods. Overall, we have highlighted a number of potential applications of qAOPs that can refine and add value to LCIA. As the AOP concept and support framework matures, we see the potential for qAOPs to serve a foundational role for next-generation effects characterization within LCIA. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2016;12:580-590. Published 2015. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Published 2015. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Characterization factor; Life cycle assessment; Quantitative adverse outcome pathway; Toxicity assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26331849     DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag        ISSN: 1551-3777            Impact factor:   2.992


  4 in total

1.  Recycling, reuse, and circular economy: a challenge for ecotoxicological research.

Authors:  Vera I Slaveykova; Patrice Couture; Sabine Duquesne; Patrick D'Hugues; Wilfried Sánchez
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-05-19       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  A framework for predicting impacts on ecosystem services from (sub)organismal responses to chemicals.

Authors:  Valery E Forbes; Chris J Salice; Bjorn Birnir; Randy J F Bruins; Peter Calow; Virginie Ducrot; Nika Galic; Kristina Garber; Bret C Harvey; Henriette Jager; Andrew Kanarek; Robert Pastorok; Steve F Railsback; Richard Rebarber; Pernille Thorbek
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  The Adverse Outcome Pathway: A Multifaceted Framework Supporting 21st Century Toxicology.

Authors:  Gerald T Ankley; Stephen W Edwards
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2018-06-01

Review 4.  Quantitative adverse outcome pathway (qAOP) models for toxicity prediction.

Authors:  Nicoleta Spinu; Mark T D Cronin; Steven J Enoch; Judith C Madden; Andrew P Worth
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 5.153

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.