Literature DB >> 26331248

Migration in Confined 3D Environments Is Determined by a Combination of Adhesiveness, Nuclear Volume, Contractility, and Cell Stiffness.

Lena A Lautscham1, Christoph Kämmerer2, Janina R Lange2, Thorsten Kolb2, Christoph Mark2, Achim Schilling2, Pamela L Strissel3, Reiner Strick3, Caroline Gluth2, Amy C Rowat4, Claus Metzner2, Ben Fabry2.   

Abstract

In cancer metastasis and other physiological processes, cells migrate through the three-dimensional (3D) extracellular matrix of connective tissue and must overcome the steric hindrance posed by pores that are smaller than the cells. It is currently assumed that low cell stiffness promotes cell migration through confined spaces, but other factors such as adhesion and traction forces may be equally important. To study 3D migration under confinement in a stiff (1.77 MPa) environment, we use soft lithography to fabricate polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) devices consisting of linear channel segments with 20 μm length, 3.7 μm height, and a decreasing width from 11.2 to 1.7 μm. To study 3D migration in a soft (550 Pa) environment, we use self-assembled collagen networks with an average pore size of 3 μm. We then measure the ability of four different cancer cell lines to migrate through these 3D matrices, and correlate the results with cell physical properties including contractility, adhesiveness, cell stiffness, and nuclear volume. Furthermore, we alter cell adhesion by coating the channel walls with different amounts of adhesion proteins, and we increase cell stiffness by overexpression of the nuclear envelope protein lamin A. Although all cell lines are able to migrate through the smallest 1.7 μm channels, we find significant differences in the migration velocity. Cell migration is impeded in cell lines with larger nuclei, lower adhesiveness, and to a lesser degree also in cells with lower contractility and higher stiffness. Our data show that the ability to overcome the steric hindrance of the matrix cannot be attributed to a single cell property but instead arises from a combination of adhesiveness, nuclear volume, contractility, and cell stiffness.
Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26331248      PMCID: PMC4564685          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.07.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  49 in total

1.  Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model.

Authors:  N Wang; K Naruse; D Stamenović; J J Fredberg; S M Mijailovich; I M Tolić-Nørrelykke; T Polte; R Mannix; D E Ingber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Assembly and mechanosensory function of focal contacts.

Authors:  B Geiger; A Bershadsky
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 3.  Extracellular matrix determinants of proteolytic and non-proteolytic cell migration.

Authors:  Katarina Wolf; Peter Friedl
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 20.808

4.  Nuclear lamin-A scales with tissue stiffness and enhances matrix-directed differentiation.

Authors:  Joe Swift; Irena L Ivanovska; Amnon Buxboim; Takamasa Harada; P C Dave P Dingal; Joel Pinter; J David Pajerowski; Kyle R Spinler; Jae-Won Shin; Manorama Tewari; Florian Rehfeldt; David W Speicher; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Pushing off the walls: a mechanism of cell motility in confinement.

Authors:  R J Hawkins; M Piel; G Faure-Andre; A M Lennon-Dumenil; J F Joanny; J Prost; R Voituriez
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.

Authors:  U K Laemmli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The covalent attachment of adhesion molecules to silicone membranes for cell stretching applications.

Authors:  Pierre-Jean Wipff; Hicham Majd; Chitrangada Acharya; Lara Buscemi; Jean-Jacques Meister; Boris Hinz
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-12-27       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients.

Authors:  Sarah E Cross; Yu-Sheng Jin; Jianyu Rao; James K Gimzewski
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2007-12-02       Impact factor: 39.213

9.  Impact of tumor cell cytoskeleton organization on invasiveness and migration: a microchannel-based approach.

Authors:  Claudio G Rolli; Thomas Seufferlein; Ralf Kemkemer; Joachim P Spatz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Breakdown of the endothelial barrier function in tumor cell transmigration.

Authors:  Claudia Tanja Mierke; Daniel Paranhos Zitterbart; Philip Kollmannsberger; Carina Raupach; Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt; Tamme Weyert Goecke; Jürgen Behrens; Ben Fabry
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 4.033

View more
  61 in total

1.  Three-dimensional force microscopy of cells in biopolymer networks.

Authors:  Julian Steinwachs; Claus Metzner; Kai Skodzek; Nadine Lang; Ingo Thievessen; Christoph Mark; Stefan Münster; Katerina E Aifantis; Ben Fabry
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Nuclear Membrane-Targeted Gold Nanoparticles Inhibit Cancer Cell Migration and Invasion.

Authors:  Moustafa R K Ali; Yue Wu; Deepraj Ghosh; Brian H Do; Kuangcai Chen; Michelle R Dawson; Ning Fang; Todd A Sulchek; Mostafa A El-Sayed
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 3.  Recent advances in understanding nuclear size and shape.

Authors:  Richik N Mukherjee; Pan Chen; Daniel L Levy
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 4.197

4.  Cell-substrate mechanics guide collective cell migration through intercellular adhesion: a dynamic finite element cellular model.

Authors:  Jieling Zhao; Farid Manuchehrfar; Jie Liang
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2020-02-27

5.  Eukaryotic Cell Dynamics from Crawlers to Swimmers.

Authors:  H G Othmer
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci       Date:  2018-07-19

6.  Extent of Cell Confinement in Microtracks Affects Speed and Results in Differential Matrix Strains.

Authors:  Jenna A Mosier; Aniqua Rahman-Zaman; Matthew R Zanotelli; Jacob A VanderBurgh; Francois Bordeleau; Brenton D Hoffman; Cynthia A Reinhart-King
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 7.  Multiple mechanisms of 3D migration: the origins of plasticity.

Authors:  Ryan J Petrie; Kenneth M Yamada
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 8.  The Mechanics of Single Cell and Collective Migration of Tumor Cells.

Authors:  Marianne Lintz; Adam Muñoz; Cynthia A Reinhart-King
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 9.  Squish and squeeze-the nucleus as a physical barrier during migration in confined environments.

Authors:  Alexandra Lynn McGregor; Chieh-Ren Hsia; Jan Lammerding
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 8.382

10.  Stiffness of pancreatic cancer cells is associated with increased invasive potential.

Authors:  Angelyn V Nguyen; Kendra D Nyberg; Michael B Scott; Alia M Welsh; Andrew H Nguyen; Nanping Wu; Sophia V Hohlbauch; Nicholas A Geisse; Ewan A Gibb; A Gordon Robertson; Timothy R Donahue; Amy C Rowat
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 2.192

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.