Literature DB >> 26330746

Identifying Engineering, Clinical and Patient's Metrics for Evaluating and Quantifying Performance of Brain-Machine Interface (BMI) Systems.

Jose L Contreras-Vidal1.   

Abstract

Brain-machine interface (BMI) devices have unparalleled potential to restore functional movement capabilities to stroke, paralyzed and amputee patients. Although BMI systems have achieved success in a handful of investigative studies, translation of closed-loop neuroprosthetic devices from the laboratory to the market is challenged by gaps in the scientific data regarding long-term device reliability and safety, uncertainty in the regulatory, market and reimbursement pathways, lack of metrics for evaluating and quantifying performance in BMI systems, as well as patient-acceptance challenges that impede their fast and effective translation to the end user. This review focuses on the identification of engineering, clinical and user's BMI metrics for new and existing BMI applications.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 26330746      PMCID: PMC4553245          DOI: 10.1109/SMC.2014.6974126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Int Conf Syst Man Cybern        ISSN: 1062-922X


  19 in total

Review 1.  Brain-computer interfaces in medicine.

Authors:  Jerry J Shih; Dean J Krusienski; Jonathan R Wolpaw
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 2.  Transfer of information by BMI.

Authors:  E J Tehovnik; L C Woods; W M Slocum
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  High accuracy decoding of user intentions using EEG to control a lower-body exoskeleton.

Authors:  Atilla Kilicarslan; Saurabh Prasad; Robert G Grossman; Jose L Contreras-Vidal
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2013

5.  A clinical roadmap for brain--neural machine interfaces: trainees' perspectives on the 2013 International Workshop.

Authors:  Sook-Lei Liew; Harshavardhan Agashe; Nikunj Bhagat; Andrew Paek; Thomas C Bulea
Journal:  IEEE Pulse       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.924

6.  A general method for assessing brain-computer interface performance and its limitations.

Authors:  N Jeremy Hill; Ann-Katrin Häuser; Gerwin Schalk
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 7.  Creating new functional circuits for action via brain-machine interfaces.

Authors:  Amy L Orsborn; Jose M Carmena
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Emergence of a stable cortical map for neuroprosthetic control.

Authors:  Karunesh Ganguly; Jose M Carmena
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Extracting kinematic parameters for monkey bipedal walking from cortical neuronal ensemble activity.

Authors:  Nathan A Fitzsimmons; Mikhail A Lebedev; Ian D Peikon; Miguel A L Nicolelis
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-09

10.  Evaluating true BCI communication rate through mutual information and language models.

Authors:  William Speier; Corey Arnold; Nader Pouratian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Gait adaptation to visual kinematic perturbations using a real-time closed-loop brain-computer interface to a virtual reality avatar.

Authors:  Trieu Phat Luu; Yongtian He; Samuel Brown; Sho Nakagame; Jose L Contreras-Vidal
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  A convolutional neural network for steady state visual evoked potential classification under ambulatory environment.

Authors:  No-Sang Kwak; Klaus-Robert Müller; Seong-Whan Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.