Literature DB >> 26328939

Comparison of investigator-delineated gross tumor volumes and quality assurance in pancreatic cancer: Analysis of the pretrial benchmark case for the SCALOP trial.

Emmanouil Fokas1, Charlotte Clifford2, Emiliano Spezi3, George Joseph4, Jennifer Branagan5, Chris Hurt6, Lisette Nixon6, Ross Abrams7, John Staffurth8, Somnath Mukherjee9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To evaluate the variation in investigator-delineated volumes and assess plans from the radiotherapy trial quality assurance (RTTQA) program of SCALOP, a phase II trial in locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participating investigators (n=25) outlined a pre-trial benchmark case as per RT protocol, and the accuracy of investigators' GTV (iGTV) and PTV (iPTV) was evaluated, against the trials team-defined gold standard GTV (gsGTV) and PTV (gsPTV), using both qualitative and geometric analyses. The median Jaccard Conformity Index (JCI) and Geographical Miss Index (GMI) were calculated. Participating RT centers also submitted a radiotherapy plan for this benchmark case, which was centrally reviewed against protocol-defined constraints.
RESULTS: Twenty-five investigator-defined contours were evaluated. The median JCI and GMI of iGTVs were 0.57 (IQR: 0.51-0.65) and 0.26 (IQR: 0.15-0.40). For iPTVs, these were 0.75 (IQR: 0.71-0.79) and 0.14 (IQR: 0.11-0.22) respectively. Qualitative analysis showed largest variation at the tumor edges and failure to recognize a peri-pancreatic lymph node. There were no major protocol deviations in RT planning, but three minor PTV coverage deviations were identified. .
CONCLUSIONS: SCALOP demonstrated considerable variation in iGTV delineation. RTTQA workshops and real-time central review of delineations are needed in future trials.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conformity index; Pancreas; Quality assurance; Radiotherapy; gsGTV; iGTV

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26328939     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.08.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  9 in total

1.  Phase I trial of vorinostat added to chemoradiation with capecitabine in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Emily Chan; Lori R Arlinghaus; Dana B Cardin; Laura Goff; Jordan D Berlin; Alexander Parikh; Richard G Abramson; Thomas E Yankeelov; Scott Hiebert; Nipun Merchant; Srividya Bhaskara; Anuradha Bapsi Chakravarthy
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Individually optimized contrast-enhanced 4D-CT for radiotherapy simulation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Wookjin Choi; Ming Xue; Barton F Lane; Min Kyu Kang; Kruti Patel; William F Regine; Paul Klahr; Jiahui Wang; Shifeng Chen; Warren D'Souza; Wei Lu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Metrics to evaluate the performance of auto-segmentation for radiation treatment planning: A critical review.

Authors:  Michael V Sherer; Diana Lin; Sharif Elguindi; Simon Duke; Li-Tee Tan; Jon Cacicedo; Max Dahele; Erin F Gillespie
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 6.901

4.  Comparison of investigator-delineated gross tumour volumes and quality assurance in pancreatic cancer: Analysis of the on-trial cases for the SCALOP trial.

Authors:  Emmanouil Fokas; Emiliano Spezi; Neel Patel; Chris Hurt; Lisette Nixon; Kwun-Ye Chu; John Staffurth; Ross Abrams; Somnath Mukherjee
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Quality assurance of the PREOPANC trial (2012-003181-40) for preoperative radiochemotherapy in pancreatic cancer : The dummy run.

Authors:  Eva Versteijne; Eelco Lens; Astrid van der Horst; Arjan Bel; Jorrit Visser; Cornelis J A Punt; Mustafa Suker; Casper H J van Eijck; Geertjan van Tienhoven
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Long-term results and recurrence patterns from SCALOP: a phase II randomised trial of gemcitabine- or capecitabine-based chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  C N Hurt; S Falk; T Crosby; A McDonald; R Ray; G Joseph; J Staffurth; R A Abrams; G Griffiths; T Maughan; S Mukherjee
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Modelling duodenum radiotherapy toxicity using cohort dose-volume-histogram data.

Authors:  Daniel L P Holyoake; Marianne Aznar; Somnath Mukherjee; Mike Partridge; Maria A Hawkins
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Considerable interobserver variation in delineation of pancreatic cancer on 3DCT and 4DCT: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Eva Versteijne; Oliver J Gurney-Champion; Astrid van der Horst; Eelco Lens; M Willemijn Kolff; Jeroen Buijsen; Gati Ebrahimi; Karen J Neelis; Coen R N Rasch; Jaap Stoker; Marcel van Herk; Arjan Bel; Geertjan van Tienhoven
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Conformity analysis to demonstrate reproducibility of target volumes for Margin-Intense Stereotactic Radiotherapy for borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Daniel L P Holyoake; Maxwell Robinson; Derek Grose; David McIntosh; David Sebag-Montefiore; Ganesh Radhakrishna; Neel Patel; Mike Partridge; Somnath Mukherjee; Maria A Hawkins
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 6.280

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.