Hye Sun Park1, So Yeon Kim2, Seung-Mo Hong3, Seong Ho Park1, Seung Soo Lee1, Jae Ho Byun1, Jin Hee Kim1, Hyoung Jung Kim1, Moon-Gyu Lee1. 1. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, Korea. 2. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, Korea. sykimrad@amc.seoul.kr. 3. Department of Pathology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe imaging findings of arterial hypervascular solid-appearing serous cystic neoplasms (SCNs) of the pancreas on CT and MR and determine imaging features differentiating them from neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 15 arterial hypervascular solid-appearing SCNs and randomly chose 30 size-matched pancreatic NETs. On CT, two radiologists in consensus assessed the size, morphology, and CT attenuation. On MR, predominant signal intensity and the amount of the cystic component on T2-weighted images and ADC maps were evaluated and compared using Fisher's exact and Student's t-test. RESULTS: The mean SCN size was 2.6 cm (range, 0.8-8.3). The CT findings were similar between the two tumours: location, shape, margin, and enhancement pattern. SCNs were significantly more hypodense on non-enhanced CT images than NETs (P = .03). They differed significantly on MR: bright signal intensity (P = .01) and more than a 10% cystic component on T2-weighted images (P = .01) were more common in SCNs than in NETs. All SCNs showed a non-restrictive pattern on the ADC map, while NETs showed diffusion restriction (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Arterial hypervascular solid-appearing SCNs and NETs share similar imaging features. Non-enhanced CT and MR images with T2-weighted images and ADC maps can facilitate the differentiation. KEY POINTS: • Frequency of hypervascular solid-appearing SCNs was 7.3% among surgically confirmed SCNs. • Hypervascular solid-appearing SCN of the pancreas can mimic pancreatic NETs. • Unenhanced CT and MR features help to differentiate the two tumours.
PURPOSE: To describe imaging findings of arterial hypervascular solid-appearing serous cystic neoplasms (SCNs) of the pancreas on CT and MR and determine imaging features differentiating them from neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 15 arterial hypervascular solid-appearing SCNs and randomly chose 30 size-matched pancreatic NETs. On CT, two radiologists in consensus assessed the size, morphology, and CT attenuation. On MR, predominant signal intensity and the amount of the cystic component on T2-weighted images and ADC maps were evaluated and compared using Fisher's exact and Student's t-test. RESULTS: The mean SCN size was 2.6 cm (range, 0.8-8.3). The CT findings were similar between the two tumours: location, shape, margin, and enhancement pattern. SCNs were significantly more hypodense on non-enhanced CT images than NETs (P = .03). They differed significantly on MR: bright signal intensity (P = .01) and more than a 10% cystic component on T2-weighted images (P = .01) were more common in SCNs than in NETs. All SCNs showed a non-restrictive pattern on the ADC map, while NETs showed diffusion restriction (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Arterial hypervascular solid-appearing SCNs and NETs share similar imaging features. Non-enhanced CT and MR images with T2-weighted images and ADC maps can facilitate the differentiation. KEY POINTS: • Frequency of hypervascular solid-appearing SCNs was 7.3% among surgically confirmed SCNs. • Hypervascular solid-appearing SCN of the pancreas can mimic pancreatic NETs. • Unenhanced CT and MR features help to differentiate the two tumours.
Authors: Madhusudhan R Sanaka; Thomas E Kowalski; Corey Brotz; Charles J Yeo; Peter McCue; Juan Palazzo Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2007-03-28 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Satomi Kawamoto; Pamela T Johnson; Chanjuan Shi; Aatur D Singhi; Ralph H Hruban; Christopher L Wolfgang; Barish H Edil; Elliot K Fishman Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Hye Young Sun; Se Hyung Kim; Min A Kim; Jae Young Lee; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2010-01-06 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Nicole A Belsley; Martha B Pitman; Gregory Y Lauwers; William R Brugge; Vikram Deshpande Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-04-25 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: James R Howe; Nipun B Merchant; Claudius Conrad; Xavier M Keutgen; Julie Hallet; Jeffrey A Drebin; Rebecca M Minter; Terry C Lairmore; Jennifer F Tseng; Herbert J Zeh; Steven K Libutti; Gagandeep Singh; Jeffrey E Lee; Thomas A Hope; Michelle K Kim; Yusuf Menda; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Jennifer A Chan; Rodney F Pommier Journal: Pancreas Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 3.327