| Literature DB >> 26328917 |
Rui Liao1, Zhuo-Wei Tang2, De-Wei Li3, Shi-Qiao Luo4, Ping Huang5, Cheng-You Du6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been identified as a predictor for the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the cut-off of NLR is inconsistent in various studies. Thus, we detected the prognostic value of preoperative NLR in the single-nodule small HCC (SHCC) patients using X-tile for cutpoint.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26328917 PMCID: PMC4557750 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-015-0670-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Surg Oncol ISSN: 1477-7819 Impact factor: 2.754
Characteristics of patients according to NLR
| Characteristics | NLR |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| ≤2.1 ( | |||
| Gender (male vs female) | 111 vs 19 | 78 vs 14 | NS |
| Age | 52.0 ± 11.3 | 55.1 ± 10.0 | 0.049 |
| Albumin (g/L) | 41.81 ± 5.13 | 42.13 ± 4.77 | NS |
| ALT (U/L) | 59.88 ± 82.22 | 64.65 ± 110.44 | NS |
| AST (U/L) | 39.25 ± 20.63 | 54.99 ± 83.46 | NS |
| TB (mg/dL) | 0.84 ± 0.34 | 1.16 ± 1.08 | 0.012 |
| Cr (mg/dL) | 0.87 ± 0.17 | 0.98 ± 0.78 | NS |
| Lymphocyte counts (109/L) | 1.80 ± 0.66 | 1.20 ± 0.50 | <0.001 |
| Neutrophil counts (109/L) | 2.59 ± 0.83 | 4.70 ± 2.61 | <0.001 |
| WBC counts (109/L) | 4.90 ± 1.45 | 6.49 ± 2.79 | <0.001 |
| HBsAg (positive vs negative) | 118 vs 12 | 72 vs 20 | 0.011 |
| Anti-HCV (positive vs negative) | 1 vs 129 | 0 vs 92 | NS |
| AFP (ng/mL) (≤20 vs >20) | 51 vs 79 | 40 vs 52 | NS |
| INR | 1.02 ± 0.077 | 1.03 ± 0.09 | NS |
| Platelet counts (109/L) | 137.36 ± 57.08 | 134.16 ± 62.42 | NS |
| Vascular invasion (yes vs no) | 25 vs 105 | 24 vs 68 | NS |
| Tumor differentiation (I–II vs III–IV) | 94 vs 36 | 73 vs 19 | NS |
| Tumor encapsulation (yes vs no) | 50 vs 80 | 45 vs 47 | NS |
| Tumor size (≤3.0 vs >3.0) | 74 vs 56 | 40 vs 52 | NS |
| TNM stage (I–II vs IIIA) | 108 vs 22 | 70 vs 22 | NS |
| Postoperative TACE (yes vs no) | 37 vs 93 | 32 vs 60 | NS |
| Re-operation (yes vs no) | 10 vs 120 | 6 vs 86 | NS |
NLR neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, TB total bilirubin, Cr creatinine, WBC white blood cell, HBsAg hepatitis B surface antigen, AFP alpha-fetoprotein, INR international normal ratio, TNM tumor-node-metastasis, TACE transarterial chemoembolization
Fig. 1X-tile plots of NLR on single-nodule small hepatocellular carcinoma following curative resection. The X-tile plots show the χ 2 log-rank values with cutpoint, producing low and high subgroups. a The X-axis represents all potential cut-off values from low to high (left to right) that define a low subset, whereas the Y-axis represents cut-off values from high to low (top to bottom) that define a high subset. Red coloration of cut-off values indicates an inverse correlation with time to recurrence, and green coloration represents direct associations. The optimal cut-off value occurs at the brightest pixel (green or red). b A histogram of the entire cohort divided into low and high subgroups according to the optimal cut-off value of NLR (2.1). c The statistical significance of relative risk (RR) generally assessed by Cox proportional hazards model. The X-axis represents all potential cut-off values from low to high (left to right), and the Y-axis of the graph is log of the relative risks. The red line is the optimal cutpoint of NLR (2.1). d A Kaplan-Meier plot of NLR for time to recurrence produced by the optimal cut-off value of NLR. Blue represents the low subgroup, and gray represents the high subgroup
Prediction of survival and recurrence of patients with a single nodule of SHCC following curative resection
| Factors | OS | TTR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate multivariate | Univariate multivariate | |||||
|
| HR (95 % CI) |
|
| HR (95 % CI) |
| |
| Age (≤53 vs >53) | NS | NA | 0.004 | NS | ||
| AFP(≤20 vs >20) | NS | NA | 0.043 | NS | ||
| INR (≤1.0 vs >1.0) | 0.010 | NS | NS | NA | ||
| PLT counts (≤127 vs >127) | 0.046 | NS | NS | NA | ||
| Neutrophil counts | 0.040 | 0.329 (0.174–0.623) | 0.001 | NS | NA | |
| Vascular invasion (yes vs no) | NS | NA | 0.001 | 1.757 (1.110–2.781) | 0.016 | |
| Tumor size (≤3.0 vs >3.0) | 0.040 | NS | <0.001 | NS | ||
| Postoperative TACE (yes vs no) | 0.001 | 2.566 (1.488–4.424) | 0.001 | <0.001 | 2.175 (1.408–3.359) | <0.001 |
| Re-operation (yes vs no) | NS | NA | <0.001 | 9.037 (4.970–16.432) | <0.001 | |
| NLR (>2.1 vs ≤2.1) | 0.014 | 3.013 (1.633–5.561) | <0.001 | 0.002 | 1.619 (1.057–2.478) | 0.027 |
Univariate analysis Kaplan-Meier method, Multivariate analysis Cox proportional hazards regression model, SHCC small hepatocellular carcinoma, AFP alpha-fetoprotein, INR international normal ratio, PLT platelet, TACE transarterial chemoembolization, NLR neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, OS overall survival, TTR time to recurrence, HR hazard ratio, NS not significant, NA not adopted
Fig. 2Prognostic values of preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and postoperative transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). a, b Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS) of NLR which were divided into low (NLR ≤ 2.1) and high (NLR > 2.1) subgroups, respectively. c, d TTR (c) and OS (d) of patients with or without postoperative TACE by Kaplan-Meier analyses, respectively
Fig. 3Kaplan-Meier analyses of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in the low AFP subgroup (≤400 ng/mL). NLR was divided into low (NLR ≤ 2.1) and high (NLR > 2.1) subgroups by X-tile. In the low AFP subgroup (≤400 ng/mL), NLR could predict time to recurrence (a) and overall survival (b), respectively