Literature DB >> 26328822

Electronic spectra from TDDFT and machine learning in chemical space.

Raghunathan Ramakrishnan1, Mia Hartmann2, Enrico Tapavicza2, O Anatole von Lilienfeld1.   

Abstract

Due to its favorable computational efficiency, time-dependent (TD) density functional theory (DFT) enables the prediction of electronic spectra in a high-throughput manner across chemical space. Its predictions, however, can be quite inaccurate. We resolve this issue with machine learning models trained on deviations of reference second-order approximate coupled-cluster (CC2) singles and doubles spectra from TDDFT counterparts, or even from DFT gap. We applied this approach to low-lying singlet-singlet vertical electronic spectra of over 20 000 synthetically feasible small organic molecules with up to eight CONF atoms. The prediction errors decay monotonously as a function of training set size. For a training set of 10 000 molecules, CC2 excitation energies can be reproduced to within ±0.1 eV for the remaining molecules. Analysis of our spectral database via chromophore counting suggests that even higher accuracies can be achieved. Based on the evidence collected, we discuss open challenges associated with data-driven modeling of high-lying spectra and transition intensities.

Year:  2015        PMID: 26328822     DOI: 10.1063/1.4928757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  17 in total

1.  Machine Learning for Electronically Excited States of Molecules.

Authors:  Julia Westermayr; Philipp Marquetand
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Machine learning the frontier orbital energies of SubPc based triads.

Authors:  Freja E Storm; Linnea M Folkmann; Thorsten Hansen; Kurt V Mikkelsen
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 2.172

3.  Deep learning of dynamically responsive chemical Hamiltonians with semiempirical quantum mechanics.

Authors:  Guoqing Zhou; Nicholas Lubbers; Kipton Barros; Sergei Tretiak; Benjamin Nebgen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 4.  Ab Initio Machine Learning in Chemical Compound Space.

Authors:  Bing Huang; O Anatole von Lilienfeld
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Machine learning exciton dynamics.

Authors:  Florian Häse; Stéphanie Valleau; Edward Pyzer-Knapp; Alán Aspuru-Guzik
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 9.825

6.  MoleculeNet: a benchmark for molecular machine learning.

Authors:  Zhenqin Wu; Bharath Ramsundar; Evan N Feinberg; Joseph Gomes; Caleb Geniesse; Aneesh S Pappu; Karl Leswing; Vijay Pande
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 9.825

7.  Atomic structures and orbital energies of 61,489 crystal-forming organic molecules.

Authors:  Annika Stuke; Christian Kunkel; Dorothea Golze; Milica Todorović; Johannes T Margraf; Karsten Reuter; Patrick Rinke; Harald Oberhofer
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 6.444

8.  Visualization of very large high-dimensional data sets as minimum spanning trees.

Authors:  Daniel Probst; Jean-Louis Reymond
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 5.514

9.  Dataset Construction to Explore Chemical Space with 3D Geometry and Deep Learning.

Authors:  Jianing Lu; Song Xia; Jieyu Lu; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Nonadiabatic Excited-State Dynamics with Machine Learning.

Authors:  Pavlo O Dral; Mario Barbatti; Walter Thiel
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 6.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.