Literature DB >> 26328698

The effect of phonetic production training with visual feedback on the perception and production of foreign speech sounds.

Natalia Kartushina1, Alexis Hervais-Adelman2, Ulrich Hans Frauenfelder1, Narly Golestani2.   

Abstract

Second-language learners often experience major difficulties in producing non-native speech sounds. This paper introduces a training method that uses a real-time analysis of the acoustic properties of vowels produced by non-native speakers to provide them with immediate, trial-by-trial visual feedback about their articulation alongside that of the same vowels produced by native speakers. The Mahalanobis acoustic distance between non-native productions and target native acoustic spaces was used to assess L2 production accuracy. The experiment shows that 1 h of training per vowel improves the production of four non-native Danish vowels: the learners' productions were closer to the corresponding Danish target vowels after training. The production performance of a control group remained unchanged. Comparisons of pre- and post-training vowel discrimination performance in the experimental group showed improvements in perception. Correlational analyses of training-related changes in production and perception revealed no relationship. These results suggest, first, that this training method is effective in improving non-native vowel production. Second, training purely on production improves perception. Finally, it appears that improvements in production and perception do not systematically progress at equal rates within individuals.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26328698     DOI: 10.1121/1.4926561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Can perceptual training alter the effect of visual biofeedback in speech-motor learning?

Authors:  Adam Klaus; Daniel R Lametti; Douglas M Shiller; Tara McAllister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Individual predictors of response to biofeedback training for second-language production.

Authors:  Joanne Jingwen Li; Samantha Ayala; Daphna Harel; Douglas M Shiller; Tara McAllister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Toward an index of oral somatosensory acuity: Comparison of three measures in adults.

Authors:  Olesia Gritsyk; Heather Kabakoff; Joanne Jingwen Li; Samantha Ayala; Douglas M Shiller; Tara McAllister
Journal:  Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups       Date:  2021-03-30

4.  Does Voicing Affect Patterns of Transfer in Nonnative Cluster Learning?

Authors:  Hung-Shao Cheng; Adam Buchwald
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Effects of Ultrasound Familiarization on Production and Perception of Nonnative Contrasts.

Authors:  Kevin D Roon; Jaekoo Kang; D H Whalen
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 1.324

Review 6.  Is the Sensorimotor Cortex Relevant for Speech Perception and Understanding? An Integrative Review.

Authors:  Malte R Schomers; Friedemann Pulvermüller
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Vocal Tract Images Reveal Neural Representations of Sensorimotor Transformation During Speech Imitation.

Authors:  Daniel Carey; Marc E Miquel; Bronwen G Evans; Patti Adank; Carolyn McGettigan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  The Penefit of Salience: Salient Accented, but Not Unaccented Words Reveal Accent Adaptation Effects.

Authors:  Ann-Kathrin Grohe; Andrea Weber
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-06-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.