Literature DB >> 26328140

The impact of educational sessions provided on prostate cancer, and its screening tests on the knowledge level, and participation behavior of the individuals in questionnaire surveys.

Cantürk Çapık1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to inform male participants aged fifty and older who have not been diagnosed with prostate cancer about prostate cancer screenings and to examine their participation behavior in these screenings.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, in which an experimental design with a pretest-posttest control group was used, data were collected from 3 family health centers in the city center of Kars between April and July 2013. The sample group consisted of 113 male participants aged fifty years or over. A personal information and a knowledge test forms about prostate cancer screening were used to collect the data. The statistical power of the study was determined to be 0.99.
RESULTS: The mean pretest knowledge scores of the participants were determined be similar. In the posttest, the mean knowledge score of the experimental group was significantly increased compared to that of the control group. In terms of screening participation frequency, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups during the period after the training. The knowledge level was higher in patients who had previously undergone a prostate examination and/or their prostate specific antigen (PSA) level measured or those with a family history of prostate cancer or in cases with a history of a benign prostatic disease.
CONCLUSION: This study revealed that the knowledge level of the risk group can be increased by training. The study also found that the increase in the knowledge level did not affect the participation behavior of the individuals in the screening tests.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Early detection; prostate cancer; screenings; training

Year:  2014        PMID: 26328140      PMCID: PMC4548640          DOI: 10.5152/tud.2014.80688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Urol        ISSN: 2149-3235


  14 in total

Review 1.  Prostate cancer overview.

Authors:  Mary Weinstein Dunn; Meredith Wallace Kazer
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.315

2.  Informed decision making and prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing for prostate cancer: a randomised controlled trial exploring the impact of a brief patient decision aid on men's knowledge, attitudes and intention to be tested.

Authors:  Eila Watson; Paul Hewitson; Joanne Brett; Colleen Bukach; Rhodri Evans; Adrian Edwards; Glyn Elwyn; Anna Cargill; Joan Austoker
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-07-27

3.  Digital rectal examination is barrier to population-based prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Harris M Nagler; Eric W Gerber; Peter Homel; Joseph R Wagner; Jennifer Norton; Steven Lebovitch; John L Phillips
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Knowledge of the limitations associated with prostate cancer screening among low-income men.

Authors:  Sally P Weinrich; Rachelle Seger; Barbara L Miller; Carrie Davis; Sanggil Kim; Courtney Wheeler; Martin Weinrich
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.592

5.  Randomized trial examining the effect of two prostate cancer screening educational interventions on patient knowledge, preferences, and behaviors.

Authors:  Melissa R Partin; David Nelson; David Radosevich; Sean Nugent; Ann B Flood; Nancy Dillon; Jeremy Holtzman; Michele Haas; Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Men's knowledge and beliefs about prostate cancer: education, race, and screening status.

Authors:  Julie A Winterich; Joseph G Grzywacz; Sara A Quandt; Peter E Clark; David P Miller; Joshua Acuña; Mark B Dignan; Thomas A Arcury
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.847

7.  Measuring patient knowledge of the risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  David M Radosevich; Melissa R Partin; Sean Nugent; David Nelson; Ann Barry Flood; Jeremy Holtzman; Nancy Dillon; Michele Haas; Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2004-08

8.  The relationship between prostate cancer knowledge and beliefs and intentions to attend PSA screening among at-risk men.

Authors:  David Hevey; Maria Pertl; Kevin Thomas; Laura Maher; Siobhan Ní Chuinneagáin; Agnella Craig
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-10-10

9.  Screening for prostate cancer: a guidance statement from the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians.

Authors:  Amir Qaseem; Michael J Barry; Thomas D Denberg; Douglas K Owens; Paul Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Public knowledge of benefits of breast and prostate cancer screening in Europe.

Authors:  Gerd Gigerenzer; Jutta Mata; Ronald Frank
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  1 in total

1.  Sex differences in the use of healthcare services among US adults with and without a cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Clinton Burnside; Tamaro Hudson; Carla Williams; William Lawson; Adeyinka O Laiyemo
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.