Literature DB >> 23567643

Screening for prostate cancer: a guidance statement from the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians.

Amir Qaseem1, Michael J Barry1, Thomas D Denberg1, Douglas K Owens1, Paul Shekelle1.   

Abstract

DESCRIPTION: Prostate cancer is an important health problem in men. It rarely causes death in men younger than 50 years; most deaths associated with it occur in men older than 75 years. The benefits of screening with the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test are outweighed by the harms for most men. Prostate cancer never becomes clinically significant in a patient's lifetime in a considerable proportion of men with prostate cancer detected with the PSA test. They will receive no benefit and are subject to substantial harms from the treatment of prostate cancer. The American College of Physicians (ACP) developed this guidance statement for clinicians by assessing current prostate cancer screening guidelines developed by other organizations. ACP believes that it is more valuable to provide clinicians with a rigorous review of available guidelines rather than develop a new guideline on the same topic when several guidelines are available on a topic or when existing guidelines conflict. The purpose of this guidance statement is to critically review available guidelines to help guide internists and other clinicians in making decisions about screening for prostate cancer. The target patient population for this guidance statement is all adult men.
METHODS: This guidance statement is derived from an appraisal of available guidelines on screening for prostate cancer. Authors searched the National Guideline Clearinghouse to identify prostate cancer screening guidelines in the United States and selected 4 developed by the American College of Preventive Medicine, American Cancer Society, American Urological Association, and U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. The AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation in Europe) instrument was used to evaluate the guidelines. GUIDANCE STATEMENT 1: ACP recommends that clinicians inform men between the age of 50 and 69 years about the limited potential benefits and substantial harms of screening for prostate cancer. ACP recommends that clinicians base the decision to screen for prostate cancer using the prostate-specific antigen test on the risk for prostate cancer, a discussion of the benefits and harms of screening, the patient's general health and life expectancy, and patient preferences. ACP recommends that clinicians should not screen for prostate cancer using the prostate-specific antigen test in patients who do not express a clear preference for screening. GUIDANCE STATEMENT 2: ACP recommends that clinicians should not screen for prostate cancer using the prostate-specific antigen test in average-risk men under the age of 50 years, men over the age of 69 years, or men with a life expectancy of less than 10 to 15 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23567643     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-10-201305210-00633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  101 in total

1.  Prostate-specific antigen testing after the US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation: a population-based analysis of electronic health data.

Authors:  Daniel M Frendl; Mara M Epstein; Hassan Fouayzi; Richard Krajenta; Benjamin A Rybicki; Mitchell H Sokoloff
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Latino men and familial risk communication about prostate cancer.

Authors:  Elisabeth M Hicks; Mark S Litwin; Sally L Maliski
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.172

3.  A Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Trial for PSA Screening Decision Support Interventions in Two Primary Care Settings.

Authors:  Carmen L Lewis; Jared Adams; Ming Tai-Seale; Qiwen Huang; Sarah B Knowles; Matthew E Nielsen; Michael P Pignone; Louise C Walter; Dominick L Frosch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Prostate cancer screening: a complicated puzzle, explanation needed.

Authors:  Barak Gaster
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Influence of Age, Health, and Function on Cancer Screening in Older Adults with Limited Life Expectancy.

Authors:  Nancy L Schoenborn; Jin Huang; Orla C Sheehan; Jennifer L Wolff; David L Roth; Cynthia M Boyd
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Expected population impacts of discontinued prostate-specific antigen screening.

Authors:  Roman Gulati; Alex Tsodikov; Ruth Etzioni; Rachel A Hunter-Merrill; John L Gore; Angela B Mariotto; Matthew R Cooperberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Development and Validation of a 10-Year Mortality Prediction Model: Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant Data From Five Cohorts of Older Adults in Developed and Developing Countries.

Authors:  Claudia Kimie Suemoto; Peter Ueda; Hiram Beltrán-Sánchez; Maria Lucia Lebrão; Yeda Aparecida Duarte; Rebeca Wong; Goodarz Danaei
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.053

8.  Impact of patient navigation on timely cancer care: the Patient Navigation Research Program.

Authors:  Karen M Freund; Tracy A Battaglia; Elizabeth Calhoun; Julie S Darnell; Donald J Dudley; Kevin Fiscella; Martha L Hare; Nancy LaVerda; Ji-Hyun Lee; Paul Levine; David M Murray; Steven R Patierno; Peter C Raich; Richard G Roetzheim; Melissa Simon; Frederick R Snyder; Victoria Warren-Mears; Elizabeth M Whitley; Paul Winters; Gregory S Young; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Do Men Receive Information Required for Shared Decision Making About PSA Testing? Results from a National Survey.

Authors:  Bryan Leyva; Alexander Persoskie; Allison Ottenbacher; Jada G Hamilton; Jennifer D Allen; Sarah C Kobrin; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Patient-Provider Communication About Prostate Cancer Screening and Treatment: New Evidence From the Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Soumitra S Bhuyan; Aastha Chandak; Niodita Gupta; Sudhir Isharwal; Chad LaGrange; Asos Mahmood; Dan Gentry
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.