Tunç Özdemir1, Ahmet Arıkan1. 1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Bladder augmentation with uroepithelium lined material yields an absence of mucus production, with reduced possibility of urinary infection and lithiasis. The utilization of the ureter in augmentation cystoplasty results in a uroepithelium-lined neobladder with all of the appropriate histologic layers. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of ureterocystoplasty in children with a small bladder capacity and low bladder compliance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 1992 and August 2011, six females and eight males who were 3 to 13 years old (median age 6 years) and had a low-capacity, poorly compliant bladder underwent augmentation cystoplasty using dilated ureters. Unilateral non-functioning renal moiety draining into a massively dilated ureter was present in every patient. The etiology of hydroureteronephrosis was a neurogenic bladder secondary to meningomyelocele in five patients, a posterior urethral valve in four patients, an obstructive megaureter in three patients and ectopic obstructive ureterocele in two patients. RESULTS: Mean age was 6 years (3-13 y). Clinical improvement regarding the resolution of reflux, a better bladder capacity and improved compliance was achieved in every patient. The increase in bladder capacity ranged from 84 cc (30 to 200) to 235 cc (150 to 420), with a mean increase of 318% (210 to 500). Marked improvement in compliance was also observed (from 1.2 to 5.1 mL/cm H2O, mean 2.4, to 22 to 50 mL/cm H2O, mean 41). No uninhibited bladder contractions were detected during a urodynamic study at 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: In patients with a low-capacity, poorly compliant bladder, augmentation cystoplasty using the ureter seems to be a viable alternative. Ureterocystoplasty results in a large-capacity, high-compliance bladder, without metabolic and infective complications, compared with other techniques of augmentation cystoplasty.
OBJECTIVE: Bladder augmentation with uroepithelium lined material yields an absence of mucus production, with reduced possibility of urinary infection and lithiasis. The utilization of the ureter in augmentation cystoplasty results in a uroepithelium-lined neobladder with all of the appropriate histologic layers. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of ureterocystoplasty in children with a small bladder capacity and low bladder compliance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 1992 and August 2011, six females and eight males who were 3 to 13 years old (median age 6 years) and had a low-capacity, poorly compliant bladder underwent augmentation cystoplasty using dilated ureters. Unilateral non-functioning renal moiety draining into a massively dilated ureter was present in every patient. The etiology of hydroureteronephrosis was a neurogenic bladder secondary to meningomyelocele in five patients, a posterior urethral valve in four patients, an obstructive megaureter in three patients and ectopic obstructive ureterocele in two patients. RESULTS: Mean age was 6 years (3-13 y). Clinical improvement regarding the resolution of reflux, a better bladder capacity and improved compliance was achieved in every patient. The increase in bladder capacity ranged from 84 cc (30 to 200) to 235 cc (150 to 420), with a mean increase of 318% (210 to 500). Marked improvement in compliance was also observed (from 1.2 to 5.1 mL/cm H2O, mean 2.4, to 22 to 50 mL/cm H2O, mean 41). No uninhibited bladder contractions were detected during a urodynamic study at 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: In patients with a low-capacity, poorly compliant bladder, augmentation cystoplasty using the ureter seems to be a viable alternative. Ureterocystoplasty results in a large-capacity, high-compliance bladder, without metabolic and infective complications, compared with other techniques of augmentation cystoplasty.