Literature DB >> 26328031

Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: How far have we come and where are we headed?

Shailesh V Shrikhande1, Masillamany Sivasanker1.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy is currently a feasible option in selected patients at high volume centers with available expertise. Although the procedure has been described two decades ago, laparoscopic surgeons have been reluctant to perform it since it is technically demanding. Currently there is no standardized training process for minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy and this is required to ensure the safety of the procedure. Even the open pancreatoduodenectomy can be a challenging procedure where the outcome depends much upon the patient volume and surgeon's experience. In the minimally invasive setting, all the current evidence comes from retrospective data with inherent selection bias. Although the proposed benefits have been reported in many series, a randomized trial comparing with the open approach is highly unlikely to happen, given the complexity of pancreatic cancer and patient selection for complex surgery. Rather, in a disease for which cure is an utopian statement, perhaps the ultimate aim of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy can be the improvement in the quality of life. Also further studies are needed to assess the immunologic role affecting the oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy. The robotic platforms have got easily accepted since they can overcome some of the limitations of the laparoscopic platforms such as limited range of motion, two dimensional visualization and poor ergonomics. The main limitations of robotic procedures are related to the high costs associated with the system and disposable equipment. Currently evidence is lacking regarding the cost effectiveness of the procedure and also the push from the industry is on rise. All these minimally invasive techniques have a long learning curve and prior extensive experience in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery is mandatory for surgeons embarking on these endeavours.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy; Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy; Roboticpancreatoduodenectomy

Year:  2015        PMID: 26328031      PMCID: PMC4550838          DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v7.i8.128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg


  23 in total

1.  A non-randomized comparative study of laparoscopy-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Tamotsu Kuroki; Tomohiko Adachi; Tatsuya Okamoto; Takashi Kanematsu
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr

2.  The learning curve in pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Jennifer F Tseng; Peter W T Pisters; Jeffrey E Lee; Huamin Wang; Henry F Gomez; Charlotte C Sun; Douglas B Evans
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 3.  Minimally-invasive vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Camilo Correa-Gallego; Helen E Dinkelspiel; Isabel Sulimanoff; Sarah Fisher; Eduardo F Viñuela; T Peter Kingham; Yuman Fong; Ronald P DeMatteo; Michael I D'Angelica; William R Jarnagin; Peter J Allen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the Accordion Severity Grading System.

Authors:  Horacio J Asbun; John A Stauffer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Major venous resection during total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Michael L Kendrick; Guido M Sclabas
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Evolution of pancreatoduodenectomy in a tertiary cancer center in India: improved results from service reconfiguration.

Authors:  Shailesh V Shrikhande; Savio George Barreto; B A Somashekar; Kunal Suradkar; Guruprasad S Shetty; Sanjay Talole; Bhawna Sirohi; Mahesh Goel; Parul J Shukla
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 3.996

7.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti; Fabio Sbrana; Francesco Maria Bianco; Enrique Fernando Elli; Galaxy Shah; Pietro Addeo; Giuseppe Caravaglios; Andrea Coratti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-09       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches?

Authors:  Kristopher P Croome; Michael B Farnell; Florencia G Que; K Marie Reid-Lombardo; Mark J Truty; David M Nagorney; Michael L Kendrick
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  U Boggi; S Signori; N De Lio; V G Perrone; F Vistoli; M Belluomini; C Cappelli; G Amorese; F Mosca
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Optimal duration and timing of adjuvant chemotherapy after definitive surgery for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: ongoing lessons from the ESPAC-3 study.

Authors:  Juan W Valle; Daniel Palmer; Richard Jackson; Trevor Cox; John P Neoptolemos; Paula Ghaneh; Charlotte L Rawcliffe; Claudio Bassi; Deborah D Stocken; David Cunningham; Derek O'Reilly; David Goldstein; Bridget A Robinson; Christos Karapetis; Andrew Scarfe; Francois Lacaine; Juhani Sand; Jakob R Izbicki; Julia Mayerle; Christos Dervenis; Attila Oláh; Giovanni Butturini; Pehr A Lind; Mark R Middleton; Alan Anthoney; Kate Sumpter; Ross Carter; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  1 in total

1.  Performance of Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy for Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor of Pancreas.

Authors:  Orlando Jorge M Torres; José Maria A Moraes Junior; Anmara Moura Moraes; Camila Cristina S Torres; Antonio Talvane T Oliveira
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2016-11-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.