Literature DB >> 26323767

Horizontal gene flow from Eubacteria to Archaebacteria and what it means for our understanding of eukaryogenesis.

Wasiu A Akanni1, Karen Siu-Ting2, Christopher J Creevey3, James O McInerney4, Mark Wilkinson5, Peter G Foster5, Davide Pisani6.   

Abstract

The origin of the eukaryotic cell is considered one of the major evolutionary transitions in the history of life. Current evidence strongly supports a scenario of eukaryotic origin in which two prokaryotes, an archaebacterial host and an α-proteobacterium (the free-living ancestor of the mitochondrion), entered a stable symbiotic relationship. The establishment of this relationship was associated with a process of chimerization, whereby a large number of genes from the α-proteobacterial symbiont were transferred to the host nucleus. A general framework allowing the conceptualization of eukaryogenesis from a genomic perspective has long been lacking. Recent studies suggest that the origins of several archaebacterial phyla were coincident with massive imports of eubacterial genes. Although this does not indicate that these phyla originated through the same process that led to the origin of Eukaryota, it suggests that Archaebacteria might have had a general propensity to integrate into their genomes large amounts of eubacterial DNA. We suggest that this propensity provides a framework in which eukaryogenesis can be understood and studied in the light of archaebacterial ecology. We applied a recently developed supertree method to a genomic dataset composed of 392 eubacterial and 51 archaebacterial genera to test whether large numbers of genes flowing from Eubacteria are indeed coincident with the origin of major archaebacterial clades. In addition, we identified two potential large-scale transfers of uncertain directionality at the base of the archaebacterial tree. Our results are consistent with previous findings and seem to indicate that eubacterial gene imports (particularly from δ-Proteobacteria, Clostridia and Actinobacteria) were an important factor in archaebacterial history. Archaebacteria seem to have long relied on Eubacteria as a source of genetic diversity, and while the precise mechanism that allowed these imports is unknown, we suggest that our results support the view that processes comparable to those through which eukaryotes emerged might have been common in archaebacterial history.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Archaebacteria; Bayesian supertrees; symbiosis; tree of life

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26323767      PMCID: PMC4571575          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  68 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Mealybug beta-proteobacterial endosymbionts contain gamma-proteobacterial symbionts.

Authors:  C D von Dohlen; S Kohler; S T Alsop; W R McManus
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-07-26       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection.

Authors:  Hidetoshi Shimodaira
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 15.683

4.  An archaeal origin for the actin cytoskeleton: Implications for eukaryogenesis.

Authors:  Rolf Bernander; Anders E Lind; Thijs J G Ettema
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2011-11-01

5.  Eukaryotic genes of archaebacterial origin are more important than the more numerous eubacterial genes, irrespective of function.

Authors:  James A Cotton; James O McInerney
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Does a tree-like phylogeny only exist at the tips in the prokaryotes?

Authors:  Christopher J Creevey; David A Fitzpatrick; Gayle K Philip; Rhoda J Kinsella; Mary J O'Connell; Melissa M Pentony; Simon A Travers; Mark Wilkinson; James O McInerney
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Measuring support and finding unsupported relationships in supertrees.

Authors:  Mark Wilkinson; Davide Pisani; James A Cotton; Ian Corfe
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 15.683

8.  Evidence that eukaryotes and eocyte prokaryotes are immediate relatives.

Authors:  M C Rivera; J A Lake
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-07-03       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models.

Authors:  Alexandros Stamatakis
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Stability of heterochiral hybrid membrane made of bacterial sn-G3P lipids and archaeal sn-G1P lipids.

Authors:  Haruo Shimada; Akihiko Yamagishi
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  The ring of life hypothesis for eukaryote origins is supported by multiple kinds of data.

Authors:  James McInerney; Davide Pisani; Mary J O'Connell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Biological action in Read-Write genome evolution.

Authors:  James A Shapiro
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 3.906

3.  Integrative modeling of gene and genome evolution roots the archaeal tree of life.

Authors:  Tom A Williams; Gergely J Szöllősi; Anja Spang; Peter G Foster; Sarah E Heaps; Bastien Boussau; Thijs J G Ettema; T Martin Embley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Changing ideas about eukaryotic origins.

Authors:  Tom A Williams; T Martin Embley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  One step beyond a ribosome: The ancient anaerobic core.

Authors:  Filipa L Sousa; Shijulal Nelson-Sathi; William F Martin
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2016-05-02

Review 6.  Towards a Dynamic Interaction Network of Life to unify and expand the evolutionary theory.

Authors:  Eric Bapteste; Philippe Huneman
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 7.431

7.  Membrane Proteins Are Dramatically Less Conserved than Water-Soluble Proteins across the Tree of Life.

Authors:  Victor Sojo; Christophe Dessimoz; Andrew Pomiankowski; Nick Lane
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  FastRFS: fast and accurate Robinson-Foulds Supertrees using constrained exact optimization.

Authors:  Pranjal Vachaspati; Tandy Warnow
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  The origin and radiation of the phosphoprotein phosphatase (PPP) enzymes of Eukaryotes.

Authors:  David Kerk; Jordan F Mattice; Mario E Valdés-Tresanco; Sergei Yu Noskov; Kenneth K-S Ng; Greg B Moorhead
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.