Literature DB >> 26323752

Changing ideas about eukaryotic origins.

Tom A Williams1, T Martin Embley2.   

Abstract

The origin of eukaryotic cells is one of the most fascinating challenges in biology, and has inspired decades of controversy and debate. Recent work has led to major upheavals in our understanding of eukaryotic origins and has catalysed new debates about the roles of endosymbiosis and gene flow across the tree of life. Improved methods of phylogenetic analysis support scenarios in which the host cell for the mitochondrial endosymbiont was a member of the Archaea, and new technologies for sampling the genomes of environmental prokaryotes have allowed investigators to home in on closer relatives of founding symbiotic partners. The inference and interpretation of phylogenetic trees from genomic data remains at the centre of many of these debates, and there is increasing recognition that trees built using inadequate methods can prove misleading, whether describing the relationship of eukaryotes to other cells or the root of the universal tree. New statistical approaches show promise for addressing these questions but they come with their own computational challenges. The papers in this theme issue discuss recent progress on the origin of eukaryotic cells and genomes, highlight some of the ongoing debates, and suggest possible routes to future progress.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  eukaryotes; evolution; phylogenetics

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26323752      PMCID: PMC4571560          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  84 in total

1.  The root of the tree of life in the light of the covarion model.

Authors:  P Lopez; P Forterre; H Philippe
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  The rooting of the universal tree of life is not reliable.

Authors:  H Philippe; P Forterre
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 3.  Yesterday's polyploids and the mystery of diploidization.

Authors:  K H Wolfe
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Eukaryotic genes of archaebacterial origin are more important than the more numerous eubacterial genes, irrespective of function.

Authors:  James A Cotton; James O McInerney
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The 1.2-megabase genome sequence of Mimivirus.

Authors:  Didier Raoult; Stéphane Audic; Catherine Robert; Chantal Abergel; Patricia Renesto; Hiroyuki Ogata; Bernard La Scola; Marie Suzan; Jean-Michel Claverie
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Controls on development and diversity of Early Archean stromatolites.

Authors:  Abigail C Allwood; John P Grotzinger; Andrew H Knoll; Ian W Burch; Mark S Anderson; Max L Coleman; Isik Kanik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Lateral gene transfer.

Authors:  Olga Zhaxybayeva; W Ford Doolittle
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  The hydrogen hypothesis for the first eukaryote.

Authors:  W Martin; M Müller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-03-05       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  An evolutionary network of genes present in the eukaryote common ancestor polls genomes on eukaryotic and mitochondrial origin.

Authors:  Thorsten Thiergart; Giddy Landan; Marc Schenk; Tal Dagan; William F Martin
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Origins of major archaeal clades correspond to gene acquisitions from bacteria.

Authors:  Shijulal Nelson-Sathi; Filipa L Sousa; Mayo Roettger; Nabor Lozada-Chávez; Thorsten Thiergart; Arnold Janssen; David Bryant; Giddy Landan; Peter Schönheit; Bettina Siebers; James O McInerney; William F Martin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  The Physiology of Phagocytosis in the Context of Mitochondrial Origin.

Authors:  William F Martin; Aloysius G M Tielens; Marek Mentel; Sriram G Garg; Sven B Gould
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 2.  Biological action in Read-Write genome evolution.

Authors:  James A Shapiro
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 3.  Living Organisms Author Their Read-Write Genomes in Evolution.

Authors:  James A Shapiro
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-06

4.  Symbiosis in eukaryotic evolution.

Authors:  Purificación López-García; Laura Eme; David Moreira
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 5.  Arguments Reinforcing the Three-Domain View of Diversified Cellular Life.

Authors:  Arshan Nasir; Kyung Mo Kim; Violette Da Cunha; Gustavo Caetano-Anollés
Journal:  Archaea       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 3.273

Review 6.  Breath-giving cooperation: critical review of origin of mitochondria hypotheses : Major unanswered questions point to the importance of early ecology.

Authors:  István Zachar; Eörs Szathmáry
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 4.540

7.  Domain Cell Theory supports the independent evolution of the Eukarya, Bacteria and Archaea and the Nuclear Compartment Commonality hypothesis.

Authors:  James T Staley
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 6.411

Review 8.  Towards a Dynamic Interaction Network of Life to unify and expand the evolutionary theory.

Authors:  Eric Bapteste; Philippe Huneman
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 7.431

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.