Literature DB >> 26322648

Noninvasive Prenatal Genetic Testing: Current and Emerging Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues.

Mollie A Minear1, Stephanie Alessi, Megan Allyse, Marsha Michie, Subhashini Chandrasekharan.   

Abstract

Noninvasive prenatal genetic testing (NIPT) for chromosomal aneuploidy involving the analysis of cell-free fetal DNA became commercially available in 2011. The low false-positive rate of NIPT, which reduces unnecessary prenatal invasive diagnostic procedures, has led to broad clinician and patient adoption. We discuss the ethical, legal, and social issues raised by rapid and global dissemination of NIPT. The number of women using NIPT is anticipated to expand, and the number of conditions being tested for will continue to increase as well, raising concerns about the routinization of testing and negative impacts on informed decision making. Ensuring that accurate and balanced information is available to all pregnant women and that access to NIPT is equitable will require policy guidance from regulators, professional societies, and payers. Empirical evidence about stakeholders' perspectives and experiences will continue to be essential in guiding policy development so that advances in NIPT can be used effectively and appropriately to improve prenatal care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  disability and reproductive rights; fetal genome sequencing; genetic counseling; informed decision making; regulation and oversight

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26322648     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-090314-050000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet        ISSN: 1527-8204            Impact factor:   8.929


  22 in total

Review 1.  Prenatal and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Joris Robert Vermeesch; Thierry Voet; Koenraad Devriendt
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  How should costs and cost-effectiveness be considered in prenatal genetic testing?

Authors:  Teresa N Sparks; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.300

3.  Disability Experiences and Perspectives Regarding Reproductive Decisions, Parenting, and the Utility of Genetic Services: a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  C Roadhouse; C Shuman; K Anstey; K Sappleton; D Chitayat; E Ignagni
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Spanish- and English-Speaking Pregnant Women's Views on cfDNA and Other Prenatal Screening: Practical and Ethical Reflections.

Authors:  Erin Floyd; Megan A Allyse; Marsha Michie
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Is preparation a good reason for prenatal genetic testing? Ethical and critical questions.

Authors:  Marsha Michie
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  "I think we've got too many tests!": Prenatal providers' reflections on ethical and clinical challenges in the practice integration of cell-free DNA screening.

Authors:  B L Gammon; S A Kraft; M Michie; M Allyse
Journal:  Ethics Med Public Health       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

7.  Informed decision-making about prenatal cfDNA screening: An assessment of written materials.

Authors:  Marsha Michie; Stephanie A Kraft; Mollie A Minear; Roberta R Ryan; Megan A Allyse
Journal:  Ethics Med Public Health       Date:  2016-09-13

8.  Noninvasive Prenatal Whole Genome Sequencing: Pregnant Women's Views and Preferences.

Authors:  Haley K Sullivan; Michelle Bayefsky; Paul G Wakim; Kathi Huddleston; Barbara B Biesecker; Sara Chandros Hull; Benjamin E Berkman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 7.623

9.  Positive Attitudes towards Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) in a Swedish Cohort of 1,003 Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Ellika Sahlin; Magnus Nordenskjöld; Peter Gustavsson; Josephine Wincent; Susanne Georgsson; Erik Iwarsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Implementing non-invasive prenatal testing into publicly funded antenatal screening services for Down syndrome and other conditions in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Authors:  Sara Filoche; Fiona Cram; Bev Lawton; Angela Beard; Peter Stone
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.