Literature DB >> 26322647

Eugenics and Involuntary Sterilization: 1907-2015.

Philip R Reilly1.   

Abstract

In England during the late nineteenth century, intellectuals, especially Francis Galton, called for a variety of eugenic policies aimed at ensuring the health of the human species. In the United States, members of the Progressive movement embraced eugenic ideas, especially immigration restriction and sterilization. Indiana enacted the first eugenic sterilization law in 1907, and the US Supreme Court upheld such laws in 1927. State programs targeted institutionalized, mentally disabled women. Beginning in the late 1930s, proponents rationalized involuntary sterilization as protecting vulnerable women from unwanted pregnancy. By World War II, programs in the United States had sterilized approximately 60,000 persons. After the horrific revelations concerning Nazi eugenics (German Hereditary Health Courts approved at least 400,000 sterilization operations in less than a decade), eugenic sterilization programs in the United States declined rapidly. Simplistic eugenic thinking has faded, but coerced sterilization remains widespread, especially in China and India. In many parts of the world, involuntary sterilization is still intermittently used against minority groups.

Entities:  

Keywords:  heredity; immigration restriction; population control

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26322647     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-090314-024930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet        ISSN: 1527-8204            Impact factor:   8.929


  6 in total

1.  The Rise of Female Sterilization: A Closer Look at Colombia.

Authors:  Beatriz M Folch; Sarah Betstadt; Dongmei Li; Natalie Whaley
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-09

2.  Clinician perspectives on the need for training on caring for pregnant women with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Nili Amir; Lauren D Smith; Anne M Valentine; Monika Mitra; Susan L Parish; Tiffany A Moore Simas
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 2.554

3.  Ensuring the Reproductive Rights of Women with Intellectual Disability.

Authors:  Nicole Agaronnik; Elizabeth Pendo; Tara Lagu; Christene DeJong; Aixa Perez-Caraballo; Lisa I Iezzoni
Journal:  J Intellect Dev Disabil       Date:  2020-06-10

4.  Medical genetics and genomic medicine in the United States of America. Part 1: history, demographics, legislation, and burden of disease.

Authors:  Carlos R Ferreira; Debra S Regier; Donald W Hadley; P Suzanne Hart; Maximilian Muenke
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2017-07-16       Impact factor: 2.183

Review 5.  Inequity in Cardio-Oncology: Identifying Disparities in Cardiotoxicity and Links to Cardiac and Cancer Outcomes.

Authors:  Rachel E Ohman; Eric H Yang; Melissa L Abel
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 6.106

Review 6.  Landscape of germline cancer predisposition mutations testing and management in pediatrics: Implications for research and clinical care.

Authors:  Shilpa A Shahani; Erin L Marcotte
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.569

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.