Literature DB >> 26321386

Developing vitamin D dietary guidelines and the lack of 25-hydroxyvitamin D assay standardization: The ever-present past.

C T Sempos1, R A Durazo-Arvizu2, N Binkley3, J Jones4, J M Merkel5, G D Carter4.   

Abstract

Unstandardized laboratory measurement of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) confounds efforts to develop clinical and public health vitamin D guidelines. The Vitamin D Standardization Program (VDSP), an international collaborative effort, was founded in 2010 to correct this problem. Nearly all published vitamin D research is based on unstandardized laboratory 25(OH)D measurements. While it is impossible to standardize all old data, it may be possible to identify a small subset of prior studies critical to guidelines development. Once identified it may be possible to calibrate their 25(OH)D values to the NIST and Ghent University reference measurement procedures using VDSP methods thereby permitting future guidelines to be based on standardized results. We simulated the calibration of a small set of ten clinical trials of vitamin D supplementation on achieved 25(OH)D under minimal sun exposure. These studies were selected because they played a prominent role in setting the 2010 vitamin D dietary reference intakes (DRI). Using random-effects meta-regression analysis, Vitamin D External Quality Assessment (DEQAS) data on assay bias was used to simulate the potential bias due to the lack of assay standardization by calibrating the achieved 25(OH)D levels from those 10 studies to: (1) the largest negative, and (2) the largest positive bias from the DEQAS all laboratory trimmed mean (ALTM) for the appropriate assay and year of analysis. For a usual vitamin D intake of 600IU/day the difference in mean achieved 25(OH)D values for those two options was 20nmol/L. However, without re-calibration of 25(OH)D values it is impossible to know the degree to which any of the current guidelines may have been biased. This approach may help stimulate the search for and standardization of that small subset of key studies and, in the cases where standardization is impossible, to identify areas of urgently needed vitamin D research. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  25-Hydroxyvitamin D; CAP; DEQAS; NIST; PT/EQA; VDSP; Vitamin D

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26321386     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2015.08.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol        ISSN: 0960-0760            Impact factor:   4.292


  23 in total

Review 1.  Vitamin D assays and the definition of hypovitaminosis D: results from the First International Conference on Controversies in Vitamin D.

Authors:  Christopher T Sempos; Annemieke C Heijboer; Daniel D Bikle; Jens Bollerslev; Roger Bouillon; Patsy M Brannon; Hector F DeLuca; Glenville Jones; Craig F Munns; John P Bilezikian; Andrea Giustina; Neil Binkley
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Standardizing 25-hydroxyvitamin D data from the HunMen cohort.

Authors:  E Jakab; E Kalina; Z Petho; Z Pap; A Balogh; W B Grant; H P Bhattoa
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Optimal vitamin D supplementation strategies.

Authors:  Roger Bouillon
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.633

4.  Development of an algorithm to predict serum vitamin D levels using a simple questionnaire based on sunlight exposure.

Authors:  Edda Vignali; Enrico Macchia; Filomena Cetani; Giorgio Reggiardo; Luisella Cianferotti; Federica Saponaro; Claudio Marcocci
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.633

5.  The Reverse J-Shaped Association Between Serum Total 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentration and All-Cause Mortality: The Impact of Assay Standardization.

Authors:  Ramón A Durazo-Arvizu; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Holly Kramer; Guichan Cao; Joyce Merkel; Paul M Coates; Christopher T Sempos
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-04-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 6.  Vitamin D and cardiovascular disease prevention.

Authors:  Stefan Pilz; Nicolas Verheyen; Martin R Grübler; Andreas Tomaschitz; Winfried März
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 32.419

7.  Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation, Food Fortification, or Bolus Injection on Vitamin D Status in Children Aged 2-18 Years: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Neil R Brett; Nathalie Gharibeh; Hope A Weiler
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 8.701

8.  Short-term Variability of Vitamin D-Related Biomarkers.

Authors:  Pamela L Lutsey; Christina M Parrinello; Jeffrey R Misialek; Andy N Hoofnagle; Clark M Henderson; Thomas J Laha; Erin D Michos; John H Eckfeldt; Elizabeth Selvin
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Measurement of Vitamin D for Epidemiologic and Clinical Research: Shining Light on a Complex Decision.

Authors:  Anne Marie Z Jukic; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Pamela L Lutsey
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 10.  How can the orthopedic surgeon ensure optimal vitamin D status in patients operated for an osteoporotic fracture?

Authors:  T Chevalley; M L Brandi; E Cavalier; N C Harvey; G Iolascon; C Cooper; D Hannouche; J-F Kaux; A Kurth; S Maggi; G Maier; K Papavasiliou; N Al-Daghri; M Sosa-Henríquez; N Suhm; U Tarantino; J-Y Reginster; R Rizzoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.