Literature DB >> 26320717

Celluclast and Cellic® CTec2: Saccharification/fermentation of wheat straw, solid-liquid partition and potential of enzyme recycling by alkaline washing.

Ana Cristina Rodrigues1, Mai Østergaard Haven2, Jane Lindedam3, Claus Felby4, Miguel Gama5.   

Abstract

The hydrolysis/fermentation of wheat straw and the adsorption/desorption/deactivation of cellulases were studied using Cellic(®) CTec2 (Cellic) and Celluclast mixed with Novozyme 188. The distribution of enzymes - cellobiohydrolase I (Cel7A), endoglucanase I (Cel7B) and β-glucosidase - of the two formulations between the residual substrate and supernatant during the course of enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation was investigated. The potential of recyclability using alkaline wash was also studied. The efficiency of hydrolysis with an enzyme load of 10 FPU/g cellulose reached >98% using Cellic(®) CTec2, while for Celluclast a conversion of 52% and 81%, was observed without and with β-glucosidase supplementation, respectively. The decrease of Cellic(®) CTec2 activity observed along the process was related to deactivation of Cel7A rather than of Cel7B and β-glucosidase. The adsorption/desorption profiles during hydrolysis/fermentation revealed that a large fraction of active enzymes remained adsorbed to the solid residue throughout the process. Surprisingly, this was the case of Cel7A and β-glucosidase from Cellic, which remained adsorbed to the solid fraction along the entire process. Alkaline washing was used to recover the enzymes from the solid residue. This method allowed efficient recovery of Celluclast enzymes; however, this may be achieved only when minor amounts of cellulose remain present. Regarding the Cellic formulation, neither the presence of cellulose nor lignin restricted an efficient desorption of the enzymes at alkaline pH. This work shows that the recycling strategy must be customized for each particular formulation, since the enzymes found e.g. in Cellic and Celluclast bear quite different behaviour regarding the solid-liquid distribution, stability and cellulose and lignin affinity.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adsorption/desorption; Cellulases; Enzyme activity stability; Enzyme recycling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26320717     DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2015.06.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Enzyme Microb Technol        ISSN: 0141-0229            Impact factor:   3.493


  14 in total

1.  Experimental investigation of the adsorption and desorption of cellulase enzymes on zeolite-β for enzyme recycling applications.

Authors:  Surya R Jampana; Linjing Jia; Bandaru V Ramarao; Deepak Kumar
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  Effect of lignin-blocking agent on enzyme hydrolysis of acid pretreated hemp waste.

Authors:  Daehwan Kim; Chang Geun Yoo; Jurgen Schwarz; Sadanand Dhekney; Robert Kozak; Craig Laufer; Drew Ferrier; Skylar Mackay; Madyson Ashcraft; Richard Williams; Sinyeon Kim
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 4.036

3.  Characterization of three plant biomass-degrading microbial consortia by metagenomics- and metasecretomics-based approaches.

Authors:  Diego Javier Jiménez; Maria Julia de Lima Brossi; Julia Schückel; Stjepan Krešimir Kračun; William George Tycho Willats; Jan Dirk van Elsas
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Multimodal analysis of pretreated biomass species highlights generic markers of lignocellulose recalcitrance.

Authors:  Mickaël Herbaut; Aya Zoghlami; Anouck Habrant; Xavier Falourd; Loïc Foucat; Brigitte Chabbert; Gabriel Paës
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 6.040

5.  Determinants on an efficient cellulase recycling process for the production of bioethanol from recycled paper sludge under high solid loadings.

Authors:  Daniel Gomes; Miguel Gama; Lucília Domingues
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 6.040

6.  Engineering a highly active thermophilic β-glucosidase to enhance its pH stability and saccharification performance.

Authors:  Wei Xia; Xinxin Xu; Lichun Qian; Pengjun Shi; Yingguo Bai; Huiying Luo; Rui Ma; Bin Yao
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 6.040

7.  Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for efficient production of succinate from lignocellulosic hydrolysate.

Authors:  Yufeng Mao; Guiying Li; Zhishuai Chang; Ran Tao; Zhenzhen Cui; Zhiwen Wang; Ya-Jie Tang; Tao Chen; Xueming Zhao
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 6.040

8.  Evaluating the effect of enzymatic pretreatment on the anaerobic digestibility of pulp and paper biosludge.

Authors:  Sofia Bonilla; Zahra Choolaei; Torsten Meyer; Elizabeth A Edwards; Alexander F Yakunin; D Grant Allen
Journal:  Biotechnol Rep (Amst)       Date:  2018-01-05

9.  Fate of p-hydroxycinnamates and structural characteristics of residual hemicelluloses and lignin during alkaline-sulfite chemithermomechanical pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse.

Authors:  Felipe A M Reinoso; Jorge Rencoret; Ana Gutiérrez; Adriane M F Milagres; José C Del Río; André Ferraz
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 6.040

Review 10.  Industrial Use of Cell Wall Degrading Enzymes: The Fine Line Between Production Strategy and Economic Feasibility.

Authors:  Moira Giovannoni; Giovanna Gramegna; Manuel Benedetti; Benedetta Mattei
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-04-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.