Literature DB >> 26320223

Lateral Tibial Posterior Slope Is Increased in Patients With Early Graft Failure After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Joshua J Christensen1, Aaron J Krych1, William M Engasser1, Matthias K Vanhees2, Mark S Collins3, Diane L Dahm4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The lateral tibial posterior slope (LTPS) has been reported in multiple studies to correlate with an increased risk for native anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tearing. To date, no study has examined the effect of an increased LTPS as measured on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on the likelihood of ACL graft failure. HYPOTHESIS: An increased LTPS as measured on MRI would correlate with an increased risk for ACL graft failure. STUDY
DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: Fifty-eight patients were initially identified who experienced graft failure after primary ACL reconstruction and underwent revision between 1998 and 2009. Exclusion criteria were clinical follow-up of less than 4 years, graft failure occurring greater than 2 years after primary surgery, skeletal immaturity, deep infection, lack of available preoperative MRI, and history of trauma to the proximal tibia. This left 35 patients with early (within 2 years) failure of primary ACL reconstruction. These patients were matched to 35 control participants who had undergone ACL reconstruction with a minimum of 4 years of clinical follow-up and no evidence of graft failure. Patients were matched by age, sex, date of primary surgery, and graft type. The LTPS was then determined on MRI in a blinded fashion.
RESULTS: The mean time to failure in patients in the study group was 1 year (range, 0.6-1.4 years). The mean follow-up of those in the matched control group was 6.9 years (range, 4.0-13.9 years). The mean LTPS in the early ACL failure group was found to be 8.4°, which was significantly larger than that in the control group at 6.5° (P = .012). The odds ratio for graft failure considering a 2° increase in the LTPS was 1.6 (95% CI, 1.1-2.2) and continued to increase to 2.4 (95% CI, 1.2-5.0) and 3.8 (95% CI, 1.3-11.3) with 4° and 6° increases in the LTPS, respectively. No significant association was identified between graft type and graft failure.
CONCLUSION: An increased LTPS is associated with an increased risk for early ACL graft failure, regardless of graft type. Orthopaedic surgeons should consider measuring the LTPS as part of the preoperative assessment of ACL-injured patients.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL injury; ACL reconstruction; geometry; revision; tibial plateau

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26320223     DOI: 10.1177/0363546515597664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  45 in total

1.  Proximal tibial bony and meniscal slopes are higher in ACL injured subjects than controls: a comparative MRI study.

Authors:  Ashraf Elmansori; Timothy Lording; Raphaël Dumas; Khalifa Elmajri; Philippe Neyret; Sébastien Lustig
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Tibial slope and medial meniscectomy significantly influence short-term knee laxity following ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  David Dejour; Marco Pungitore; Jeremy Valluy; Luca Nover; Mo Saffarini; Guillaume Demey
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Increased lateral tibial posterior slope is related to tibial tunnel widening after primary ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Soheil Sabzevari; Amir Ata Rahnemai-Azar; Humza S Shaikh; Justin W Arner; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Should Return to Sport be Delayed Until 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? Biological and Functional Considerations.

Authors:  Christopher V Nagelli; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Sex Differences in Anatomic Features Linked to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries During Skeletal Growth and Maturation.

Authors:  Shayan Hosseinzadeh; Ata M Kiapour
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Posteromedially placed plates with anterior staple reinforcement are not successful in decreasing tibial slope in opening-wedge proximal tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Chase S Dean; Jorge Chahla; Lauren M Matheny; Tyler R Cram; Samuel G Moulton; Grant J Dornan; Justin J Mitchell; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Slope-reducing tibial osteotomy decreases ACL-graft forces and anterior tibial translation under axial load.

Authors:  Florian B Imhoff; Julian Mehl; Brendan J Comer; Elifho Obopilwe; Mark P Cote; Matthias J Feucht; James D Wylie; Andreas B Imhoff; Robert A Arciero; Knut Beitzel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Steeper posterior tibial slope correlates with greater tibial tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Kanto Nagai; Yasutaka Tashiro; Elmar Herbst; Tom Gale; Joon Ho Wang; James J Irrgang; William Anderst; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Geometric Risk Factors Associated With Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Rupture.

Authors:  James G Levins; Daniel R Sturnick; Erin C Argentieri; Mack Gardner-Morse; Pamela M Vacek; Michael J Desarno; Timothy W Tourville; James R Slauterbeck; Bruce D Beynnon
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  The REVision Using Imaging to Guide Staging and Evaluation (REVISE) in ACL Reconstruction Classification.

Authors:  Darren de Sa; Raphael J Crum; Stephen Rabuck; Olufemi Ayeni; Asheesh Bedi; Michael Baraga; Alan Getgood; Scott Kaar; Eric Kropf; Craig Mauro; Devin Peterson; Dharmesh Vyas; Volker Musahl; Bryson P Lesniak
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.