Literature DB >> 26319204

High complication rate after syndesmotic screw removal.

Mette Renate Andersen1, Frede Frihagen2, Jan Erik Madsen3, Wender Figved4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the rate of complications after routine syndesmotic screw removal.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent syndesmotic screw removal at our hospital between 2007 and 2012 were included in the study. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, radiographic evaluation and complications were recorded from the patients' charts. Questionnaires were sent by postal mail to all patients, to measure patient satisfaction and pain (VAS scales).
RESULTS: 161 patients were included in the trial. A wound infection was found in 8 (5%) patients. 3 were regarded as serious infections requiring hospitalisation and intravenous antibiotics, 2 of those required surgical revisions. 5 patients were treated by oral antibiotics. Staphylococcus aureus was identified as the causing organism in all (6/8) cases with a positive culture. The patients with postoperative infection reported more pain (5.3 vs. 2.3; p=0.02) and were less satisfied (4.7 vs. 7.6; p=0.014) with their ankle compared to those without infection (T-test for independent samples).
CONCLUSION: There were 5% wound infections after routine syndesmotic screw removal. Routine antibiotic prophylaxis effective against S. aureus should be administered when removing syndesmotic screws. In our institution we now use one single dose Cefalotin of 2g intravenously 30-60min before screw removal.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle fractures; Complications; Screw removal; Surgical prophylaxis; Surgical site infection; Syndesmotic

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26319204     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.08.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  9 in total

1.  Use of Suture Button in the Treatment of Syndesmosis Injuries.

Authors:  Mette Renate Andersen; Wender Figved
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2018-05-09

2.  Effect of Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Surgical Site Infections Following Removal of Orthopedic Implants Used for Treatment of Foot, Ankle, and Lower Leg Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Manouk Backes; Siem A Dingemans; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; H Rogier van den Berg; Bart van Dijkman; Jochem M Hoogendoorn; Pieter Joosse; Ewan D Ritchie; W Herbert Roerdink; Judith P M Schots; Nico L Sosef; Ingrid J B Spijkerman; Bas A Twigt; Alexander H van der Veen; Ruben N van Veen; Jefrey Vermeulen; Dagmar I Vos; Jasper Winkelhagen; J Carel Goslings; Tim Schepers
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Application of an arched, Ni-Ti shape-memory connector in repairing distal tibiofibular syndesmosis ligament injury.

Authors:  Jinbo Zhao; Yuntong Zhang; Yan Xia; Xuhui Wang; Shuogui Xu; Yang Xie
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 2.562

Review 4.  Removal of Syndesmotic Screw After Fixation in Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Omar Desouky; Amr Elseby; Ahmed H Ghalab
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-06-04

Review 5.  Management of syndesmotic injuries: What is the evidence?

Authors:  Marc Schnetzke; Sven Y Vetter; Nils Beisemann; Benedict Swartman; Paul A Grützner; Jochen Franke
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-11-18

6.  Differences in gait analysis and clinical outcome after TightRope® or screw fixation in acute syndesmosis rupture: study protocol for a prospective randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Julian Doll; Stefan Waizenegger; Thomas Bruckner; Gerhard Schmidmaier; Sebastian I Wolf; Christian Fischer
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Randomized trial comparing suture button with single 3.5 mm syndesmotic screw for ankle syndesmosis injury: similar results at 2 years.

Authors:  Benedikte Wendt Ræder; Ingrid Kvello Stake; Jan Erik Madsen; Frede Frihagen; Silje Berild Jacobsen; Mette Renate Andersen; Wender Figved
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 8.  A systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw in the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.

Authors:  Pei Zhang; Yuan Liang; Jinshan He; Yongchao Fang; Pengtao Chen; Jingcheng Wang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Evidence-Based Surgical Treatment Algorithm for Unstable Syndesmotic Injuries.

Authors:  Markus Regauer; Gordon Mackay; Owen Nelson; Wolfgang Böcker; Christian Ehrnthaller
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.