Literature DB >> 26318351

Minimalist transcatheter aortic valve replacement: The new standard for surgeons and cardiologists using transfemoral access?

Hanna A Jensen1, Jose F Condado2, Chandan Devireddy2, Jose Binongo3, Bradley G Leshnower1, Vasilis Babaliaros2, Eric L Sarin1, Stamatios Lerakis2, Robert A Guyton1, James P Stewart2, Amjadullah Q Syed1, Kreton Mavromatis2, Brian Kaebnick2, Mohammad Hossein Rajaei1, Lillian L Tsai1, Ayaz Rahman2, Amy Simone1, Patricia Keegan2, Peter C Block2, Vinod H Thourani4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A minimalist approach for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (MA-TAVR) utilizing transfemoral access under conscious sedation and transthoracic echocardiography is increasing in popularity. This relatively novel technique may necessitate a learning period to achieve proficiency in performing a successful and safe procedure. This report evaluates our MA-TAVR cohort with specific characterization between our early, midterm, and recent experience.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 151 consecutive patients who underwent MA-TAVR with surgeons and interventionists equally as primary operator at Emory University between May 2012 and July 2014. Our institution had performed 300 TAVR procedures before implementation of MA-TAVR. Patient characteristics and early outcomes were compared using Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 definitions among 3 groups: group 1 included the first 50 patients, group 2 included patients 51 to 100, and group 3 included patients 101 to 151.
RESULTS: Median age for all patients was 84 years and similar among groups. The majority of patients were men (56%) and the median ejection fraction for all patients was 55% (interquartile range, 38.0%-60.0%). The majority of patients were high-risk surgical candidates with a median Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality of 10.0% and similar among groups. The overall major stroke rate was 3.3%, major vascular complications occurred in 3% of patients, and greater-than-mild paravalvular leak rate was 7%. In-hospital mortality and morbidity were similar among all 3 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In a high-volume TAVR center, transition to MA-TAVR is feasible with acceptable outcomes and a diminutive procedural learning curve. We advocate for TAVR centers to actively pursue the minimalist technique with equal representation by cardiologists and surgeons.
Copyright © 2015 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic valve; percutaneous; replacement; transapical

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26318351     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  15 in total

1.  Safe implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Molly Szerlip; Deborah Tabachnick; Mohanad Hamandi; LuAnn Caras; Allison T Lanfear; John J Squiers; Katherine Harrington; Srinivasa P Potluri; J Michael DiMaio; Jordan Wooley; Benjamin Pollock; Justin M Schaffer; William T Brinkman; David L Brown; Michael J Mack
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2020-09-23

Review 2.  How to Image and Manage Prosthesis-Related Complications After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Nina C Wunderlich; Jörg Honold; Martin J Swaans; Robert J Siegel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  A proctoring system to manage the learning curve associated with the introduction of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Japan.

Authors:  Masahiro Yamawaki; Kiyotaka Iwasaki; Motoharu Araki; Tsutomu Ito; Yoshiaki Ito; Norio Tada; Kensuke Takagi; Futoshi Yamanaka; Yusuke Watanabe; Masanori Yamamoto; Shinichi Shirai; Kentaro Hayashida
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 4.  The transition from transesophageal to transthoracic echocardiography during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: an evolving field.

Authors:  Menhel Kinno; Eric P Cantey; Vera H Rigolin
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2018-11-21

5.  Stent and leaflet stresses in a 26-mm first-generation balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve.

Authors:  Yue Xuan; Kapil Krishnan; Jian Ye; Danny Dvir; Julius M Guccione; Liang Ge; Elaine E Tseng
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 6.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Outcomes, Indications, Complications, and Innovations.

Authors:  Michael N Young; Ignacio Inglessis
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-09-22

7.  Technical and clinical study of x-ray-based surface echo probe tracking using an attached fiducial apparatus.

Authors:  Lindsay E Bodart; Benjamin R Ciske; Jonathan Le; Nicole M Reilly; Roderick C Deaño; Steven M Ewer; Parag Tipnis; Peter S Rahko; Martin G Wagner; Amish N Raval; Michael A Speidel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  Advances in transcatheter aortic valve implantation, part 2: perioperative care.

Authors:  M Charlesworth; B G Williams; M H Buch
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2021-03-19

9.  Comparison of Deep Sedation With General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair.

Authors:  Johannes Patzelt; Miriam Ulrich; Harry Magunia; Reinhard Sauter; Michal Droppa; Rezo Jorbenadze; Annika S Becker; Tobias Walker; Ralph Stephan von Bardeleben; Christian Grasshoff; Peter Rosenberger; Meinrad Gawaz; Peter Seizer; Harald F Langer
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  In Touch But Out of Time: Aggressive Hospital Discharge and Readmissions After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Neal S Kleiman
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.