Literature DB >> 26318211

The value of frameworks as knowledge translation mechanisms to guide community participation practice in Ontario CHCs.

Stephanie Rose Montesanti1, Julia Abelson2, John N Lavis3, James R Dunn4.   

Abstract

The community participation literature has produced numerous frameworks to guide practice and evaluation of community participation strategies in the health sector. These frameworks are useful starting points for differentiating the approaches for involving people in planning and decision-making for health services, but have been critiqued for being too generic and ignoring that community participation is highly contextual and situational. Health service organizations across Canada and internationally have begun to respond to address this limitation by developing more context-specific community participation frameworks; however, such frameworks do not exist for Ontario Community Health Centres (CHCs)-local primary health care organizations with a mandate to engage marginalized groups in planning and decision-making for health services. We conducted a series of focus groups with staff members from four Ontario CHCs to: (1) examine the factors that would influence their use of a generic framework for community participation with marginalized populations; and (2) improve the "context-specificity" of this framework, to enhance its relevance to CHCs. Participants described the difficulty of organizing the contextual, multi-faceted and situational process of community participation that they experienced with marginalized populations into a single framework, which led them to question the value of using frameworks as a resource for guiding the design, implementation and evaluation of their community participation initiatives. Instead, participants revealed that tacit knowledge, in the form of professional and personal experience and local knowledge of a marginalized population, had a greater influence on guiding participation activities in Ontario CHCs. Our findings suggest that tacit knowledge is an essential feature of community participation practice and requires further exploration regarding its role in the community participation field.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canada; Community health centres (CHCs); Community participation; Health services; Knowledge translation; Marginalized populations

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26318211     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.08.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  5 in total

Review 1.  Achieving successful community engagement: a rapid realist review.

Authors:  E De Weger; N Van Vooren; K G Luijkx; C A Baan; H W Drewes
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Translation of a community palliative care intervention: Experience from West Bengal, India.

Authors:  Devi Vijay; Shahaduz Zaman; David Clark
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2018-05-31

3.  Moving from formative research to co-creation of interventions: insights from a community health system project in Mozambique, Nepal and Peru.

Authors:  David Beran; Maria Lazo-Porras; Maria Kathia Cardenas; François Chappuis; Albertino Damasceno; Nilambar Jha; Tavares Madede; Sarah Lachat; Silvana Perez Leon; Nathaly Aya Pastrana; Maria Amalia Pesantes; Suman Bahadur Singh; Sanjib Sharma; Claire Somerville; L Suzanne Suggs; J Jaime Miranda
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2018-11-16

4.  Understanding the motivations of patients: A co-designed project to understand the factors behind patient engagement.

Authors:  Tamara L McCarron; Thomas Noseworthy; Karen Moffat; Gloria Wilkinson; Sandra Zelinsky; Deborah White; Derek Hassay; Diane L Lorenzetti; Nancy J Marlett
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Searching for new community engagement approaches in the Netherlands: a realist qualitative study.

Authors:  E De Weger; N J E Van Vooren; H W Drewes; K G Luijkx; C A Baan
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.