Literature DB >> 26317852

Listeria monocytogenes Prevalence and Characteristics in Retail Raw Foods in China.

Shi Wu1, Qingping Wu2, Jumei Zhang2, Moutong Chen1, Ze An Yan2, Huijuan Hu1.   

Abstract

The prevalence and levels of Listeria monocytogenes in retail raw foods covering most provincial capitals in China were studied with testing of 1036 samples of vegetables, edible mushrooms, raw meat, aquatic products and quick-frozen products from September 2012 to January 2014. The total prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes was 20.0% (207/1036), and the most probable number (MPN) values of 65.7% of the positive samples ranged from 0.3 to 110 MPN/g. Geographical differences were observed in this survey, and the results of both qualitative and quantitative methods indicated that the levels in the samples from North China were higher than those in the samples from South China. A total of 248 isolates were analyzed, of which approximately half belonged to molecular serogroup 1/2a-3a (45.2%), followed by 1/2b-3b-7 (30.6%), 1/2c-3c (16.1%), 4b-4d-4e (5.2%) and 4a-4c (2.8%). Most of the isolates carried hly (100%), inlB (98.8%), inlA (99.6%), inlC (98.0%) and inlJ (99.2%), and 44.8% of the isolates were llsX-positive. Seventeen epidemic clones (ECs) were detected, with 7 strains belonging to ECI (2.8%) and 10 belonging to ECIII (4.03%). Resistance to clindamycin (46.8%) was commonly observed, and 59 strains (23.8%) were susceptible to all 14 tested antibiotics, whereas 84 (33.9%) showed an intermediate level of resistance or were resistant to two or more antibiotics, including 7 multi-resistant strains that exhibited resistance to more than 10 antibiotics. The data obtained in the present study provides useful information for assessment of the possible risk posed to Chinese consumers, and this information will have a significant public health impact in China. Furthermore, the presence of virulence markers, epidemic clones, as well as the antibiotic resistance amongst the isolates strongly implies that many of these strains might be capable of causing listeriosis, and more accurate treatment of human listeriosis with effective antibiotics should be considered. This research represents a more full-scale and systematical investigation of the prevalence of L. monocytogenes in retail raw foods in China, and it provides baseline information for Chinese regulatory authorities that will aid in the formulation of a regulatory framework for controlling L. monocytogenes with the aim of improving the microbiological safety of raw foods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26317852      PMCID: PMC4552630          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Listeria monocytogenes is a facultative intracellular pathogen that causes listeriosis, particularly in young, old, pregnant and immune-compromised individuals [1]. Infections with this bacterium are currently associated with a fatality rate of approximately 17%, which is the highest rate observed among foodborne pathogens [2]. L. monocytogenes is ubiquitous in the environment and can survive even under low temperatures and pH, high concentrations of salt or bile, oxidative stress, carbon starvation, and other adverse conditions [3]. Although ready-to-eat foods are important sources of L. monocytogenes, the contamination may occur in almost all types of raw food [4], with vegetables, milk, meat and seafood most frequently implicated [5]. Because ampicillin/penicillin and gentamicin are the primary antibiotics for listeriosis therapy, resistance to these antibiotics has been the focus of many previous studies [6-8]. In addition, single or multiple antibiotic-resistant L. monocytogenes strains isolated from food, the environment and clinics have also been frequently reported [9-11]. Consequently, it is necessary to increase the available data regarding the prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility of L. monocytogenes from various sources in different areas. Although 13 serotypes of L. monocytogenes strains have been observed, serotypes 1/2a, 1/2b, 1/2c and 4b account for more than 95% of human listeriosis cases [12]. The results of multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) indicated that these major serovars could be separated into distinct groups: I.1 (1/2a-3a), I.2 (1/2c-3c), II.1 (4b-4d-4e), II.2 (1/2b-3b-7) and III (4a-4c) [13]. According to Kathariou et al. [14], most major outbreaks result from a small number of epidemic clones (ECs) of L. monocytogenes, and Sauders et al. [15] suggested that many concurrent sporadic listeriosis cases were also caused by major ECs of L. monocytogenes. These ECs have been classified into seven groups (ECI, ECII, ECIII, ECIV, ECV, ECVI, and ECVII). ECI, ECII and ECIV within serotype 4b have been observed in several major outbreaks in different countries [14], whereas ECIII isolates within serotype 1/2a were identified during outbreaks in 1989 and 2000 in the United States and have been considered epidemiologically related because these isolates were detected in the same food processing plant with identical pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns using different restriction enzymes [16]. Moreover, multi-virulence-locus sequence typing (MVLST) was used to accurately identify other three ECs: ECV within serotype 1/2a from human listeriosis cases in Canada over two decades [17]; ECVI within serotype 1/2b and ECVII within serotype 1/2a from the 2011 US listeriosis outbreak linked to cantaloupe [18]. Based on these findings, it is reasonable to speculate that previously identified ECs might be involved in future listeriosis cases and outbreaks. Therefore, identification and tracking of these ECs is important for understanding long-term transmission of L. monocytogenes and the establishment of efficient surveillance systems for this pathogen. As an important foodborne pathogen, L. monocytogenes encompasses a spectrum of strains with varying virulence and pathogenicity. Differentiation between virulent and non-virulent strains is significant for evaluating the potential implications of the presence of this microorganism for food safety and public health [19]. Many putative virulence markers in L. monocytogenes, such as surface-associated internalins, have been implicated in the pathogenesis of human listeriosis [8]. The virulence factors InlA (which is responsible for the internalization of L. monocytogenes into epithelial intestinal cells), InlC (which plays an essential role in cell-to-cell spreading), and InlJ (which is directly involved in passage through the intestinal barrier and in subsequent stages of infection) are considered key virulence factors of L. monocytogenes [20]. In addition, the llsX gene produces another virulence factor, listeriolysin S (LLS), which plays a role in the survival of L. monocytogenes in polymorphonuclear neutrophils, contributes to the virulence observed in a mouse model, and might be important in the pathogenesis of human listeriosis [21]. The proportion of ready-to-eat foods that were found to be contaminated with L. monocytogenes in previous studies was high (> 6%) [22, 23], suggesting that the source materials (e.g., vegetables, meat or seafood) might have been the source of contamination. However, limited published nationwide data that can be used for qualitative and quantitative examination of this bacterium in China are available. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the prevalence and levels of L. monocytogenes isolates in retail raw foods from South China to North China and characterize these L. monocytogenes isolates according to their serogroups, antibiotic susceptibility profiles, and virulence potential by testing for the presence of significant virulence markers.

Materials and Methods

Sampling

From September 2012 until January 2014, 1036 retail raw food samples were collected from supermarkets, fairs and farmers’ markets (n = 134) in 24 cities in 14 provinces and two directly controlled municipalities in China (Fig 1). The samples, including vegetables, edible mushrooms (Flammulina velutipes, Lentinus edodes, Volvariella volvacea, Auricularia auricula, Hypsizygus marmoreus, and Pleurotus eryngii), meat and meat products (bacon/sausage, poultry, pork, mutton and beef), aquatic products (freshwater fish, shrimp and seafood) and quick-frozen products (frozen dumplings/steamed stuffed buns and frozen meat) (S1 Table), were placed in a cold box at a temperature of lower than 4°C, tightly sealed with sterile plastic wrap, and transported to an accredited laboratory and subjected to microbiological analysis within 24 h.
Fig 1

The locations of the sampling sites for this study in China.

Based on 30° northern latitude, there are six cities in north China and 18 cities in South China.

The locations of the sampling sites for this study in China.

Based on 30° northern latitude, there are six cities in north China and 18 cities in South China.

Isolation and detection

The samples were qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed to determine the presence of L. monocytogenes (S1 Fig). For qualitative analysis, L. monocytogenes were isolated according to GB 4789.30–2010 for food microbiological examination of L. monocytogenes (National Food Safety Standards of China) with slight modifications. Briefly, 25 g of the food sample was homogenized in 225 mL of Listeria enrichment broth I culture (LB1, Huankai, Guangzhou, China), followed by incubation at 30°C for 24 h. Subsequently, a 0.1-mL sub-sample of LB1 enrichment broth culture was added to 10 mL of Listeria enrichment broth II culture (LB2, Huankai, Guangzhou, China) and incubated at 30°C for an additional 24 h. The most probable number (MPN) method described by Gombas et al. [24] was adapted for use in this study for quantitative analysis. The same samples were incubated in half Fraser broth (FB1, Huankai, Guangzhou, China) without supplementation at 20°C for 1 h. Subsequently, 10-mL, 1-mL and 0.1-mL aliquots were transferred to tubes containing 0 mL, 10 mL and 10 mL full Fraser broth (FB2, Huankai, Guangzhou, China) at 30°C for 48 h for quantitative analysis. A loopful of enrichment broth culture (10 μL) (LB2, FB1 and FB2 broth cultures) was streaked onto Listeria-selective plates (CHROM-agar, Paris, France) and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. One to four colonies with blue halos were purified on tryptic soy agar with yeast extract (TSA-YE). The purified colonies were analyzed via Gram staining, catalase tests and oxidase tests, and the Micro ID Listeria identification system was used (Microgen, Camberley, UK).

Molecular serogroup identification

All isolates were analyzed by multiplex PCR [13] using five primers (lmo0737, lmo1118, ORF2819, ORF2110 and prs). This method was used to place the L. monocytogenes strains into five serovar groupings: I.1 (1/2a-3a), I.2 (1/2c-3c), II.1 (1/2b-3b-7), II.2 (4b-4d-4e) and III (4a-4c).

Detection of virulence markers

After confirming the L. monocytogenes species, the isolates were also identified using duplex PCR detection of the hly (707 bp) and inlB (367 bp) genes, which are specific to L. monocytogenes, as previously described [25]. Multiplex PCR was also used to identify the virulence genes inlA, inlC and inlJ [26]. The llsX gene was detected through PCR assays to identify LLS-positive L. monocytogenes strains [27]. Presumptive major ECs (ECI, ECII and ECIII) were identified in the isolates as previously described [28]. The primers and PCR conditions are presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Primer sequences, PCR preparations and PCR conditions used for L. monocytogenes isolates in this study.

PCR testTarget geneProduct size (bp)Primer sequences (5’-3’)PCR preparationPCR conditionsReference
dPCR1 inlB, hly 367, 707 inlB-F: GATATTGTGCCACTTTCAGGTT, inlB-R: CCTCTTTCAGTGGTTGGGTT; hly-F: GTTAATGAACCTACAAGACCTTCC, hly-R: ACCGTTCTCCACCATTCCCA 10 μl 2× DreamTaq mastermix, 7 μl nuclease-free water, 80 ng template DNA, and 0.06 μM each primer5 min at 94°C, 35 cycles of 94°C for 35 s, 60°C for 45 s, 72°C for 1 min and a final extension at 72°C for 10 minXu et al. (2009)
mPCR2 inlA, inlC, inlJ 800, 517, 238 inlA-F: ACGAGTAACGGGACAAATGC, inlA-R: CCCGACAGTGGTGCTAGATT; inlC-F: AATTCCCACAGGACACAACC, inlC-R: CGGGAATGCAATTTTTCACTA; inlJ-F: TGTAACCCCGCTTACACACAGTT, inlJ-R: AGCGGCTTGGCAGTCTAATA 12.5 μl 2× DreamTaq mastermix, 6 μl nuclease-free water, 80 ng template DNA, 0.4 μM inlA primer, 0.3 μM inlC primer, and 0.2 μM inlJ primer2 min at 94°C, 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, 72°C for 1 min and a final extension at 72°C for 10 minLiu et al. (2007)
PCR3 llsX 200 llsX-F: TTATTGCATCAATTGTTCTAGGG, llsX-R: CCCCTATAAACATCATGCTAGTG 12.5 μl 2× DreamTaq mastermix, 3.5 μl nuclease-free water, 80 ng template DNA, and 0.4 μM primer3 min at 95°C, 45 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 60°C for 1 min, 72°C for 1 min and a final extension at 72°C for 10 minClayton et al., 2011
mPCR4 ECI, ECII, ECIII 303, 889, 497 ECI-F: AATAGAAATAAGCGGAAGTGT, ECI-R: TTATTTCCTGTCGGCTTAG; ECII-F: ATTATGCCAAGTGGTTACGGA, ECII-R: ATCTGTTTGCGAGACCGTGTC; ECIII-F: TTGCTAATTCTGATGCGTTGG, ECIII-R: GCGCTAGGGAATAGTAAAGG 12.5 μl 2× DreamTaq mastermix, 6 μl nuclease free water, 80 ng template DNA, 0.4 μM ECI primer, 0.7 μM ECII primer, and 0.3 μM ECIII primer3 min at 95°C prior to 15 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min with a touchdown from 55°C to 51°C (3 cycles per temperature), and 1 min at 72°C, followed by 15 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 50°C, and 1 min at 72°C with 1 final cycle for 8 min at 72°CChen & Knabel (2007)

Antibiotic susceptibility tests

Antibiotic susceptibility tests of L. monocytogenes isolates were performed via standard disk diffusion on Mueller—Hinton agar incubated at 37°C for 24 h using the Kirby—Bauer method [29]. The following 14 antibiotics (Oxoid, UK) were classified into 10 different groups according to the WHO [30]: gentamicin (CN, 10 μg), streptomycin (S, 25 μg), kanamycin (K, 30 μg), chloramphenicol (C, 30 μg), rifampicin (RD, 5 μg), cephalothin (KF, 30 μg), vancomycin (VA, 30 μg), clindamycin (DA, 2 μg), erythromycin (E, 15 μg), ampicillin (AMP, 10 μg), mezlocillin (MEZ, 30 μg), penicillin G (P, 5 U), ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 μg) and tetracycline (TE, 30 μg). Staphylococcus aureus ATCC29213 and Escherichia coli ATCC25922 were used as quality control organisms [31].

Statistical analysis

The bacterial numbers were converted to base-10 logarithms for statistical analysis. MPN values < 0.3 MPN/g were set to 0.15, and MPN values > 110 MPN/g were assigned the maximum value for this test [32]. The chi-square test was used to determine differences in the prevalence and levels of L. monocytogenes-positive samples between qualitative variables. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS v21.0 software package.

Results and Discussion

Prevalence and levels of L. monocytogenes in retail raw foods

A total of 1036 raw food samples were collected from supermarkets, fairs and farmers’ markets (n = 134) in 24 Chinese cities. Overall, the average prevalence of L. monocytogenes was 20.0% (207/1036), and the MPN values of 65.7% of the positive samples ranged from 0.3 to 110 MPN/g. The geometric mean was 18.24 MPN/g. Out of the 207 positive samples, 23 (11.1%) had values that exceeded 100 MPN/g, whereas 132 (63.8%) were below 1 MPN/g. Nowadays, there is no standard limit of L. monocytogenes in Chinese retail raw food. Although the US has proposed a zero-tolerance policy for L. monocytogenes in food, the European Union (EU) has proposed a limit of 100 cfu/g; the highest fraction of samples with values that exceeded this limit was observed at the end of the foods’ shelf-life [33]. Thus, on the whole, levels of L. monocytogenes in raw foods in China were not very excessive. The distribution of L. monocytogenes among the different sampling sites is presented in Table 2.
Table 2

Prevalence and level of Listeria monocytogenes at different sampling sites.

Sampling siteSampling time (year.month)No. of samplesNo. (%) of positive samplesNo. of positive samples by quantitative methods (MPN/g) L. monocytogenes level (MPN/g) b
CityProvince< 1≥1–< 10≥10–< 100≥ 100
LanzhouGansu2012.11378 (21.6)421120.14
HaerbinHeilongjiang2012.113714 (37.8)1110216.61
Xi’anShaanxi2012.12379 (24.3)620113.18
TaiyuanShanxi2012.123711 (29.7)423226.75
Beijing a --2013.013713 (35.1)512546.07
JinanShandong2013.013713 (35.1)66104.71
North China -- 222 68 (30.6) 36 14 7 11 21.24
Shanghai a --2012.09379 (24.3)440113.83
HefeiAnhui2012.093710 (27.0)620223.32
NanchangJiangxi2012.09373 (8.1)111016.1
WuhanHubei2012.10373 (8.1)21001.58
ChengduSichuan2012.10375 (13.5)32002.99
KunmingYunnan2012.10376 (16.2)51001.71
GuangzhouGuangdong2013.02~2013.0418544 (23.8)3055413.61
ShenzhenGuangdong2013.05374 (10.8)31000.88
ShaoguanGuangdong2013.05375 (13.5)41000.58
ZhanjiangGuangdong2013.053713 (35.1)921110.92
ShantouGuangdong2013.06378 (21.6)610114.34
HeyuanGuangdong2013.06372 (5.4)11001.95
HaikouHainan2013.12374 (10.8)200255.11
SanyaHainan2014.01373 (8.1)30000.41
BeihaiGuangxi2013.12375 (13.5)310122.76
NanningGuangxi2013.11373 (8.1)30000.22
FuzhouFujian2013.11374 (10.8)40000.3
XiamenFujian2013.11378 (21.6)70102.27
South China -- 814 139 (17.1) 96 23 8 12 10.16

a These two cities are direct-controlled municipalities.

b The values are weighted averages shown as the geometric means of positive samples.

a These two cities are direct-controlled municipalities. b The values are weighted averages shown as the geometric means of positive samples. Among the 24 cities, the prevalence of L. monocytogenes varied in different regions, ranging from 5.4% in Heyuan to 37.8% in Haerbin. Moreover, the developed cities, such as Beijing (35.1%), Shanghai (24.3%) and Guangzhou (23.8%) showed higher prevalence. In total, twelve of the 24 cities (50%) contained L. monocytogenes-positive samples, with MPN values of above 100 MPN/g. The most severe contamination level among the 24 cities was observed in Haikou (55.11 MPN/g), followed by Beijing (46.07 MPN/g), Taiyuan (26.75 MPN/g), Hefei (23.32 MPN/g) and Lanzhou (20.14 MPN/g). A total of 222 samples were collected from North China (Lanzhou, Haerbin, Xi’an, Taiyuan and Beijing). The average prevalence of L. monocytogenes in these samples was 30.6%, with a mean level of 21.24 MPN/g. The prevalence of L. monocytogenes in Lanzhou was 21.6% (8/37), and it was 37.8% (14/37) in Haerbin, 24.3% (9/37) in Xi’an, 29.7% (11/37) in Taiyuan, and 35.1% (13/37) in Beijing. Based on the MPN value, 11 positive samples (11/68, 16.2%) had a L. monocytogenes density that exceeded 100 MPN/g, and 36 positive samples (36/68, 52.9%) had a L. monocytogenes density of below 1 MPN/g. In South China, L. monocytogenes was detected in 139 of the 814 samples (17.1%); of these samples, 12 (8.6%) had an MPN value that exceeded 100 MPN/g, and 96 (69.1%) had a value of less than 1 MPN/g. Based on this result, the prevalence of this bacterium in raw foods from North China was significantly higher than that in foods from South China (p < 0.001, χ2 test); however, the differences in the MPN values were not significant (p > 0.05, χ2 test). This difference in prevalence was especially obvious for L. monocytogenes in fresh meat, which showed 51.4% of prevalence (19/37) in North China whereas 16.2% (22/136) in South China (data not shown). This geographic difference may be partially attributed to the psychrotolerant ability of L. monocytogenes [34]. Due to the high-low latitude climate links (Fig 1), the climate in North China is remarkably colder than that in South China giving L. monocytogenes more opportunity to multiply than other foodborne pathogens. Therefore, local retailers, wholesalers and relevant regulators should pay more attention to L. monocytogenes contamination of retail food. Table 3 lists the analyzed food products classified into five categories, as well as the prevalence and level of L. monocytogenes in these foods.
Table 3

Prevalence and level of Listeria monocytogenes in different retail raw foods.

ProductNo. of samplesNo. (%) of positive samplesNo. of positive samples determined by quantitative methods in the MPN/g range L. monocytogenes level (MPN/g) b
< 1≥1–< 10≥10–< 100≥ 100
Meat and meat products 196 41 (20.9) 25 11 2 3 10.23
Pork8724 (27.6)1381211.69
Beef238 (34.8)62--0.99
Poultry577 (12.3)511-2.87
Mutton62 (33.3)1--155.37
Cured meat/sausage230 (0.0)-----
Aquatic products 280 18 (6.4) 15 0 1 2 13.73
Seafood847 (8.3)6--115.89
Freshwater fish14510 (6.9)8-1113.58
Shrimp511 (2.0)1---0.15
Quick-frozen food a 196 88 (44.9) 66 16 3 3 5.4
Dumplings/steamed stuffed buns8427 (32.1)252--0.46
Frozen meat11261 (54.5)4114337.58
Edible mushrooms 224 52 (23.2) 21 9 9 13 33.67
Flammulina velutipes 8145 (55.6)16891235.45
Other edible mushrooms1437 (4.9)51-120.03
Vegetables 140 8 (5.7) 5 1 0 2 28.15
Total 1036 207 (20.0) 132 37 15 23 18.24

a All quick-frozen foods were stored at -10°C before being sold.

b The values are the weighted averages, shown as geometric means of the positive samples.

a All quick-frozen foods were stored at -10°C before being sold. b The values are the weighted averages, shown as geometric means of the positive samples. Among the analyzed categories, quick-frozen food was the most frequently contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes, with a prevalence that reached 44.9%. The prevalence of L. monocytogenes in dumplings/steamed stuffed bun was 32.1% (27/84), and that in frozen meats was 54.5% (61/112). These values are remarkably higher than those reported in previous studies [35, 36]. In contrast, the mean level of L. monocytogenes in quick-frozen products was the lowest in this survey (5.40 MPN/g). As we know, freezing is an excellent way to preserve food quality and to minimize the incidence of foodborne pathogens; however, L. monocytogenes grows at refrigeration temperatures and can also survive during frozen storage [37]. In fact, Simpson et al. [38] suggested that freezing had little effect on L. monocytogenes in food preserved at -15°C, regardless of the product formulation. Only when a large amount of bacteria was present (3.9 log CFU/cm2) did freezing result in noticeable (≤1 log CFU/cm2) but not significant (p ≥ 0.05) reductions. Therefore, although it is unclear whether these quick-frozen products acquire L. monocytogenes during production or whether these foods are primary reservoirs for this bacterium, there is an urgent need for implementing hygienic standards in food cold-chain management and food processing. The overall prevalence of L. monocytogenes isolates in raw meat (23.7%, 41/173) was higher than that reported in previous studies in China, demonstrating that L. monocytogenes contamination has increased over the years, with a prevalence of 7.1% in 2000 to 2007, 11.67% in 2006 to 2009, 12% in 2008 to 2009, and 23.7% in 2012 to 2014 (this study) [39-44]. Moreover, 7.3% of L. monocytogenes-positive raw meats had MPN values of at least 100 MPN/g. This trend may be related to the rapid development of the meat processing industry in China because post-slaughter processing is a significant cause of meat contamination, and the level of contamination is amplified in the chilling and cutting room environment [45]. Aquatic products, particularly seafood, have high nutritional value, and consumption of these products has increased. Among the 280 aquatic products examined in the survey, L. monocytogenes was the most often encountered in seafood (8.3%, 7/84), followed by freshwater fish (6.9%, 10/145) and shrimp (2.0%, 1/51); the MPN values were less than 100 MPN/g in most of the samples (16/18). In China, these values were higher than those previously reported by Chen et al. [40] (a prevalence of 2.7% from 2000 to 2007) but lower than those obtained by Wang et al. [43], who reported that the prevalence of L. monocytogenes in seafood reached 13.06% from 2008 to 2009. In other countries, the prevalence ranged from 1.4% to 39.0% [46-50]. Because of these differences, the prevalence of L. monocytogenes in aquatic products has been associated with the sample sizes, sample types and geographic locations, which might impact the presence of these organisms [50]. For instance, Gram [51] reviewed studies that reported large variations, with 1% to 34% of the raw fish samples that entered fish processing plants testing positive for L. monocytogenes. Still, seafood frequently triggers regulatory alerts in importing countries. Contamination with L. monocytogenes has led to product recalls, resulting in direct and indirect financial losses [52]. Therefore, L. monocytogenes contamination significantly impacts the seafood trade and should receive increased industry attention. L. monocytogenes was frequently detected in edible mushrooms (23.2%, 52/224), particularly in Flammulina velutipes, for which the fraction of samples that were contaminated was 55.6%. The percentages of Flammulina velutipes and other edible mushrooms that tested positive for L. monocytogenes significantly differed (p < 0.001, χ2 text). Based on this anomaly, we further investigated mushroom production plants to determine the potential source of L. monocytogenes contamination and observed that the contamination originated from mycelium-scraping machinery, which could potentially contaminate both the products and the upstream packaging equipment [53]. Interestingly, in both the mushroom production plant survey and this nationwide retail products survey, the prevalence of L. monocytogenes in Flammulina velutipes was always high. Thus, a correlation between Flammulina velutipes and L. monocytogenes might exist; however, further research is needed to determine the reason for this correlation. Furthermore, although vegetables had a low contamination frequency (5.7%, 8/140), two positive samples (one tomato sample and one lettuce sample) had MPN levels exceeding 100 MPN/g based on quantitative analysis. Because these two types of samples are always consumed raw, more consumers may be exposed to L. monocytogenes, and precautions should be taken to prevent this exposure. Listeriosis is almost always caused by exposure to a food source that was contaminated somewhere along the food chain, and raw materials that enter processing facilities carrying both transient and persistent strains are major sources of contamination [54]. Some strains have been shown to persist for months or even years [12]. Although most of raw food is normally eaten after cooking, the risk of listeriosis should not be underestimated, as the consumption of raw foods such as carpaccio, sushi, and undercooked hamburger is increasing worldwide. On the other hand, it may be necessary to improve hygiene and provide adequate storage conditions, both at the food production level and in retail establishments, to avoid a high level of growth of this pathogen because cross-contamination is a major factor for the introduction of L. monocytogenes to foods. The nationwide data regarding the qualitative and quantitative prevalence and level of L. monocytogenes isolated from retail raw food in China were supplemented based on the results of wide-scale and systematic investigation. These data, in addition to data from studies carried out in other countries, should help to establish local and international standards for levels of L. monocytogenes in foods.

Molecular serogroups of L. monocytogenes isolates

A total of 248 L. monocytogenes isolates were collected from the retail raw foods, comprising 49 isolates from raw meat, 20 isolates from aquatic products, 108 isolates from quick-frozen food, 61 isolates from edible mushrooms and 10 isolates from vegetables. The serogroups carried by the isolates are presented in Table 4.
Table 4

Serogroups of Listeria monocytogenes strains in positive samples.

SourceNo. (%) of serotype-positive isolatesTotal food isolates
1/2a-3a1/2c-3c4b-4d-4e1/2b-3b-74a-4c
Raw meat 23 (46.9)14 (28.6)3 (6.1)7 (14.3)2 (4.1)49
Aquatic products 4 (20)2 (10)3 (15)8 (40)3 (15)20
Quick-frozen food 50 (46.3)22 (20.4)7 (6.5)28 (25.9)1 (0.9)108
Edible mushrooms 32 (52.5)0028 (45.9)1 (1.6)61
Vegetables 3 (30)2 (20)05 (50)010
Total 112 (45.2)40 (16.1)13 (5.2)76 (30.6)7 (2.8)248
Serotypes 3a, 3c, 4d, 4e, 3b, 7 and 4c are rarely (<5%) observed in foods and clinics samples, and in the current study, serotypes 1/2a (112/248, 45.2%), 1/2b (76/248, 30.6%) and 1/2c (40/248, 16.1%) were the major types observed from foods, and 13 isolates (5.2%) and 7 isolates (2.8%) belonged to serotypes 4b and 4a, respectively, which is consistent with the findings of previous studies in other countries [20, 42]. The most prevalent serotype in this study, 1/2a (45.2%), showed good ecological fitness in foods and food-associated environments. Several authors have speculated that this serotype has an increased ability to persist in food and seems to carry more plasmids, which often confer resistance to toxic metals and other compounds [10]. Serotype 4b, which is associated with most major outbreaks of invasive forms of listeriosis [55], was observed only in animal-derived foods (raw meat, aquatic products and quick-frozen products). Although 5.2% of the strains belonged to this serotype, the overrepresentation of serotype 4b strains among human listeriosis outbreaks and the sporadic cases suggest that these strains are more virulent and might pose a greater health threat than the other serotype strains. However, the serogroups most often found associated with edible mushrooms and vegetables were 1/2a-3a and 1/2b-3b-7 (95.8%). The L. monocytogenes serotypes showed different distributions in different food types. This may be due to the fact that some serotypes of L. monocytogenes can outcompete other serotypes during growth environment as well as their niches, distributions and modes of transmission.

Prevalence of virulence markers

All of the isolates harbored hly, and at least one of the internalin genes (inlA, inlB, inlC and inlJ) was present in a majority of the isolates (Table 5).
Table 5

Virulence markers of 248 Listeria monocytogenes strains in positive samples.

Virulence markersNo. (%) of positive samplesNo. (%) of serotype-positive isolates
1/2a-3a1/2c-3c4b-4d-4e1/2b-3b-74a-4c
hly 248/248 (100)112 (100)40 (100)13 (100)76 (100)7 (100)
inlB 245/248 (98.8)111 (99.1)38 (95)13 (100)76 (100)7 (100)
inlA 247/248 (99.6)111(99.1)40 (100)13 (100)76 (100)7 (100)
inlC 243/248 (98.0)111(99.1)40 (100)13 (100)76 (100)3 (42.9)
inlJ 246/248 (99.2)110 (98.240 (100)13 (100)76 (100)7 (100)
llsX 111/248 (44.8)38 (33.9)9 (22.5)10 (76.9)48 (63.2)6 (85.7)
ECI 7/248 (2.8)0 (0)0(0)7 (53.8)0(0)0(0)
ECII 0/248 (0)0(0)0(0)0(0)0(0)0(0)
ECIII 10/248 (4.03)10 (8.9)0(0)0(0)0(0)0(0)
Most of these isolates possessed virulence genes that were similar to those of clinical isolates [56]. Sant’Ana et al. [57] and Shen et al. [20] have also detected these virulence markers in L. monocytogenes from food samples, reporting similar results. In addition, a correlation between inlC and serotype 4a/4c was observed: 4 out of 5 inlC-negative isolates belonged to serotype 4a/4c, whereas the remaining isolate was an inlA-inlC-negative strain. This finding has also been previously observed [58]. den Bakker et al. [59] have demonstrated an association between the presence of inlC genes in pathogenic strains and the absence of these genes in non-pathogenic strains by analyzing the genomes of thirteen Listeria organisms representing six Listeria species. The llsX gene (encoding LLS) was employed as a genetic marker to detect L. monocytogenes with Listeria pathogenicity island 3 (LIPI-3) [21], and isolates from the present study exhibited 44.8% (111/248) positivity. This rate is higher than those obtained by Dmowska et al. [60] and Shen et al. [20], who observed that 7.4% and 12.4% of llsX-positive samples from beef and retail meat, respectively. Although all strains isolated from raw meat and quick-frozen foods contained inlA, inlC and inlJ genes, most of these strains (34/49 and 83/108) lacked the llsX gene. Generally, this ferrous transport gene (siderophore) was present in lineage I isolates (including serotypes 1/2b and 4b) but was absent among lineage II isolates [61]. Half of the lineage I strains, including those involved in outbreaks, carried this gene. L. monocytogenes comprises multiple strains that exhibit varying virulence potential. Although the differences in the virulence potential is not completely due to the presence of these genes, positivity for these virulence makers plays an important role in the pathogenicity of L. monocytogenes. Thus, detection of these markers may represent a quick approach for preliminary discrimination of potentially virulent strains from avirulent strains of L. monocytogenes [26]. The high prevalence of these genes in isolates derived from food products indicates that they may not serve as sufficient indicators for pathogenic L. monocytogenes and that their sequences (e.g., premature stop codon mutations in inlA) may be further investigated to explore differences, which could help in differentiating pathogenic from less pathogenic strains. However, the serotypes of worldwide L. monocytogenes included ECs that have been related to several major outbreaks in the US and Europe [14, 62]. These ECs, detected in 2.8% of the ECI isolates and 4.03% of the ECIII isolates in this study, still showed low percentage in food and food processing as described previously [20]. Nonetheless, EC is defined as isolates with a presumably common ancestor that are genetically related; thus, ECs facilitate strain characterization and the integration of subtype data into inspection programs that are based on assessment of relative risks [15]. L. monocytogenes EC strains possess unique adaptations that explain the frequent involvement of these bacteria in listeriosis outbreaks. Their presence in retail raw foods is a great threat to public health.

Antibiotic susceptibility

L. monocytogenes is naturally sensitive to a wide spectrum of antibiotics; however, recently, a continuous pattern of emergence of resistant strains has been reported [7, 10, 63]. Fourteen antibiotics from 10 different groups were used in the present study to assess resistance of the L. monocytogenes isolates. The results (Table 6) revealed that penicillin G was the only antibiotic to which all 248 L. monocytogenes isolates were susceptible.
Table 6

Results of antimicrobial susceptibility tests of Listeria monocytogenes isolates obtained from retail raw food in China.

Antimicrobial group AntibioticAntimicrobial class a according to the WHONo. (%) of L. monocytogenes (n = 248)
SusceptibleIntermediateResistant
AminoglycosidesGentamicinCI241 (97.2)4 (1.6)3 (1.2)
StreptomycinCI234 (94.4)2 (0.8)12 (4.8)
KanamycinHI236 (95.2)4 (1.6)8 (3.2)
AmphenicolsChloramphenicolHI228 (91.9)13 (5.2)7 (2.8)
AnsamycinsRifampicinCI239 (96.4)6 (2.4)3 (1.2)
CephalosporinsCephalothinHI241 (97.2)1 (0.4)6 (2.4)
GlycopeptidesVancomycinCI242 (97.6)5 (2.0)1 (0.4)
LincosamidesClindamycinI81 (32.7)49 (19.8)116 (46.8)
MacrolidesErythromycinCI238 (96.0)7 (2.8)3 (1.2)
PenicillinsAmpicillinCI231 (93.1)--17 (6.9)
MezlocillinCI245 (98.8)2 (0.8)1 (0.4)
Penicillin GCI248 (100)--0 (0)
QuinolonesCiprofloxacinCI178 (71.8)60 (24.2)10 (4.0)
TetracyclinesTetracyclineHI222 (89.5)1 (0.4)25 (10.1)

a CI, critically important; HI, highly important; I, important

a CI, critically important; HI, highly important; I, important However, many isolates were resistant to clindamycin (116/248, 46.8%), and several isolates were resistant to tetracycline (25/248, 10.1%), ampicillin (17/248, 6.9%), streptomycin (12/248, 4.8%), ciprofloxacin (10/248, 4.0%), kanamycin (8/248, 3.2%), chloramphenicol (7/248, 2.8%), cephalothin (6/248, 2.4%), gentamicin (3/248, 1.2%), rifampicin (3/248, 1.2%) or erythromycin (3/248, 1.2%). Among the 248 isolates, only 59 strains (23.8%) were susceptible to all 14 tested antibiotics, whereas 84 strains (33.9%) showed an intermediate level of resistance or were resistant to 2 or more antibiotics. Moreover, we detected 7 strains that were resistant to more than 10 antibiotics, of which 4 isolates were collected from raw meat, 2 isolates were obtained from quick-frozen foods and one isolate was obtained from edible mushrooms. These findings confirmed that the prevalence of antibiotic resistance in L. monocytogenes may be increasing [23, 42]. The high prevalence of clindamycin-resistant L. monocytogenes isolates observed in the present study is consistent with that demonstrated in previous reports [8]. The effect of clindamycin on Listeria is controversial because contradictory results have been previously reported in a study describing the isolation of clindamycin-susceptible strains from raw meats, meat products and cheeses in Greece [64]. Clindamycin resistance might be associated with excessive use of this drug in veterinary and human medicine [65]. L. monocytogenes isolates were also resistant to tetracycline, ampicillin, streptomycin and ciprofloxacin. Considering that these antibiotics have been increasingly used as supplements in animal feed, as growth promoters and for the treatment of human disease [66], it is not surprising that resistant strains are more commonly observed. Furthermore, L. monocytogenes can transfer by conjugation of enterococcal and streptococcal plasmids, as well as transposons carrying antibiotic-resistance genes. from Enterococcus-Streptococcus to Listeria and between species of Listeria [67]. Additionally, mutations in chromosomal genes can play a role in conferring antibiotic resistance to Listeria species [65]. Therefore, a high percentage (33.9%) of multi-resistant isolates was found implying that new resistance genes may be acquired and transferred. Godreuil et al. [68] have reported that antibiotic resistance likely results from active efflux associated with the overexpression of lde genes that encode a naturally occurring efflux pump. L. monocytogenes is exposed to a wide variety of drugs in nature; thus, causing adaptation of Listeria to environmental challenges through active efflux. However, attention should be focused on the high level of antimicrobial resistance (76.2%) of L. monocytogenes that was observed in the present study. The controlled use of antimicrobials would limit the emergence of drug-resistant bacteria.

Conclusions

A systematic investigation of the prevalence and contamination levels of L. monocytogenes isolated from retail raw foods was performed. Most of the provincial capitals in China were included in this study, showing a full-scale geographic distribution. In various food categories, the potential risks of infection with L. monocytogenes, specifically for edible mushroom Flammulina velutipes (55.6% positivity for L. monocytogenes), should draw public attention. There was little variability among the molecular serogroup isolates in terms of their geographic distribution among China and other countries. Based on the presence of virulence markers, a subset of L. monocytogenes isolates could potentially cause human diseases. Furthermore, the discovery of many antibiotic-resistant isolates, which represent a public health problem, could be helpful for improving the treatment of listeriosis. This study is a full-scale, systematic investigation of the prevalence of L. monocytogenes in retail raw foods in China and the contamination of these foods, and it provides baseline information for Chinese regulatory authorities to allow the formulation of a regulatory framework for controlling L. monocytogenes and to improve the microbiological safety of raw foods.

Procedures for qualitative detection and quantitative analysis of L. monocytogenes in retail raw foods.

(TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Information regarding the samples assessed in this study.

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.
  45 in total

1.  Pathways of Listeria monocytogenes contamination in the meat processing industry.

Authors:  T Nesbakken; G Kapperud; D A Caugant
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.277

2.  Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method.

Authors:  A W Bauer; W M Kirby; J C Sherris; M Turck
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1966-04       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 3.  Listeria monocytogenes virulence and pathogenicity, a food safety perspective.

Authors:  Sophia Kathariou
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.077

4.  Listeria spp. found on fresh market produce.

Authors:  J E Heisick; D E Wagner; M L Nierman; J T Peeler
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Differentiation of the major Listeria monocytogenes serovars by multiplex PCR.

Authors:  Michel Doumith; Carmen Buchrieser; Philippe Glaser; Christine Jacquet; Paul Martin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Discrimination among Listeria monocytogenes isolates using a mixed genome DNA microarray.

Authors:  Monica K Borucki; Melissa J Krug; Wayne T Muraoka; Douglas R Call
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Survey of Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat foods.

Authors:  David E Gombas; Yuhuan Chen; Rocelle S Clavero; Virginia N Scott
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.077

8.  Listeria monocytogenes contamination patterns for the smoked fish processing environment and for raw fish.

Authors:  Adam D Hoffman; Kenneth L Gall; Dawn M Norton; Martin Wiedmann
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.077

9.  An epidemic of food-borne listeriosis in western Switzerland: description of 57 cases involving adults.

Authors:  C J Büla; J Bille; M P Glauser
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis applied for comparing Listeria monocytogenes strains involved in outbreaks.

Authors:  C Buchrieser; R Brosch; B Catimel; J Rocourt
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.419

View more
  29 in total

1.  Contamination sources, serogroups, biofilm-forming ability and biocide resistance of Listeria monocytogenes persistent in tilapia-processing facilities.

Authors:  Daniel Vázquez-Sánchez; Juliana Antunes Galvão; Marília Oetterer
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 2.701

2.  Antimicrobial Synergy between Aminoglycosides and Licorice Extract in Listeria monocytogenes.

Authors:  Myungseo Park; Liz Horn; Victoria Lappi; Dave Boxrud; Craig Hedberg; Byeonghwa Jeon
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-04-06

Review 3.  Importance of Listeria monocytogenes in food safety: a review of its prevalence, detection, and antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  E Shamloo; H Hosseini; Z Abdi Moghadam; M Halberg Larsen; A Haslberger; M Alebouyeh
Journal:  Iran J Vet Res       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.376

4.  High Prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes in Smoked Duck: Antibiotic and Heat Resistance, Virulence, and Genetics of the Isolates.

Authors:  Eunyoung Park; Jimyeong Ha; Hyemin Oh; Sejeong Kim; Yukyung Choi; Yewon Lee; Yujin Kim; Yeongeun Seo; Joohyun Kang; Yohan Yoon
Journal:  Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2021-03-01

5.  Analysis of Multilocus Sequence Typing and Virulence Characterization of Listeria monocytogenes Isolates from Chinese Retail Ready-to-Eat Food.

Authors:  Shi Wu; Qingping Wu; Jumei Zhang; Moutong Chen; Weipeng Guo
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 6.  Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility profiles of Listeria monocytogenes contamination of chicken flocks and meat in Oyo State, south-western Nigeria: Public health implications.

Authors:  O O Ishola; J I Mosugu; H K Adesokan
Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg       Date:  2016-09

7.  Isolation and characterization of Listeria species from rodents in natural environments in China.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Liang Lu; Ruiting Lan; Joelle K Salazar; Jingli Liu; Jianguo Xu; Changyun Ye
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 7.163

8.  Prevalence, Virulence Genes, Antimicrobial Susceptibility, and Genetic Diversity of Staphylococcus aureus from Retail Aquatic Products in China.

Authors:  Dongli Rong; Qingping Wu; Mingfang Xu; Jumei Zhang; Shubo Yu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Listeria monocytogenes in Fresh Produce: Outbreaks, Prevalence and Contamination Levels.

Authors:  Qi Zhu; Ravi Gooneratne; Malik Altaf Hussain
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2017-03-09

10.  Risk Factors and Level of Listeria monocytogenes Contamination of Raw Pork in Retail Markets in China.

Authors:  Hua Li; Pengfei Wang; Ruiting Lan; Lijuan Luo; Xiaolong Cao; Yi Wang; Yan Wang; Hui Li; Lu Zhang; Shunshi Ji; Changyun Ye
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.