| Literature DB >> 26317017 |
Aida A Mahmoud1, Amal K A Nor El-Din2.
Abstract
Objectives. The aim of the present investigation was to study the activity of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) and correlate its activity to protein oxidation markers in type 2 diabetic patients under poor glycemic control. Methods. G6PD activity, protein carbonyl group concentration, and total thiol group content were measured in blood samples of 40 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus under poor glycemic control and 20 healthy control subjects. Results. G6PD activity and total thiol group content decreased significantly while glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) and protein carbonyl group concentration increased significantly in diabetic patients than in the controls (P < 0.001). In addition, Obtained results revealed that, in diabetics, G6PD activity negatively correlated to protein carbonyl and HbA1C (r = -0.77 and -0.65, resp.), while positively correlated to total thiol (r = 0.66) and protein carbonyl negatively correlated to total thiol (r = -0.85), while positively correlated to HbA1C (r = 0.43). Also in controls, G6PD activity negatively correlated to protein carbonyl and HbA1C (r = -0.57 and -0.56, resp.), while positively correlated to total thiol (r = 0.5) and protein carbonyl negatively correlated to total thiol (r = -0.48), while positively correlated to HbA1C (r = 0.68). Conclusions. We concluded that G6PD activity decreased in diabetics than in controls and was negatively correlated to oxidative stress markers and HbA1C. G6PD activity can be taken as a biomarker of oxidative stress and poor glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 26317017 PMCID: PMC4437381 DOI: 10.1155/2013/430813
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomark ISSN: 2090-7699
The clinical and laboratory characteristics of the participants.
| Parameter | Control ( | Diabetics ( |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 58 ± 7.1 | 57 ± 7 |
| ♂/♀ ratio | 8 : 12 | 15 : 25 |
| Medications | — | Oral hypoglycemic drugs |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.9 ± 2.1 (8.4) | 23 ± 1.7 (7.2) |
| FBG (mg/dL) | 101 ± 10.8 (10.7) | 274 ± 50*** (18.4) |
| TC (mg/dL) | 185 ± 13 (7.1) | 238.5 ± 62.4** (26.1) |
| HDL (mg/dL) | 39 ± 3.8 (10.1) | 30.5 ± 7.2** (23.6) |
| LDL (mg/dL) | 183 ± 13.7 (7.5) | 229 ± 40* (17.4) |
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 166 ± 32 (19.5) | 176.5 ± 57 (32.5) |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.8 ± 0.5 (8.68) | 9.9 ± 0.96*** (9.7) |
| G6PD activity (U/gHb) | 8.1 ± 0.7 (8.9) | 6.7 ± 0.76*** (11.4) |
| Protein carbonyl (nmol/mg protein) | 3.2 ± 0.54 (16.7) | 14.5 ± 2.14*** (14.8) |
| Total thiol ( | 325 ± 33 (10.3) | 201 ± 18*** (9.1) |
Data were represented as mean ± SD (CV %). FBG: fasting blood glucose; TC: total cholesterol; HDL: high density lipoprotein; LDL: low density lipoprotein; *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05.
Pearsons correlation between the parameters.
| Control | Diabetics | |
|---|---|---|
| G6PD activity & HbA1c | −0.57∗∗ | −0.65∗∗∗ |
| G6PD activity & total thiol | 0.5∗ | 0.66∗∗∗ |
| G6PD activity & protein carbonyl | −0.56∗ | −0.77∗∗∗ |
| Protein carbonyl & total thiol | −0.48∗∗ | −0.85∗∗∗ |
| Protein carbonyl & HbA1c | 0.68∗∗∗ | 0.43∗∗ |
| Total thiol & HbA1c | −0.66∗∗ | −0.29∗ |
*** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05.
Figure 1Correlation between HbA1C and G6PD activity in controls (a) and diabetics (b).
Figure 2Correlation between thiol group and G6PD activity in controls (a) and diabetics (b).
Figure 3Correlation between carbonyl group and G6PD in controls (a) and diabetics (b).
Figure 4Correlation between carbonyl group and thiol group in controls (a) and diabetics (b).
Figure 5Correlation between HbA1C and carbonyl group in controls (a) and diabetics (b).
Figure 6Correlation between HbA1C and thiol group in controls (a) and diabetics (b).