Literature DB >> 26315704

Cost effectiveness of collagen crosslinking for progressive keratoconus in the UK NHS.

H A Salmon1, D Chalk1, K Stein1, N A Frost2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Keratoconus is a progressive degenerative corneal disorder of children and young adults that is traditionally managed by refractive error correction, with corneal transplantation reserved for the most severe cases. UVA collagen crosslinking is a novel procedure that aims to prevent disease progression, currently being considered for use in the UK NHS. We assess whether it might be a cost-effective alternative to standard management for patients with progressive keratoconus.
METHODS: We constructed a Markov model in which we estimated disease progression from prospective follow-up studies, derived costs derived from the NHS National Tariff, and calculated utilities from linear regression models of visual acuity in the better-seeing eye. We performed deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of possible variations in the model parameters.
RESULTS: Collagen crosslinking is cost effective compared with standard management at an incremental cost of £ 3174 per QALY in the base case. Deterministic sensitivity analysis shows that this could rise above £ 33,263 per QALY if the duration of treatment efficacy is limited to 5 years. Other model parameters are not decision significant. Collagen crosslinking is cost effective in 85% of simulations at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £ 30,000 per QALY.
CONCLUSION: UVA collagen crosslinking is very likely to be cost effective, compared with standard management, for the treatment of progressive keratoconus. However, further research to explore its efficacy beyond 5 years is desirable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26315704      PMCID: PMC4645452          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2015.151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  31 in total

1.  Quality of life with visual acuity loss from diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Melissa M Brown; Gary C Brown; Sanjay Sharma; Jennifer Landy; Jeff Bakal
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-04

2.  Trends in the indications for corneal graft surgery in the United Kingdom: 1999 through 2009.

Authors:  Tiarnan D L Keenan; Mark N A Jones; Sally Rushton; Fiona M Carley
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-05

3.  Two-year corneal cross-linking results in patients younger than 18 years with documented progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  Paolo Vinciguerra; Elena Albé; Beatrice E Frueh; Silvia Trazza; Daniel Epstein
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  The Dundee University Scottish Keratoconus study: demographics, corneal signs, associated diseases, and eye rubbing.

Authors:  K H Weed; C J MacEwen; T Giles; J Low; C N J McGhee
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study: methods and findings to date.

Authors:  H Wagner; J T Barr; K Zadnik
Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 3.077

6.  Measure of keratoconus progression using Orbscan II.

Authors:  Hyojin Kim; Choun-Ki Joo
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light in keratoconus: long-term results.

Authors:  Frederik Raiskup-Wolf; Anne Hoyer; Eberhard Spoerl; Lutz E Pillunat
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  A randomised, prospective study to investigate the efficacy of riboflavin/ultraviolet A (370 nm) corneal collagen cross-linkage to halt the progression of keratoconus.

Authors:  David P S O'Brart; Elsie Chan; Konstantinos Samaras; Parul Patel; Shaheen P Shah
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  [Evaluation of the rapidity of progression of keratoconus by a study of the relationship between age when first detected and age at operation (author's transl)].

Authors:  Y Pouliquen; M R Forman; J P Giraud
Journal:  J Fr Ophtalmol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 0.818

10.  Probabilistic Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of bronchodilator therapy in COPD patients in different countries.

Authors:  Jan B Oostenbrink; Maureen P M H Rutten-van Mölken; Brigitta U Monz; J Mark FitzGerald
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.725

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comment on 'Cost effectiveness of collagen crosslinking for progressive keratoconus in the UK NHS'.

Authors:  D A Godefrooij; G A de Wit; M J Mangen; R P L Wisse
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  Corneal Cross-Linking for Pediatric Keratcoconus Review.

Authors:  Claudia Perez-Straziota; Ronald N Gaster; Yaron S Rabinowitz
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 3.  Machine Learning Algorithms to Detect Subclinical Keratoconus: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Howard Maile; Ji-Peng Olivia Li; Daniel Gore; Marcello Leucci; Padraig Mulholland; Scott Hau; Anita Szabo; Ismail Moghul; Konstantinos Balaskas; Kaoru Fujinami; Pirro Hysi; Alice Davidson; Petra Liskova; Alison Hardcastle; Stephen Tuft; Nikolas Pontikos
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2021-12-13

Review 4.  Pediatric Crosslinking: Current Protocols and Approach.

Authors:  Júlia Polido; Maria Emília Dos Xavier Santos Araújo; João G Alexander; Thiago Cabral; Renato Ambrósio; Denise Freitas
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2022-04-28

5.  The Safety Profile of FDA-Approved Epithelium-Off Corneal Cross-Linking in a US Community-Based Healthcare System.

Authors:  Michael J Ang; Jeanne A Darbinian; Eliza N Hoskins; Douglas S Holsclaw; Sudha Sudesh; Naveen S Chandra
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.