Literature DB >> 26315519

Breast Cancer Screening.

David Euhus1, Philip A Di Carlo2, Nagi F Khouri2.   

Abstract

Breast cancer screening has become a controversial topic. Understanding the points of contention requires an appreciation of the conceptual framework underpinning cancer screening in general, knowledge of the strengths and limitations of available screening modalities, and familiarity with published clinical trial data. This review is data intense with the intention of presenting enough information to permit the reader to enter into the discussion with an ample knowledge base. The focus throughout is striking a balance between the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast MRI; Breast cancer; Mammographic density; Mammography; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26315519     DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2015.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Clin North Am        ISSN: 0039-6109            Impact factor:   2.741


  8 in total

Review 1.  The changing landscape of phase I trials in oncology.

Authors:  Kit Man Wong; Anna Capasso; S Gail Eckhardt
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Controversies on Mammography Screening in the World and Bahceşehir Population-Based Organized Mammography Screening Project in Turkey.

Authors:  Vahit Özmen
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2015-10-01

3.  Evaluation of Breast Cancer Knowledge and Awareness Among Hospital Staff in a Women Heath Hospital in Turkey.

Authors:  Gökay Terzioğlu; Emre Özgü; Murat Özgür Kılıç; Yunus Yıldız; Tayfun Güngör
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Molecular expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, prokineticin receptor-1 and other biomarkers in infiltrating canalicular carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  Angélica Morales; Sumiko Morimoto; Felipe Vilchis; Natsuko Taniyama; Claudia J Bautista; Carlos Robles; Enrique Bargalló
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Simplifying Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System classification of mammograms with pure suspicious calcifications.

Authors:  Gisela Lg Menezes; Gonneke Ao Winter-Warnars; Eva L Koekenbier; Emma J Groen; Helena M Verkooijen; Ruud M Pijnappel
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.136

6.  Optoacoustic imaging of the breast: correlation with histopathology and histopathologic biomarkers.

Authors:  Gisela L G Menezes; Ritse M Mann; Carla Meeuwis; Bob Bisschops; Jeroen Veltman; Philip T Lavin; Marc J van de Vijver; Ruud M Pijnappel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Imaging Modalities for Breast Cancer Surveillance Among BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jiaxin Li; Ziqi Jia; Menglu Zhang; Gang Liu; Zeyu Xing; Xin Wang; Xin Huang; Kexin Feng; Jiang Wu; Wenyan Wang; Jie Wang; Jiaqi Liu; Xiang Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Serum irisin levels are lower in patients with breast cancer: association with disease diagnosis and tumor characteristics.

Authors:  Xeni Provatopoulou; Georgia P Georgiou; Eleni Kalogera; Vasileios Kalles; Maira A Matiatou; Ioannis Papapanagiotou; Alexandros Sagkriotis; George C Zografos; Antonia Gounaris
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.