M-P Schallmo1, S R Sponheim2, C A Olman3. 1. Graduate Program in Neuroscience,University of Minnesota,Minneapolis, MN,USA. 2. Veterans Affairs Medical Center,Minneapolis, MN,USA. 3. Department of Psychology,University of Minnesota,Minneapolis, MN,USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The salience of a visual stimulus is often reduced by nearby stimuli, an effect known as surround suppression of perceived contrast, which may help in locating the borders of an object. Weaker surround suppression has been observed in schizophrenia but it is unclear whether this abnormality is present in other mental disorders with similar symptomatology, or is evident in people with genetic liability for schizophrenia. METHOD: By examining surround suppression among subjects with schizophrenia or bipolar affective disorder, their unaffected biological relatives and healthy controls we sought to determine whether diminished surround suppression was specific to schizophrenia, and if subjects with a genetic risk for either disorder would show similar deficits. Measuring perceived contrast in different surround conditions also allowed us to investigate how this suppression depends on the similarity of target and surrounding stimuli. RESULTS: Surround suppression was weaker among schizophrenia patients regardless of surround configuration. Subjects with bipolar affective disorder showed an intermediate deficit, with stronger suppression than in schizophrenia but weaker than control subjects. Surround suppression was normal in relatives of both patient groups. Findings support a deficit in broadly tuned (rather than sharply orientation- or direction-selective) suppression mechanisms. CONCLUSIONS: Weak broadly tuned suppression during visual perception is evident in schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder, consistent with impaired gain control related to the clinical expression of these conditions.
BACKGROUND: The salience of a visual stimulus is often reduced by nearby stimuli, an effect known as surround suppression of perceived contrast, which may help in locating the borders of an object. Weaker surround suppression has been observed in schizophrenia but it is unclear whether this abnormality is present in other mental disorders with similar symptomatology, or is evident in people with genetic liability for schizophrenia. METHOD: By examining surround suppression among subjects with schizophrenia or bipolar affective disorder, their unaffected biological relatives and healthy controls we sought to determine whether diminished surround suppression was specific to schizophrenia, and if subjects with a genetic risk for either disorder would show similar deficits. Measuring perceived contrast in different surround conditions also allowed us to investigate how this suppression depends on the similarity of target and surrounding stimuli. RESULTS: Surround suppression was weaker among schizophreniapatients regardless of surround configuration. Subjects with bipolar affective disorder showed an intermediate deficit, with stronger suppression than in schizophrenia but weaker than control subjects. Surround suppression was normal in relatives of both patient groups. Findings support a deficit in broadly tuned (rather than sharply orientation- or direction-selective) suppression mechanisms. CONCLUSIONS: Weak broadly tuned suppression during visual perception is evident in schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder, consistent with impaired gain control related to the clinical expression of these conditions.
Authors: Deanna M Barch; Cameron S Carter; Steve C Dakin; James Gold; Steven J Luck; Angus Macdonald; John D Ragland; Steven Silverstein; Milton E Strauss Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2011-11-17 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Jong H Yoon; Richard J Maddock; Ariel Rokem; Michael A Silver; Michael J Minzenberg; J Daniel Ragland; Cameron S Carter Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2010-03-10 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Carol Jahshan; Jonathan K Wynn; Amanda McCleery; David C Glahn; Lori L Altshuler; Michael F Green Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2014-01-02 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Takanori Hashimoto; H Holly Bazmi; Karoly Mirnics; Qiang Wu; Allan R Sampson; David A Lewis Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2008-02-15 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Brian P Keane; Steven M Silverstein; Yushi Wang; Matthew W Roché; Thomas V Papathomas Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2016-06-22 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Eric A Reavis; Junghee Lee; Jonathan K Wynn; Stephen A Engel; Amy M Jimenez; Michael F Green Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Victor J Pokorny; Timothy J Lano; Michael-Paul Schallmo; Cheryl A Olman; Scott R Sponheim Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2019-12-20 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Katharine N Thakkar; Livon Ghermezi; Steven M Silverstein; Rachael Slate; Beier Yao; Eric D Achtyes; Jan W Brascamp Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2020-12-10
Authors: Elaine J Anderson; Marc S Tibber; D Sam Schwarzkopf; Sukhwinder S Shergill; Emilio Fernandez-Egea; Geraint Rees; Steven C Dakin Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2016-12-26 Impact factor: 6.167