| Literature DB >> 26313726 |
Rafael Cantero Dorsa1, José Carlos Dorsa Vieira Pontes2, Andréia Conceição Brochado Antoniolli1, Guilherme Viotto Rodrigues da Silva1, Ricardo Adala Benfatti1, Carlos Henrique Marques dos Santos1, Elenir Rose Cury Pontes1, José Anderson Souza Goldiano1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of postconditioning remote in ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat lungs.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26313726 PMCID: PMC4541782 DOI: 10.5935/1678-9741.20150005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc
Fig. 1Rat positioned on the operating table with four limbs abducted and antisepsis with iodine performed.
Fig. 2Clamp in the abdominal aorta.
Fig. 3Dried lungs.
Classification described by Greca et al.[.
| Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 3 | Grade 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | Mild | Moderate | Severe |
| Normal parenchyma on optical microscopy | Focal edema in few alveolar septa, mild congestion, neutrophils in alveolar septa less than 50 per highpower field | Moderate edema in the alveolar septa or mild edema in several septa, moderate congestion, neutrophils in alveolar septa between 50 and 100 per high-power field | Severe edema in the alveolar septa or mild edema in several septa, moderate congestion, neutrophils in alveolar septa more than 100 per high-power field |
Fig. 4Photograph of histological changes of the lung parenchyma at regular, mild, moderate and intense degrees according Greca et al.[ classification. (40X optical microscopy - hematoxylin-eosin staining).
Number of rats according to the focal edema scores at histological examination in groups: A (ischemia and reperfusion), B (remote post conditioning) and C (control).
| Focal edema | A | B | C |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (normal) | 0 | 6 | 8 |
| 2 (slight) | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| 3 (mild) | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 (severe) | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total of animals | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Average scores ± standard deviation | A3.6±0.5 | B1.3±0.5 | B1.0±0.0 |
| Median of scores | 4 | 1 | 1 |
Note: Kruskal Wallis test followed by Student-Newman - Keuls test. Equal letters indicate statistically significant difference. Different letters indicate statistically significant difference.
A x B x C: P-value=<0.001
A x B: P-value=0.002
A x C: P-value=<0.001
B x C: P-value=0.572
Fig. 5Mean and standard deviation scores of the focal edema at histological examination in groups: A (ischemia and reperfusion), B (remote postconditioning) and C (control).
Note: Kruskal Wallis followed by Student-Newman – Keuls test. Equal lowercase letters indicate statistically significant difference. Different lowercase letters indicate statistically significant difference. P-value=<0.001; A x B: P-value=0.002; A x C: P-value=<0.001; B x C: P-value=0.572.
| AMP | Adenosine monophosphate |
| ATP | Adenosine triphosphate |
| COBEA | Brazilian College of Animal Experimentation |
| IPoC | Ischemic postconditioning |
| IPreC | Ischemic preconditioning |
| R-PosC | Remote postconditioning |
| TROS | Toxic reactive oxygen species |
| RCD | Writing; bibliographic survey |
| JCDVP | Review |
| ACBA | Guidance |
| GVRS | Bibliographic survey |
| RAB | Review |
| CHMS | Guidance |
| ERCP | Statistical analysis |
| JASG | Experimental Surgery |